dub

your mr. boyle also believes israel has committed war crimes.

you're the one who used his opinion to discredit amnesty. do you agree with him or not?

this man has a lot of opinions. mr. dancer was the one who used his comment to try to discredit Amnesty International. dancer, bent himself over and gave it to himself. do you also have the same feelings as dancer about amnesty?

she asked for it.. she deserved it... same shit, different pile. i guess you think the protesters in iran also asked for the beating they received because they were captains of their own ships. what about the jews in germany who had a chance to get out of germany but didn't? i guess they asked for it too.

that's good. look at what else Francis Boyle has said: thanx for coming out. about amnesty and apartheid south africa; why don't we see what the anti-apartheid committee chairman has to say about them: you've embarrassed yourself enough. i think it's time for you to take another leave.

you're an idiot. their job is not to prosecute. amnesty international: "to conduct research and generate action to prevent and end grave abuses of human rights and to demand justice for those whose rights have been violated." international red cross: "protect human life and health, to ensure respect for the human being, and to prevent and alleviate human suffering, without any discrimination based on nationality, race, religious beliefs, class or political opinions." HRW: "conduct research and advocacy on human rights." why are you a war crime apologist?

what krusty is trying to say is that she deserved it.

i'm sure there were a few apologists who reacted the same as you to the amnesty report on apartheid south africa as well. by the way, you're mixing up HRW and amnesty. but what does it matter anyway? any criticism of israel's actions is not worth looking into. dancer's conclusion: amnesty, red cross and HRW are all jew haters who don't know what they're doing. thanx for coming back for a good laugh.

it's nice to see a main channel covering this. the zionist apologists don't miss an opportunity to try to turn the table and try to avoid the obvious, when faced with facts. all of this talk about hamas using people as human shield while israel has been accused of doing it by human rights organizations and even by its own court.

right. you've denied the conclusion of the report that israel has committed war crimes. because, you know, amnesty, red cross and HRW are all jew hating anti-semites.

you're an idiot if you can't comprehend the difference between what hamas has done and what israel has done in the latest conflict.

they may not have power to give a sentence or charge the war criminals, but they have the power to pronounce war crimes. many of their reports are used by the international court. in fact, they were behind UNCHR and international criminal court. israel, the 'accused', refuses to defend itself against all of these human rights organizations, including the one led by the UN, because israel knows it has broken international. why is it that israel never agrees to cooperate with these investigations much like mugabe in zimbabwe? amnesty, HRW and red cross have stood the test of law and the interpretation of law. lols. you are a war crime apologist.

i'm referring to the amnesty report that the same war crime apologists like DoP, krusty, bonam and dancer try to deny.

majority of jews in israel are nothing like these guys. unfortunately, it's these crazies who push for and drive the annexation of palestinian land. these crazies are the ones in the settlements. check this out: this is a good example of how their children act and what their mothers are like. they also attack palestinian children who try to go to school:

see DoP, Bonam, dancer and the rest of you die-hards. bc2004 has no shame in admitting that he's okay with and supports a state who commits war crimes. he happens to be above you guys for being honest about himself.

not sure why you find it hilarious. maybe you don't have the knowledge. HRW and amnesty and red cross all adhere to international law in which all of our countries are a signatory to. ADL is a lobby group for the state of israel.

your conclusion is stupid. how is that apologizing for terrorists? i never said suicide attacks or rocket launches are okay. if you punch me and then i punch you in the face and break your nose and make you cry, i wouldn't be the only one who would be at fault. you'd be at fault as well. i did not excuse their rocket attacks. i was simply correcting someone about who provoked the war. are you some kind of robot who doesn't comprehend simple meanings or are you just randomly picking out paragraphs and pretending that i'm apologizing terrorism. what's the problem? i don't disagree with hamas fighting the israeli army and whoever is occupying their land. however, i fully disagree with them launching rockets into israel at cities. so you're wrong again. no it's not. i am showing how he's a hypocrite for calling rocket attacks disgusting while condoning killing palestinians by bombs, rockets and guns. i never minimized any acts of terrorism. you're making shit up again. ditto what? you've made a whole lot of shit up again and tried to present it as a debate? so i'd like to know. what is your reason for apologizing, minimizing and ignoring israel's acts?

yes. this is why i corrected you. there is no doubt that israel committed war crimes. the reports concluded that israel committed war crimes. so what is your reason for apologizing, minimizing and ignoring israel's acts?

it is the question. i don't disagree that hamas committed war crimes by firing rockets. the only reason i'm not talking about it is because no one disagrees that it was a crime. they're no longer "alleged". the reports from all the organizations have concluded that war crimes have been committed by israel. the focus happens due to a few reasons; #1 - israel's war crimes, as reported, are more numerous and many times more ferocious #2 - there are those who try to apologize, minimize and ignore israel's acts #3 - no one disputes hamas' war crimes i have never apologized or minimized any illegal acts committed by hamas. if you have seen me do this, then by all means, show it. otherwise, stfu.

agreed on #2. the mubarak loves the $ he's getting.

eh? did you forget to read the whole comment? israel does receive $3billion a year. no other country receives that kind of welfare handout, consistently for many decades. striking down resolutions that criticize israel's role. giving political support and failing to condemn violations of the geneva convention. how many have you given?

i get it that you war crime apologists like to downplay some issues, but it's a pretty big deal that 3 human rights organizations have put out reports in regards to israel committing war crimes. maybe you people wouldn't be so sensitive about criticism of israel if you abandoned your nationalism and your theory that israel is never wrong.

eh? i'm not disputing amnesty's report on war crimes by both israel and hamas. do you dispute the report?

zionism is a political movement and an ideology. zionism is not judaism. why do you lie so much?

any african countries receiving $3billion a year from the US to spend on weapons? are they receiving political immunity and support by us while they violate human rights? us = the western countries.