Sir Bandelot

No, but thats what he says he's still gonna do, right? Does every post you make include the cute little emoticon, laughing boy?

Kuzadd has it right- bang on:

Obama has already shown himself for what he is, a continuation of current US doctrine. His policy of "reaching out" to the republican party, really just means it's the same old same old. This is the new politics, where bald faced liars tell jokes and wear a grin. It should not be surprising at all for those who are not subject to mass media hysterics that typically occur during election time. The rest are now waking up to the sobering reality, with a hangover

Oh no, they're caught in a feedback loop

But, Obama does it with a nice smile

Apparently when the allies liberated Italy, france, Belgium and Holland, 100 of thousands of people had to flee the fighting, but when the Nazis were there, they did not have to leave. Pakistan reels under Swat offensive "All of Pakistan's major political parties have given their support - along with the United States - to the operation, but with no exit strategy in place, the unfolding humanitarian crisis looms as a bigger threat than the Taliban." http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KE15Df03.html This strategy will not work. Especially if the Taliban offer assistance to the fleeing civilians, food and medical aid as they have done before in parts of Afghanistan.

Yes they did, a multi-cultural country under one common law. And Brits allowed the muslim palace guards to wear their turbans.

Not in his case- more like caused by friction burn Bwahahahaha

Sure, cause you need a new wig

Not quite yet, there are still many arrests and prosecutions taking place. But the day is coming soon. Then we will all smoke a joint on your front lawn, with your daughter

There are no victimless crimes, everything is connected. When a business man embezzles money from a corporation, it has ripple effects that steal potential from other peoples pockets. None of your ancdotes or moralizing addresses the core issue. Its not a question of harm of the substance, that is proven and disproven by countless studies. The question is simpler than that- are the courts the right medium for dealing with drug users, of any kind. Has the drug war been successful. Based on the historical evidence the answer seems to be NO. And today we are hearing that the new US Administration agrees that there has to be a change in the approach to the drug problem. That makes sense, to people who are capable of observing and thinking for themselves. Anyway someone please tell bc2004 that his new government is behind this too, so he can soon relax and start changing his tune. (not allowed to think)

Exactly, like I said... you suck on the tit of power. With you there is no room for debate on any issue, other than following what the power tells you to believe. There is no right, no wrong, other than that which power dictates. It's really very simple

This is the extent of his argument, as apparent with most things he writes- unequivocal support for anything that the government tells him to believe.

Of course, not necessary when Glaxo is your dealer. It's always ok when its the official gang bangers. I got you figured out- whatever your government tells you is ok with you. If they say its black today, BC says "black is good, black is good". If they say it's wite, BC says "whites good, whites all good!" Aint that right, BC

"Mommy, why are your drugs ok then?" Why... because the government says so, of course

Even silly string has its uses

Oh I see, so now its all good

Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Kansas Illinois Maine Massachusetts Montana Michigan Minnesota Missouri Mississippi Nebraska Nevada New York North Carolina Ohio Oregon Washington Wisconsin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Places_that_h...e_United_States And with the announcement from the new US drug Czar today (nice name btw... czar) the list will probably get longer. Then Canada will follow the US example, or Canadians will go to the US to find a safe place to smoke

Wait, lemme get my US flag rollies out, and we'll burn a fat one

I prefer, that whatever we do we don't BECOME Iran

Whenever did I say that, Joebob? Are you a fisherman? Or just trollin...

Its not a bad thing, if you're getting rich off it.

White House Czar Calls for End to 'War on Drugs' Wall Street Journal May 14 WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting "a war on drugs," a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use. Gil Kerlikowske, the new White House drug czar, signaled Wednesday his openness to rethinking the government's approach to fighting drug use. Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach. The Obama administration is likely to deal with drugs as a matter of public health rather than criminal justice alone, with treatment's role growing relative to incarceration, Mr. Kerlikowske said. ... Change you can believe in

"In 1992, Pope John Paul II apologized, saying that the denuncuation (of Galileo) was a tragic error." http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...me=&no_ads= Of course, if you still live in medieval times in your mind, you would not know these things. Yeah he is intolerant, towards your extreme intolerance of tolerance Get help

Right, just like string theory