Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
M.Dancer, if you could (for a change) actually explain your arguments, describe how a statement of mine is "x or y or z".

No one needs explain to the clown why he is funny....

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)
No one needs explain to the clown why he is funny....

Indeed, and you're doing pantomime and making a fool of yourself by not addressing supposedly absurd statements.

So laugh away clown, laugh...

Edited by lictor616

-Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-

Posted
Indeed, and you're doing pantomime and making a fool of yourself by not addressing supposedly absurd statements.

So laugh away clown, laugh...

Don't play dumb.

The reason why a clown doesn't need any explaining as to why he is funny is because the clown knows why he is funny. You know exactlt why you are ridiculous....

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Don't play dumb.

The reason why a clown doesn't need any explaining as to why he is funny is because the clown knows why he is funny. You know exactlt why you are ridiculous....

Would you entertain a response if told you I did'nt?

I suspect not.

-Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-

Posted (edited)
Don't play dumb.

The reason why a clown doesn't need any explaining as to why he is funny is because the clown knows why he is funny. You know exactlt why you are ridiculous....

I suppose you're simply too authoritarian in spirit and too willing to follow the party line of Political Correctness to see any dissenters from it as anything other then "ridiculous". To you, a Politically Incorrect or (heaven forbid!) "intolerant" response is ridiculous because it is Blasphemy, they are statements of religious impiety to the religion of Political Correctness and hence "ridiculous".

Such as claiming that not to believe in virgin birth or other miraculous nonsense in the new testament would evoke shudders and squawks in medieval times.

To you an unorthodox response is ridiculous BECAUSE it is unorthodox and hence needn't be addressed.

Edited by lictor616

-Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-

Posted
Should we deport immigrants who support terrorism? No, instead we should pay attention to any human who cannot imagine himself/herself becoming a potential terrorist.

!?!?

-Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-

Posted

Well, I missed this gem!

And exactly how did the "natives" have any real "legal" claim to the territories of north america?

Constitution s. 35

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/annex_e.html#II

You (like so many other self hating "Euro-canadians")

<_<

Rights cannot exist without force. you can't depend on anything but force in statecraft. Diplomacy works only if it's backed up by force. Diplomacy itself is about force: the threat of it, the use of it, the direction of it.

Whether people are fair or "nice" or equitable is irrelevant. Our choice is to be feared or to be the victim. There is no other choice.

There is the law. That's our choice generally, being Canadians.

(What alternative reality are you in?)

:lol:

My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.

Posted
Well, I missed this gem!

Constitution s. 35

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/annex_e.html#II

<_<

There is the law. That's our choice generally, being Canadians.

(What alternative reality are you in?)

:lol:

ah yes the Schedule to the Constitution Act, ----------- 1982... when the fighting was pretty much done... and the land very much settled..

you completely miss the point that there WAS NO SUCH LEGALITY or "RIGHTS" during the incipient moments of the creation of this Nation.

-Magna Europa Est Patria Nostra-

Posted
ah yes the Schedule to the Constitution Act, ----------- 1982... when the fighting was pretty much done... and the land very much settled..

you completely miss the point that there WAS NO SUCH LEGALITY or "RIGHTS" during the incipient moments of the creation of this Nation.

Sissy.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...