jbg Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 I can prove my case in any fair court with a jury. You have no court case...no matter how florid adjectives you can provide .You post just like government paid poster were instructed to do.What a laugh!!! I am not even a subject of any monarch. I am a US citizen only. I pay no Canadian or British taxes. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
White Doors Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 Can someone here explain to me how we can apply for this government paid poster position? thanks! Quote Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.~blueblood~
White Doors Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 never mind. found it. Quote Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.~blueblood~
jbg Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 Can someone here explain to me how we can apply for this government paid poster position?thanks! Since you found it, will the Canadian government pay a Yank to post propaganda for them? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
g_bambino Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 Since you found it, will the Canadian government pay a Yank to post propaganda for them? Appeal here: Rideau Hall 1 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A1 I'm sure Her Majesty will fit you with a mind-control device right away. Quote
AngusThermopyle Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 I'm sure Her Majesty will fit you with a mind-control device right away. I already had one of those, but then I got divorced and it went away. Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
jbg Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 (edited) Appeal here:Rideau Hall 1 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A1 I'm sure Her Majesty will fit you with a mind-control device right away. Haitians don't cotton much to New York Jewish Democrats. Edited October 25, 2007 by jbg Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
guyser Posted October 24, 2007 Report Posted October 24, 2007 Hatians don't cotton much to New York Jewish Democrats. Just add a bunch of "U" s to the application and she'll think you are from Canada. This qualifies as solicited advice . Please make your cheque in the amount of $200 CANADIAN (oh been waiting to say that I might add) and I will pm you the address. Quote
jbg Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 (edited) Just add a bunch of "U" s to the application and she'll think you are from Canada.This qualifies as solicited advice . Please make your cheque in the amount of $200 CANADIAN (oh been waiting to say that I might add) and I will pm you the address. I'll pass. I don't know enough about Canada to qualify.Where is Canada anyway? At the North Pole? Edited October 25, 2007 by jbg Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
guyser Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 I'll pass. I don't know enough about Canada to qualify.Where is Canada anyway? At the North Pole? Ha! Doncha know? The north pole is canada's. (well almost) But if you go a bit south of that you will be here. It is wonderful in winter, sunshine (after february anyway), but the fruit is tad pricey. Caribou is cheap. You know enough, dare say more than the average Canuck for sure Quote
jbg Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 You know enough, dare say more than the average Canuck for sureThanks, but not really.I know little beyond the beautiful beachfront near Saskatoon. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 I never claimed to have a hansard report that said any of that. Neither did anyone else. And why do you want to see this anyway?Umm... I have posted questions for you to answer. You claimed to have "200 pages of facts" and I asked you to cite them. We are still waiting. Since you consider our current government corrupt you have been asked how your system of government would be different. So far all you have done is whine about how we are all slaves. If you don't have a solution to your perceived problem, or even a few suggestions, then stop complaining. What facts would you like? I've already posted about your Lord Nelson Hotel case. Actually, you have yet to answer my question about why it is you think that case is so important... But what claims have I made that you think require "factual information"? Exactly. Whether this "hansard report" exists or not is irrelevant. Canada is not full of slaves. Paying taxes does not make one a slave. More importantly, even if it did, certain people on this forum have not been able to propose a system that would allow the government to fulfill its role without any money. screwing up my computer and removing my last post is what you do as a government agent. Whether hansard repot exist is very important because it proves the governments ; never told the public of their freedom and sovereignty; as the people in government knew if they did the people would of changed the way the country was governed. If you can't even understand why the lord nelson hotel case is so important it is a demonstration of your indoctrination. It is important because it was a supreme court case which ruled the provincial and federal governments could not change the constitution; and that the provincial governments powers were exclusive; and the federal powers were residual, and if one government had a power the other government could not , have the same power..And the federal government could not assume any power that the provincial governments had. IT also ruled that a constitution belonged to the people ;and not the federal or provincial governments could change it. My question is why can't the supreme court enforce its ruling- because we have a corrupt government who appointed corrupt judges to do whatever they want just like any other dictatorship government. Quote
g_bambino Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Haitians don't cotton much to New York Jewish Democrats. Oh, c'mon. Don't you know the Governor General is fitted with a Queenly mind-control device and is a government paid poster just like the rest of us? Quote
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 "One who has no freedom of action." Has the Queen been visiting you recently, telling you what to do and where to go? Has she, or anyone else, been forcing you to do manual labour of some sort?Do you honestly think that if the Queen was not our head of state we would have no taxes? I assure you, we would have taxes no matter what type of government was in place in Canada. Here is something else to ponder: most people in Canada are willing to pay some level of taxes. Why? Because Canadians generally enjoy (among other government services) their healthcare and education systems and realize that it takes money to pay for that. (Please note, that does not mean that everyone will agree these systems are perfect, but it does mean that Canadians want some sort of system in place.) So if most people are willing to pay at least some taxes, isn't that democracy? The will of the majority and all that. Trying to paint the other person in a discussion as indoctrinated instead of educated is one of the first signs of a losing argument. Although I think that claiming the Queen has made you her personal slave probably wasn't the best way to start your "argument". So all the other countries that have no personal income taxes are much smarter than you ; because they have demonstrated how to operate a government without imposing any personal income taxes. Financial slavery replaced manual slavery because it is a much easer form of control. I have never advocated no form of taxes , just no personal income taxes. Quote
g_bambino Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 So all the other countries that have no personal income taxes are much smarter than you ; because they have demonstrated how to operate a government without imposing any personal income taxes. Financial slavery replaced manual slavery because it is a much easer form of control. I have never advocated no form of taxes , just no personal income taxes. I would rather the Queen took my money through taxes to pay for the things of hers I use rather than her enslaving me to build and operate the things other people use. States have to raise revenue somehow; some may be lucky enough to garner wealth through international sales of natural resources, but they're certainly in the minority. Elsewhere, the money to operate the country has to come from its residents through, yes, taxes. Go live in Saudi Arabia then if you don't want to pay income tax. Again, the Queen will let you do so. Quote
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 I would rather the Queen took my money through taxes to pay for the things of hers I use rather than her enslaving me to build and operate the things other people use. States have to raise revenue somehow; some may be lucky enough to garner wealth through international sales of natural resources, but they're certainly in the minority. Elsewhere, the money to operate the country has to come from its residents through, yes, taxes.Go live in Saudi Arabia then if you don't want to pay income tax. Again, the Queen will let you do so. Is that the best you can do. Quote
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 Quebec persons pay 13.5 % less personal federal income taxes under our charter of equality. Just another way to get more equalization payments, from Alberta taxpayers.. Quote
ScottSA Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 So all the other countries that have no personal income taxes are much smarter than you ; because they have demonstrated how to operate a government without imposing any personal income taxes. Financial slavery replaced manual slavery because it is a much easer form of control. I have never advocated no form of taxes , just no personal income taxes. Can you post a list of the countries that require no income tax? Quote
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 Can you post a list of the countries that require no income tax? some are Anquilla- Bermuda-Dubai-Qatar-Oman-Brune_Panama-Belize-Caymine islands-Turks and Caicos Islands-and the constitutional monarchy of Monaco. And some American states have no personal income taxes.a Quote
g_bambino Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Is that the best you can do. It satisfies your concerns, does it not? I'm beginning to think that paranoid whimpering about enslavement while the door stands open allowing you to freely leave is the best you can do. Quote
no queenslave Posted October 25, 2007 Author Report Posted October 25, 2007 (edited) It satisfies your concerns, does it not?I'm beginning to think that paranoid whimpering about enslavement while the door stands open allowing you to freely leave is the best you can do. no it is not. i don't file federal income tax returns ; and put my actions where i hope to make changes; not like some indoctrinated people who can't make it on their own without government handouts, and have not enough education to understand how corrupt the government is. If everybody left who would you rely on to support you?If you like the queen so much go live with her. http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/greennbaum.html Edited October 25, 2007 by no queenslave Quote
Leafless Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 no it is not. i don't file federal income tax returns ; and put my actions where i hope to make changes; not like some indoctrinated people who can't make it on their own without government handouts, and have not enough education to understand how corrupt the government is. If everybody left who would you rely on to support you?If you like the queen so much go live with her. http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/greennbaum.html Your link is defective and so are you. Quote
no queenslave Posted October 26, 2007 Author Report Posted October 26, 2007 Your link is defective and so are you. search -The Greenbaum speech. Quote
no queenslave Posted October 26, 2007 Author Report Posted October 26, 2007 (edited) It satisfies your concerns, does it not?I'm beginning to think that paranoid whimpering about enslavement while the door stands open allowing you to freely leave is the best you can do. Thirst for justice. http://stopthelie.com/taxes.html http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/tax.htm Edited October 26, 2007 by no queenslave Quote
bk59 Posted October 26, 2007 Report Posted October 26, 2007 screwing up my computer and removing my last post is what you do as a government agent. Oh no! You're on to me! I was just screwing up your computer yesterday, going around deleting your posts. Hilarious. Whether hansard repot exist is very important because it proves the governments ; never told the public of their freedom and sovereignty; as the people in government knew if they did the people would of changed the way the country was governed. First, that's not exactly true. The government could have done it in a press release rather than talking about it in the House of Commons. But even that is irrelevant. People are aware of their freedom & sovereignty. And no one is clamoring for major changes in how Canada is governed. Certainly not in the way you that you seem to be. It is important because it was a supreme court case which ruled... My question is why can't the supreme court enforce its ruling- because we have a corrupt government who appointed corrupt judges to do whatever they want just like any other dictatorship government. You are partially right, and partially wrong. The case simply said that the federal and provincial governments cannot trade or share their section 91 and 92 powers written in the constitution by passing an ordinary law. That's it. And the SCC is enforcing that. It's just that neither level of government is currently trying to modify their powers, so there is nothing to enforce right now. At the time, there was a procedure for how the federal and provincial governments could change certain parts of the Constitution and how the UK Parliament could change the rest (including the part mentioned in the case). After repatriation in 1982 there is a method for amending the Constitution that does not require the UK Parliament. The case is not as important for your purposes as you might think, since there is a clear procedure for how the federal and provincial governments CAN change the Constitution. The Constitution is not, and never was, a document that can never be changed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.