Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Societies will come out victorious on crimes only when they will put more pressures on those that are more likely to ever cross the paths of (would-be) criminals than on those that are not. Rifles owners have more chances to cross on their paths (in isolated fields, in practice clubs, etc.) handguns smugglers and potential killers than a non-gun owners.

Yeah, right! How many murders and crimes have been committed at a gun club?

Tell it to Jane Creba!

"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Yeah, right! How many murders and crimes have been committed at a gun club?

Tell it to Jane Creba!

Jane Creba's life is no more important than the next victim. What you want to be scraped may save the life to this person.

Posted

This seems to be quite a controversial topic (21 pages!). I think there are regional differences at play; owning a gun in urban Toronto is very different from owning a gun in rural Saskatchewan.

Posted
This seems to be quite a controversial topic (21 pages!). I think there are regional differences at play; owning a gun in urban Toronto is very different from owning a gun in rural Saskatchewan.

Absolutely true.

But why is it a problem for law-abiding owners to register their guns anywhere?

My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.

Posted
Why is it a problem to flush billions of taxpayers dollars down the toilet?

For some reason, Harper has no problem flushing billions of taxpayer dollars down the toilet to arrest and prosecute people for selling or possessing marijuana even though a majority of Canadians want it legalized.

Posted
For some reason, Harper has no problem flushing billions of taxpayer dollars down the toilet to arrest and prosecute people for selling or possessing marijuana even though a majority of Canadians want it legalized.
Complete legalization is not an option because of international agreements. Partial legalization would only exacerbate the crime problems created by the demand. Prosecuting people for possession reduces the demand.

To fly a plane, you need both a left wing and a right wing.

Posted
Complete legalization is not an option because of international agreements. Partial legalization would only exacerbate the crime problems created by the demand. Prosecuting people for possession reduces the demand.

Legalization would legalize it, so it would reduce crime ... because it wouldn't be a crime.

Regulation is what is needed.

And taxes. ;)

My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.

Posted
What does it accomplish?

The gun registry was the Liberals attempt at confiscation.........people think it is a simple registry...think again

it is more Liberal corruption at its finest!! First register them then they will eventually come and take them!

http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read...4&issue=006

http://www.spruce.ca/gunctrl.htm

Posted
The gun registry was the Liberals attempt at confiscation.

I've never believed that. It's simply a misguided idea that is supposed to help...but really doesn't do all that much.

Posted
Basically, it allows us to keep statistics. That's it.

Pretty much. More than anything, it was a way to make some people feel better.

Posted
Yeah, right! How many murders and crimes have been committed at a gun club?

If no murder has happened at a gun clubs, it is certainly in part because club members share a lot together. Sharing information about what people have in mind is how we prevent crimes. I imagine easily, for instance, a discussion forum full of frustrated gun owners arousing soon-to-be killers to reveal their projects.

Posted
If no murder has happened at a gun clubs, it is certainly in part because club members share a lot together. Sharing information about what people have in mind is how we prevent crimes. I imagine easily, for instance, a discussion forum full of frustrated gun owners arousing soon-to-be killers to reveal their projects.

Please be sure to board the 'B' Ark!

"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

Posted
If no murder has happened at a gun clubs, it is certainly in part because club members share a lot together.

You have to be King of the Trolls. No one can consistently write such stupid posts. Obama would likely bow to you.

Posted

Get real now! Why rural land owners feel so innocent worldwide? Because they like to forget that, for centuries, they have forced the population to migrate in city ghettos.

Posted
I've never believed that. It's simply a misguided idea that is supposed to help...but really doesn't do all that much.

Indeed, it was supposed to help - the Liberals get re-elected. It had no other purpose. It still has no other purpose.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
Apparently a lot of people who claim they won't kill anybody with their weapons nonetheless are unwilling to register theirs either. Why is that?

Cause it's a waste of time and costs them money? Maybe?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
Pro-gun posters here show they don't mind wasting their time, how could they credibly criticize the register for wasting their money?

You have misapprehended the sides here. It's is not pro-gun vs anti-gun. I, for example, do not own a gun, and probably will never own a gun.

The argument is between pro-gun + smart people... against the anti-gun people + stupid people.

Glad to be of assistance.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
You have misapprehended the sides here. It's is not pro-gun vs anti-gun. I, for example, do not own a gun, and probably will never own a gun.

The argument is between pro-gun + smart people... against the anti-gun people + stupid people.

Glad to be of assistance

One doesn't need to own a gun to be pro-gun.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,899
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Shemul Ray
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...