Hawkins

The problem of atheists is that they are believers of evidence/proof. Evidence and proof however are a delusion (a very powerful delusion). Humans mostly rely on faith to get to a truth. Flying spaghetti is the lack of serious human witnessing/testimonies. This lies the fundamental difference between God and flying spaghetti or Zeus. Atheistic thinking is heavily based on the term evidence. They are educated or rather indoctrinated to think that evidence should be the way in confirming a truth. However this is not true in reality. Evidence, other than science, comes scarcely that humans (in majority) don't actually rely on evidence to approach a truth. They rely on faith instead to get to a truth. This is where the flaw of atheistic thinking is, due mainly to the indoctrination of secular education.Science can be evidenced simply because science is always about a phenomenon which can repeat (infinitive number of times) for humans to do their speculations/observations unlimited number of times. This kind of repeatable truth (i.e., scientific truth) is a very narrow and limited set of truth. Our secular education however mistakenly treats it as the norm of what a truth is. That's why we (atheists that is) keep asking for evidence in backing a up claim in order for it to be considered a truth.In reality, we can't even back one out of the million meals we ever had with evidence. It is because "what we ate" is not something which can be repeatable as a science is. 7 billion humans (not to count those already died) can't even back up one of his past meals with evidence. That's how insignificant evidence is. We don't practically approach a fact of this kind (not repeatable) with evidence. We approach it with faith instead. You simply tell us what you ate such that we can believe with faith to know what you ate. What we actually examine is your credibility and reliability instead of evidence. If you are a friend I can trust, I swallow it right away without a second thought. This flash of a second in getting to a truth is the efficiency of what faith is, in terms of approaching a truth (i.e., what you said about what you ate)!Do we have an alternative way to get to know what you ate? Unfortunately we don't. Science/evidence etc. won't tell what you ate, say, on Jul 11, 2012. Someone wrote down what you ate that day and for others to believe with faith, that remains the only way we could possibly know what you ate.

No I didn't. However, your memory cannot be an evidence until we have a tool to get your memory out for researching. Why do you have to ask question like this anyway?

No. You first need to know how human history is written and passed on! Then you may have a grip on what valid human witnessing and testimonies are. Now let's get back to the question. Why don't you date a history book in the public library near your house?

You must be kidding me. How can you even try to date a book you don't even have the original copy at hand? Why don't you just try to date a history book in a public library near your house to see how old human history can be traced back? By dating such a book, it says humans only have like 3 years of history. LOL.

I already show you logic. No matter how many people are in your camp, your belief is still illogical. That's why it is a delusion for the mass, just as prophesied.

How do you know where the Bible begins? How do human dating methods work? Human dating methods work based on the assumption that God doesn't exist so that earth is in its current location (in terms of time-space) all the "times" from the "beginning". If God exists then this may not be the case. Each time when the time-space of earth shifted due to a need, all your human dating methods are thus nullified! The age of Bible, by certain POV, is calculated by the biblical accounts of genealogy. However, genealogy is never meant to aim for year calculation, as ancient human culture may vary in terms of how genealogies were written and kept. The biblical accounts of genealogy however are accounts of human witnessing to testify that Jesus is from Adam and David, no less no more.

What? To me, the "sons of god" refers to other homo erectus existed. That's why even scientists found Neanderthal genes inside humans. Face it, the Bible is not always straight forward due to limited human knowledge through which a message was intended to be brought forward. As for the flood, it's humans' arrogance to think that they understand all kinds of catastrophes ever happened. By Noah's description, the "flood" covered the top of a high mountain. We however never speculated a flood which can cover the top of a high mountain. So apparently the "flood" is not a flood we commonly encounter but possibly a kind of catastrophes we never knew of.

In accordance to your memory, what did you do or say today but a year ago? Why not educate us?

No we don't. It is a delusion for you to believe we do though. Even in terms of science, we don't rely on evidence to get to a truth. You don't have the evidence that black holes exist before you know for a fact that they exist. 99.99% humans don't rely on evidence to get to this truth. They rely on faith to "know" for a fact that black holes exist.

Humans are humans, their behavior says nothing about if God exists or which one is true.

Humans don't usually rely on evidence because evidence come scarcely and rarely. This is so because the nature of humans is that humans are cut from the direct access of both the past and future. So you can't provide what you yourself did and said as recent as yesterday. You don't have the evidence of your own yesterday, the day before, a week ago, a year ago.....Nor do the 7 billion humans on earth. We have 7 billion humans on earth, if everyone like you can't provide evidence of their deeds yesterday, a week ago, a year ago, then we have 7 billion cases per day which are completely unevidenced, under the assumption that each of us does only 1 thing per day. We generally know what you did by what you or a credible eye witness said, and for us to believe with faith. That's the way how we reach the unreachable past.

So you put all your faith in the pope and not Jesus then expect that you will be saved. Whether the pope is right or not, you are showing your human stupidity anyway.

I read totally different things before and after I am a Christian. Humans are arrogant though they know consently well that human intelligence is limited. Humans are incapable of dealing with the past and are futile about historical events. Yet they think know the past. They eat too much from the Tree of Knowledge to think that they know things and to judge, just as predicted in the very first chapter of the Holy Bible.

Unicorn is not a common belief, nor is it a group belief worthy of speculation and investigation. Human soul is a valid skeptic. Not only that, it concerns your life. It is your belief whether you are on either side of the fence. You believe that it doesn't exist, or you believe that it does exist. Conceptually speaking, soul is a technical term applicable for humans and humans only. Those supernatual entities such as angels are usually refered to as spirits instead of souls.