bjre

Who is the "Chinese communist emperor" you refer to?

How do you know that? Are you the original source where the lie coming from? Here are some picures I just have just searched out, do you think they will see bullet? http://img1.gtimg.com/news/pics/19202/19202928.jpg The above link is to a picture shows a college girl student finger point a cop after she cross the road did not follow the traffic regulations and the cop want to ask her to pay fine. There are some other pictures as following: http://hiphotos.baidu.com/%D1%FD%D1%FD%B0%AE%B1%A6%C0%B6/pic/item/a0673c429522b83872f05dec.jpg http://hiphotos.baidu.com/yaoguniang/pic/item/f46bc9d35711b4173af3cf82.jpg http://img.hc360.com/security/info/images/200805/zyy20080508004.jpg.jpg http://hiphotos.baidu.com/jmyly/pic/item/44205bfd820fab65d7887d7f.jpg

Caption this: Obama wags finger at Harper during nuclear summit

You old pal the colonist who killed 100 million aboriginal native Americans. So is this your logic: they have no human right before, let you take away their life? Is there any difference with a murder's logic? How about those western youths?

So now change topic again?

You are a liar. When American bombs take away their life, they did not want to die, when they die in the hate attack bombs, they did not want to die.

Kick Saddam out is nothing, but million innocent Iraqi people dead, and thousands US/UK/AUS/POL youth dead. Why their basic human right to survive has to be taken away?

So use 1998 data to prove you did not lie about 2002 fact? Even if Iraq had WMD before 1998, was those made in Iraq, had they the ability? Isn't those US/CIA gave them?

Lie. before the 2nd Iraq war, no UN inspector find any WMD, and they even ask Iraq to destroy very short distance missiles to ensure Saddam has nothing to fight before US attack it. And Bush still told us Iraq has WMD, and Blare said that too, he said Iraq can attach the west in 45 minutes.

delele

Several years ago Bush said Iraq has WMD before attacking Iraq, but Iraq did not have it. Recently, someone threat people that H1N1 was pandemic, it just passed. You are just another one who try to using the similar technology here. Terrorists were not in Iraq when Saddam was ruling Iraq before US invade it.

It matters only because of the law.

I don't know what it can be called. I don't know if any other did it or not. I did it at that time independently. That means there are too many people can do it, even if no one invent a particular technology in America, it can be invented in other place by another person.

That is also my invention before many others even thinking of it.

I also put it on a webside in China. and used a program developed by myself to increase its click count dramatically, so keep it at the top of the list. But still no market demand at that time, or maybe my sales ability was too not professional.

Has youTube any new idea there? How funny. 20 years ago, I developed computer animation on PC. In 1996, I even put that in Geocity.com and even that I was not the first.

China has too many first, from printing technology, compass, gun power, paper as ancient inventions. As for now a days, too many to mention, the patent number each year is numerous. And many things just not to apply patent and not implemented. Even me had many ideas, when I was young when I was in China, that has not been implemented due to various reasons until many of those are later become popular technologies "invented" by American. Just as what I had once said in this forum: whenever there is need, money, and knowledge, new invention will be there no matter whoever invent it.

It's just a business success, for the technology part, too many people can do it.

After I watched these video from another thread: I feel hopeless and meaningless again. I think nothing can be changed, the world is controlled by those several people and for their profit, all are for that. Then I suddenly find the following, it looks like all are just happening as designed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/business/global/08rail.html?scp=4&sq=china&st=cse BEIJING — Nearly 150 years after American railroads brought in thousands of Chinese laborers to build rail lines across the West, China is poised once again to play a role in American rail construction. But this time, it would be an entirely different role: supplying the technology, equipment and engineers to build high-speed rail lines. The Chinese government has signed cooperation agreements with the State of California and General Electric to help build such lines. The agreements, both of which are preliminary, show China’s desire to become a big exporter and licensor of bullet trains traveling 215 miles an hour, an environmentally friendly technology in which China has raced past the United States in the last few years.

Royal bank and others increased the interest rates recently. Is that controlled by control bank? Why increase it? Who controls the central bank? Had this decision asked the any opinion from the people if central bank made the decision?

I think you are brainwashed by corporate media here. The YouTube video ( ) is from a video that had been broadcast on TV, you can contact Ezra Levant who was in the show to confirm.

There was no massacre in Tienanmen Square, that is what I said. I never said that. I said some people killed due to violence riot. It has been clearly show in the video of post #84 ( )

That's a good point. Some people did that just because they are unable to give any persuasive arguments. Yes, there are children need to be help. But I suspect how much help CAS did overall. Most what I heard, and what I find are negative. The problem they created is most likely larger than the problem they solved. Any if they believe they did a good job, why they fear Ontario Ombudsmen to investigate complains? It is a private company, so it is no doubt that profit is their ultimate goal. There are people already sum up about this: In Canada, you're allowed to have your own political values. But you're not allowed to teach those political values to your kids unless those values have been approved. If you're a parent that teaches "non-approved" political values to your children, the state feels they have the moral obligation to take your children away from you.

I don't answer this question in this thread because it is off the topic and because you are not able to provide a persuasive argument on this topic.