scribblet Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 This reminds me of Dancer's 'talking toasters' when referring to one of Topaz's comments.----------------- In all probability these websites were set up by the --"Progressives of the Liberal-NDP parties" and of course those with the only intent on posting this type of trash on this board is to maliciously smear the object of their dislike or hatred. ` Exactly, sometimes I think this board has amalgamated with Rabble or something - Yikes Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
Mr.Canada Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 The people are sheep, easily panicked, easily herded. To listen to the media you'd think we were in the middle of another great depression. Instead, employment remains high, and the Bank of Canada expects the economy to resurge in a year or so. I'd rather see pet projects gutted and foreign aid cut off completely so we can look after Canada first as we are more important than any other nation, every nation should feel this way imo. We need to take a Canada first approach but what are we to do. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
ToadBrother Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 I'd rather see pet projects gutted and foreign aid cut off completely so we can look after Canada first as we are more important than any other nation, every nation should feel this way imo. We need to take a Canada first approach but what are we to do. Because, after all, that's what Jesus would do... Quote
Mr.Canada Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 Because, after all, that's what Jesus would do... If you say so. We must put Canadians first right now, not last like we usually do. Quote "You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley Canadian Immigration Reform Blog
guyser Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 In all probability these websites were set up by the --"Progressives of the Liberal-NDP parties" and of course those with the only intent on posting this type of trash on this board is to maliciously smear the object of their dislike or hatred.` So , perhaps the left learned well from the right? Quote
Martin Chriton Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 The people are sheep, easily panicked, easily herded. To listen to the media you'd think we were in the middle of another great depression. Instead, employment remains high, and the Bank of Canada expects the economy to resurge in a year or so. Exactly. This is why, it would've been in all our benefits for the Conservatives to have won a majority the last election. They're now forced to spend to get support from the spend-our-way-out-of-deficit socialist parties. Their original economic statement was much more apt. You get the government you deserve. Hopefully next election people will think twice before voting for the Liberals. Quote
Smallc Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 If you say so. We must put Canadians first right now, not last like we usually do. Yes, we Canadians live such under privileged lives. Quote
guyser Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 Exactly. This is why, it would've been in all our benefits for the Conservatives to have won a majority the last election. They're now forced to spend to get support from the spend-our-way-out-of-deficit socialist parties. Their original economic statement was much more apt. So they are to become what they despise ? Why would that be? If their economic plan is so swell, then the obviousness of it means they get good results, and good results gets one a majority. Not to mention you feel that Harper doesnt have the cajones to pull it off. You get the government you deserve. Hopefully next election people will think twice before voting for the Liberals. Id settle for people to think twice before voting. But thats just me. Quote
Martin Chriton Posted January 26, 2009 Report Posted January 26, 2009 So they are to become what they despise ? Why would that be? It's not binary, they'll spend a lot less than the Library / NDP / Bloc trio would have. Their decision is a pragmatic one, not an idealogical one. That's what I expect from my politicians. If their economic plan is so swell, then the obviousness of it means they get good results, and good results gets one a majority. optics != good policy Quote
ToadBrother Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 If you say so. We must put Canadians first right now, not last like we usually do. It amuses me that you want Canada to be this fine Christian nation, that is until actual Christian principles of charity and love come into it, and then suddenly it's "me first". You're like all social conservatives. You could give a damn about your fellow man, you're just in it for yourself. Quote
Alta4ever Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 At this time every party supports increased spending and a deficit as do the majority of Canadians. The people have spoken. I don't support the spending, I don't like it at all, but of all the parties I beleive the CPC would spend the least. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
jdobbin Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 I don't support the spending, I don't like it at all, but of all the parties I beleive the CPC would spend the least. The evidence is that they have spent more than Martin. Nice. Quote
Alta4ever Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 The evidence is that they have spent more than Martin. Nice. It was a statement relative to the stupid stimulus spending that all the sheep seem to think we need. Jack, Dion, Gille and Iggy, seemed to think in November that we needed wild spending because of current market conditions. Not one of them was willing to think of restraint, or even remove their parties take of the tax payers funds even though they think the country is in such trouble and lots of more spending is required. It spoke very loudly, we don't think that we should have to tighten our parties belts but you the tax payer should be saddled with extra financial burden because of it. I wish I had the time to write the book required to vent my frustration with the fickel blanks sitting in opposition. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
jdobbin Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 It was a statement relative to the stupid stimulus spending that all the sheep seem to think we need. Jack, Dion, Gille and Iggy, seemed to think in November that we needed wild spending because of current market conditions. Not one of them was willing to think of restraint, or even remove their parties take of the tax payers funds even though they think the country is in such trouble and lots of more spending is required. We would not have had such a huge problem if Harper could have controlled in wild and woolly spending since 2006. Where were you in all those months when people were saying it would lead to deficit? It spoke very loudly, we don't think that we should have to tighten our parties belts but you the tax payer should be saddled with extra financial burden because of it. It spoke loudly when Harper increased the cabinet from 26 to 37. Wasteful increase and drunken spending. I wish I had the time to write the book required to vent my frustration with the fickel blanks sitting in opposition. And yet you just think Harper's spending the last few years was brilliant, simply brilliant! Quote
Alta4ever Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 We would not have had such a huge problem if Harper could have controlled in wild and woolly spending since 2006. Where were you in all those months when people were saying it would lead to deficit?It spoke loudly when Harper increased the cabinet from 26 to 37. Wasteful increase and drunken spending. And yet you just think Harper's spending the last few years was brilliant, simply brilliant! No I don't think his spending was brillent, there should have been social and arts funding removed to offset every increase to vital sectors. But alas in a minority parliment what do. Some of the spending that was done meets with my approval, because they were items that i beleived were for the good of the country, and had been neglected for many years by a 3 consecutive liberal governments. We would not be in such a problem if the NDP Liberals and Bloc allowed some funding cuts to happen. 2.2 billion and counting gun registry, wasteful drunken spending. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
jdobbin Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 No I don't think his spending was brillent, there should have been social and arts funding removed to offset every increase to vital sectors. But alas in a minority parliment what do. What utter crap. He put funding in for everything and everyone. A lot of it was where cuts had been made by the Liberals in actual total employment in the civil service. Some of the spending that was done meets with my approval, because they were items that i beleived were for the good of the country, and had been neglected for many years by a 3 consecutive liberal governments. More crap. Why can't they keep their spending promises? It isn't like they didn't have their way completely since 2006. We would not be in such a problem if the NDP Liberals and Bloc allowed some funding cuts to happen. 2.2 billion and counting gun registry, wasteful drunken spending. And the Tories keep the plan going? Cowards. And now they spend $600 million on VIA that the Liberals cut. We're headed to huge deficits and the Tories are the ones who led us there. Quote
Alta4ever Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 What utter crap. He put funding in for everything and everyone. A lot of it was where cuts had been made by the Liberals in actual total employment in the civil service.More crap. Why can't they keep their spending promises? It isn't like they didn't have their way completely since 2006. And the Tories keep the plan going? Cowards. And now they spend $600 million on VIA that the Liberals cut. We're headed to huge deficits and the Tories are the ones who led us there. We are headed to two deficits erasing the payments made over the last three years. In all of this and the crap spending we will finnally be receiving helcopters that fly, have equipment that our military despartley needs. We have a real way of saving money, instead of the raping and pillaging people took from RRSP's. Liberal Partisan hacks are slowly being weeded out of high civil service office. Changes were made ot the banking system to the point were it became the best and most robust in the world. We have a government who finnaly are cutting funding to terror organization fund machines herein Canada, like the Tami tigers. A governmetn that actually listed to the farmers. A government and party that acknoledges that their is a Canada outside Quebec and Ont. A government that does its job and doesn't hide behind Supreme court judges to make law (liberal cowards). Why can't the opposition keep its story straight, how many times did the liberals draw a line in the sand, and then cower away and call Harper a bully instead of showing up in the commons to vote. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
jdobbin Posted January 27, 2009 Report Posted January 27, 2009 (edited) We are headed to two deficits erasing the payments made over the last three years. In all of this and the crap spending we will finnally be receiving helcopters that fly, have equipment that our military despartley needs. We have a real way of saving money, instead of the raping and pillaging people took from RRSP's. Um, income trusts. Liberal Partisan hacks are slowly being weeded out of high civil service office. Changes were made ot the banking system to the point were it became the best and most robust in the world. We have a government who finnaly are cutting funding to terror organization fund machines herein Canada, like the Tami tigers. A governmetn that actually listed to the farmers. A government and party that acknoledges that their is a Canada outside Quebec and Ont. And Tory partisan kacks are being appointed every day. Harper had a Tamil Tiger supporter as a candidate in 2006. A government that does its job and doesn't hide behind Supreme court judges to make law (liberal cowards). Why can't the opposition keep its story straight, how many times did the liberals draw a line in the sand, and then cower away and call Harper a bully instead of showing up in the commons to vote. Harper now appoints Senators and Supreme Court judges without going to elections or Parliament like he promised. Another Tort promise in ashes. Then he becomes the big coward and doesn't try to call an election because he can't be sure if the Governor General will gibe it to him. He still doesn't know. Edited January 27, 2009 by jdobbin Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.