msdogfood

not good for Levan

I have noticed that to!! hmm maybe in October than??

Former Tory spokesman exits Sun TV Steven Chase and Jane Taber Kory Teneycke, a former top spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has resigned from the effort he started to bring a right-leaning TV network to Canada.

Former Tory spokesman exits Sun TV Steven Chase and Jane Taber Kory Teneycke, a former top spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has resigned from the effort he started to bring a right-leaning TV network to Canada.

Afghan deaths focus of special forces probe See this Thanks! Two criminal investigations launched by military police into the actions of Canadian special forces soldiers in Afghanistan probed the alleged improper killing of Afghans, CBC News has learned. Read more: My link

Will someone answer this for me thanks!!.

anyone remember Somalia??? The DND will got thrown under a bus on this one!!!!!!.

How true

ok what about times when private enterprises care for people Is your only option tort litigation?.

So know sees this as a problem?? " C.B.S. is a non-profit organization and therefore not subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms"

he indicted his view oh the show a lot more than he needed to!!

Is This not the true problem??. ................................ The part of this that i have a real problem with is This " judge stated the C.B.S. is a non-profit organization and therefore not subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it is not a government or state actor and views it instead as a private corporation. The ruling is not available in digital form yet or I would have provided the link. One of the groups concerned about the aspect of the ruling is the Canadian Aids Society. The Society feels that since the C.B.S. is considered a private entity, in the future the government could incorporate any of its own departments making them private companies and escaping the rules of the Charter. "

sorry all!

This is one of those times when proper grammar and spelling is probably important. Corrected

true!

The part of this that i have a real problem with is This " judge stated the C.B.S. is a non-profit organization and therefore not subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it is not a government or state actor and views it instead as a private corporation. The ruling is not available in digital form yet or I would have provided the link. One of the groups concerned about the aspect of the ruling is the Canadian Aids Society. The Society feels that since the C.B.S. is considered a private entity, in the future the government could incorporate any of its own departments making them private companies and escaping the rules of the Charter. "

Hi I put this in federal politics because Canadian Blood Services is the managing body of the Canadian blood supply system. On Thursday, Sept. 9/10, Canadian Blood Services won a court ruling that allowed it to maintain its ban against collecting blood from gay men. The only part of the ruling that I am concerned will have a true political impact is that the judge stated the C.B.S. is a non-profit organization and therefore not subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it is not a government or state actor and views it instead as a private corporation. The ruling is not available in digital form yet or I would have provided the link. One of the groups concerned about the aspect of the ruling is the Canadian Aids Society. The Society feels that since the C.B.S. is considered a private entity, in the future the government could incorporate any of its own departments making them private companies and escaping the rules of the Charter. I see their point, however, anyone can sue a private corporation. Does this also apply to charities? I think it does but I don't know. The C.B.S. has an unusual corporate structure. It is non-profit however the board of directors is selected by the Province and by the government of Canada and is funded provincially and federally. If this is the case, how did the judge come to the conclusion that is was a non-profit organization. Anyone want to take a crack at this? If you're a lawyer, that would help. Thanks

I agree!!.

No not at all! I just do not see Tom Clark as impartial.

Yes i agree I just posted the link to it because i did not see that particular one in the thread thats all!

Its going to be a wip vote for the Liberals!.

NO!

Harris/Decima Gender Gap Limiting Both Parties

He was Not impartial at all!!.

he has to large an ego for that!!.