Alta4ever

Sounds like he actually wants to get the facts out instead of the crap that is being advanced by the liberal MSM.

Dobbin was talking about th deficit.

You know the game played by Chretien and martin to advance their socialist agenda, and further the liberals policy of talking more control from the provinces. Step 1 Cut federal transfers and program funding. Step 2 as the provinces wither and are unable to support the programs, step back in and offer limited one off funds. Step 3 add strings to the funds that remove the provincial autonomy from the program Step 4 set up a federal arm to manage provincial jurisdiction from a central location in Ontario or Quebec Again they didn't solve problems they just created new ones and more regional divides while concentrating power.

We were talking about the deficit.

Ya the liberals created under Trudeau now they think they can fix it? Its much the same as any problems faced by Canada today created under the Trudeau liberals, but those same liberals feel they hold the answer today.

Yet I kep telling you this thread is not about what you are speculating will come from the Conservaitve party or about Harper, it is about what Ignatieff actually said.

I will argue nothing about Harper this is about the liberal leader said. This thread is about Ignatieff wanting to raise taxes.

What happens to tax revenue when economic activity picks up? His increased spending ins't long term programs. They are done when this budget is done.

Any civil servant who's job is duplicated because of the federal government infringing on provincial jursidiction. Not to mention those who look after the federal long gun registry and a whole host of others.

It doesn't need to be done. We have a bloated cival service time to fire some people.

We aren't talking about ifs.... Harper isn't talking about raising taxes it would your leader who wants to get further in Canadians wallets.

Who is it that has the "hidden agenda"

I would like to see the liberals campaign on this again.....

So its impossible to decease spending? Does this mean a return of the carbon tax in liberal policy, a policy authored by the Ignaieff?

http://news.therecord.com/News/BreakingNews/article/520203

I whole heartedly argee. This tactic has been used time and time again by the liberals to remove provincial powers from them and attack the constitution of the country.

Bening a commonwealth nation allows our citizens to sit in the house of lords. It wasn't the british that had the problem it was one PM.

Got anything better then lyrics?

It was given up because of the Liberal Party and Jean Chretien. Lord Black was not the first Canadian to be offered and accept a peerage, and yet they did not have to give up citzenship. This was all about liberal politics.

If you aren't making excuses quit whinning about the ticket, pay it and move on.

There is no such thing as fairness in life. If we advocate to remove federal transfers we should not ask for or accept them.

Whats to poke at i agree with you. We have many would would like to see terroists returned to our soil, but not Conrad, why because he doesn't have the right...I mean "left" political leaning.

It doesn't matter we don't need to take any hand outs had the premier and the finance minsiter done their jobs properly and followed the law we would not have this whopping deficit.

We should not get a penny of it, Harper should tell Ed to stuff it.

The speed limit was 70 you were doing 149 you have gotten what you deserve. Take you punishment and slow down next time. Step one. Time to relize you are not a victim step two. Accept responsibility for your actions step three. learn from you mistake (in this case slow the heck down)