Topaz Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 In the latest voting for the Democrats in New Hampshire, what Diebold said and what the recount was are two different results. Diebold has Clinton 683, Edwards 255, Obama 404 but the recount by hand showed Clinton 619, Edwards 219, Obama 365. Since the last Federal election these voting computers has shown they are very unreliable and questionable. www.infowars.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 In the latest voting for the Democrats in New Hampshire, what Diebold said and what the recount was are two different results. Diebold has Clinton 683, Edwards 255, Obama 404 but the recount by hand showed Clinton 619, Edwards 219, Obama 365. Since the last Federal election these voting computers has shown they are very unreliable and questionable. www.infowars.comI thought Edwards finished a distant, distant, third. What are you talking about in terms of the numbers you cite? More then 1300 people voted. Please enlighten us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.