CANADIEN

Or Canada, or the USA, or European countries.

Now, now... dissenter... err I mean Lictor. Nobody here is pointing out that you are anti-Semetic because you are pointing out that Jewish groups were amongst the first to promote multiculturalism. It's because anyone who is contact with you long enough cannot avoid noticing that you hate Jews.

Yep. so the question is simple. If the inferiors (because everyone here knows you view non-Whites as inferiors) won't go voluntarily, should a final solution be considered? Yes, or no. No cowardly escapes to avoid the question. Yes, or no. And no escaping the other question either. How would my neighbourhood be better if my second door neighbour was married to a Caucasian instead of an East Asian, my upper floor neighbours were of let's say British descent instead of Jewish, and if the corner store down my streets were owned by seven-generation Canadians of German descent and Italian immigrants instead of peoPle of Chinese and Middle Eastern origin? And spare me the ad nauseam repetition of the "Black countries for Blacks, white county for everyone, it's genocide" non-sense. HOW WOULD MY NEIGHBOORHOOD BE BETTER IF IT WAS ALL WHITE? And Santa Claus exists, right? You re not fooling me, or anyone else. Mind you, considering the number of times you have been chased out or expelled from forums over the years, i too would pretend to be someone else.

Now, don't be too harsh. How could he know the Soviet Union is gone. When the Berlin Wall fell, nobody posted the info on the Internet But if the experts are not to be involved, who should we rely on? Those who know nothing on the topic at hand? :P

Not to forget Lictor... err I mean, Dissenter.

I do believe that Lictor... err I mean dissenter, would have no problem at all with the idea of eliminating the "problem", if you get my drift. A thing is sure, I can't remember the name he was using a few years back on another forum, but I sure remember him calling for the nuking of Tel Aviv.

Decent parents, or more exactly parents who actually USE THEIR BRAINS, give the skin colour of their neighbour the exact importance it has, that is NONE WHATSOEVER. Nobody here is suggested that "white should become a minority". We are saying, and rightly so, "so what?". My second door neighbours are a white-East Asian couplewith a cute little girl. The two convenience stores down the street are owned, one by a couple of Chinese descent the other by Middle-Eastern immigrant. Upstairs from there's a, dare I write the world because you are likely to recoil in horror, JEWISH couple. And no, I do not believe this is why my neighbourhood is one of the quietest and nicest in town. Now Lictor err I mean Dissenter, YOU explain how this makes my neighbourhood worse than if it was populated with blond Aryans. I know as a fact that it doesn't make my neighbourhood any worse or better. But I need to be entertained - go ahead.

dumbass... talking to yourself, Lictor err I mean Dissenter? We both know that your wetdream is a white -only nation. Which means that sooner or later some non-Whites will have to move away... What's the plan for those who won't go quietly? Go ahead, spell it out.

I am actually more interested to know what his plans are for when the non-Whites refuse to leave.

One more reason why your claim of an anti-white genocide are to be taken as they are... a joke. Now tell me Lictor... err I mean Dissenter, what should be done once non-Whites decide not to get alone with your white-only wet dream?

Now that I finished laughing (again) at the claim that people who (rightly) do not care about the colour of another person are somehow against people of a certain skin colour (namely white)... Tell me lictor... err I mean Dissenter, when will you reveal your plans in case non-Whites refuse to go along with your white only wet dream.

The Internet is a jungle. Which is neither a good, or a bad thing. Just a reality Considering that this is not what I wrote, I'll let you answer the question. What I wrote is that the information on the Internet is only as reliable as it source. Same with books, same with databases, same with what a friend or colleague or whoever tells me over the phone. And with your misrepresentation of what I wrote, you proved me right. And evolution also includes an expending capacity to take advantages of all available resources. Not reducing oneself. --- The problem with your comparison is that books are not obsolete. Amazon.com, e-books, people carrying books on the subway, Harry Potter are proving you wrong. Public libraries are not obsolete either. I haven't been at one lately, but I have heard that the ones in Toronto are actually fairly well attended. In particular the computer stations ( ). The people who make the Toronto Public Library system one of the most used in the world (both on site and on the... Internet ( ) are proving you wrong.

And I can take a BOOK, even an e-book, even a book borrowed from, shall we say it, a PUBLIC LIBRARY, to Starbuck. Good, time for you to stop limiting yourself on how you enjoy it. I know I won't.

... and books, and e-books, and databases available non online, but at... guess where, public library. What a diverse universe of information sources. Especially for those who understand qand appreciate each of them, as oppsed those who think that one in particular is all they need. Soooo... I have the capacity to know that there somethin in the Universe besides the Internet, therefore I MUST be some form of relic from a past age? Well, I might be temptedf to wonder if you were even born when Steven Harper won his first elections, but then children of that age already know the value of a book. :P

We are not talking about centralization of information, but about a public space where people can access information. In another word, not ISP`s.But nice try. And no, the Internet has not placed knowledge into everyone`s hands. No more than the printing press did place knowledge into everyone`s hands. They are just the tools of transmission. Public spaces for access to information (namely public libraries) are how knowledge becomes available to everyone. Feel free to do so. Nobody is forcing you otherwise. You, on the opposite, seem to be bent on limiting access to knowledge to what is on one incomplete platform (the Internet) and to eliminate one public space where EVERYONE can access information. And I happen to know from experience that the Internet is a jungle, and that the information on there is only as reliable as the source of it. Also that not everything is on the Net, or easily available even if on the Net.

dup

dup

We live in a world when knowledge is one of the most important commodities. Publicly funded and owned library are essential places for access to knowledge resources, and they are as important a public structure as roads. Granted, there are always to make public libraries more response to the need of the public. And libaries are becoming and should become more of a virtual place. At the end of the day though, they exist, and should exisit by and for the public. ***** I hav often heard the comment that libraries are not needed because everything is online. No, not everything is online, to begin with. As well, there is no shortage of online resources that are out of reach (for many reasons) of most people. And what is online is often enough unreliable. Public libraries, when well run anjd well-staffed, have proof themselves as spaces where people can access information that in a meaningful way. My past job and university training, for more than 20 years, involved providing access to information. I have ferred people to pulic libraries countless times for their information needs. Not a single time to Amazon or Indigo, and have thread very carefully where Google or Wikepedia were involved.

And there were people arguing all the time that Irish, Italian, East European immigrants were not good enough. Nothing new under the Sun. BTW, Lictor, err I mean Dissenter, since we all know that the real term on your mind is White, do yourself a favour and use it, will you? And I am still waiting for you to tell what should be done with non-Whites here who would refuse to go along with your purity plan.

Call it whatever you want. Your belief that white-skinned people are superior is well-known lictor... err I mean Dissenter. Now, tell us, what should happen to the non-whites living here if they do not get along with your little "white-only" plan?

Darn, and I thought noone else had recognized him. Now, to you Lictor... err I mean Dissenter. How do you propose exactly North America be made white? I strongly suspect that closure of the border, segregation, perhaps even mass deportation, ban of inter-racial relationships are in order. But what else? Especially, what if the ahem inferiors do not want to cooperate? Go ahead, tell us all.

People from the Bloc crossing the floor to support the Conservatives and block the NDP? Not a chance

sup

And they don't the presence in Quebec to get more than two or three seats there (about everybody 6 weeks ago( Now, the predictions: Conservativess 150 New Democrats 70 Liberals 47 Bloc 29 Green 1 Independant 1

The Conservatives are close to a majority. Very close, so they will get their committed voters no problem. Liberals, less sure.