Jump to content

PM to appoint Tory insiders to Senate


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have no problem if Harper appoints Tories. I have a problem saying that he was going to do something different or that he was unilaterally going to chance the Senate.

I don't think madmax or fellowtraveller are going to get it. They'd rather randomly gripe as a distraction from Harper's hypocricy.

[sp.]

Edited by g_bambino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Constitution was created during a depression by Trudeau. The Constitution was tinkered with by Mulroney twice, once in an upturn and once in a downturn.

Opening up the Constitution is just an ugly act. An act people would prefer to avoid, then the LOUDEST people to scream when the CPC appoints are LIBERALS and the LOUDEST people to scream when the LPC appoints are CONSERVATIVES.

You started this thread, because you wanted it to be an issue. Now you wish it to go away because you have a new set of talking points for the upcoming Election showdown.

The Economy is in a recession all on its own.

However, if we are going to open the constitution, when the shit hits the fan, Abolition will find its way to the top of the chart amongst the publice once the squabbling begins.

Traditional Liberals enjoy their patronage appointments and having the cow pasture handy for their friends. They do not like it when the Conservatives sneak in and milk it.

OF course the Liberals don't like it, but in the end, as bad as some Liberals appointments have been, at least they didn't appoint someone who is illiterate.

Anywho, as I mentioned in a previous thread, honestly, people who get tied up in "having an elected senate" are really just donkey's shilling partisan drivel without any real knowledge of our government institutions and how they work.

In the end, put term limits and make it a rule that they've got to show up while the HoC is sitting but in the end making it elected, besides the constitutional trouble opens up a can of beans. Making it an effective check on the HoC leads to getting even less done. I'd rather see it abolished rather than an elected body. Just because people are elected doesn't make it the best institution. Look at the malarky going on down south. No wonder they get nothing done, nothing can get through. In the end, we vote for the people that actually write the legislation and no one is taking that right away. Why make it worse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...