jazzer

Amish, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons.....

deleted

I have multiple sclerosis and I used to get the flu often. Then I began taking the shots (over 20 years now) and haven't had the flu ever since. It's hard to prove that it is the shots that have kept the flu at bay but I guess I really don't care.

Then there's this from an interview with Tim Russert: Russert: Were you favor of the war in Vietnam? President Bush: I supported my government. I did. And would have gone had my unit been called up, by the way. Russert: But you didn't volunteer or enlist to go. President Bush: No, I didn't... link

So if a pregnant women is murdered, don't we charge her murderer with two counts?

A little jealous of the millions she deserved?

Or Morgentaler.

Why stop there. Let's just burn them at the stake.

"Reasonable apprehension of bias" is pretty powerful stuff since it renders the entire report null. There was plenty of factual evidence (proof) for Gomery's bias. Read the report.

Gomery was proven biased thus nullifying his report. Until something legally conclusive comes along, Chretien is in the clear.

Irony of all ironies. Can't blame those "liberal" judges for this one. link So now what? Will Harper appeal?

Welcome to the Conservative Party method of discussion. Instant insult upon disagreement.

Best tell that to the political parties who tend to rely on them.

Seems to me you hate Liberals. But like a good right winger you put yourself in personal attack mode, like your friend BC. What the problem is the right wing can't apparently take the heat.

Another right winger that has trouble with not only reading, but comprehension as well. Nothing in that post puts the USA and Bush in a bad light. I was responding to BC who readily admits he demeans and attacts any poster that disagrees with him.

We don't seem to obsess over ratings like you guys. I use the U.S. ones because they unfailingly point out the approval rating and overall performances of your Presidents. To me they are an indicator how what the people think. I know that voting day, though, is the only poll that's important.

Is it really necessary to list ALL the failures? I'd be here all freaking night. Truman is listed because that's pretty much where American terrorism started. I could be wrong, it may have earlier. I don't seem to remember when Ford did any bombing but I'm sure you'll fill in the blanks. So yup, dropping bombs does not a president make. My favorite tho is the shock and awe fiasco on Baghdad presented like a movie. Nice touch there.

Tell that to Harper. While on one had he says he doesn't govern by polls, he using the info to decide when to call an election. Give me a break.

That's the American way don't you know. You guys think you're the best, it's in your commercials and movies, it's in your saluting every flag you see, wearing lapel pins and flag clothing. You say something like "We're the best country in the world" enough times, you believe it. Remember Hermann Goering or Joseph Goebbels? You've been led to believe your the most powerful because you have more weapons. But see, your economy is in the toilet, and you've had to borrow how much from China? 40 million + with no heath care? Corrupt politicians (yes we have a few too) from both parties, invading a country that had nothing to do with 911, Mission Accomplished turns into perpetual war costing thousands of lives. But not too many countries are buying your propaganda anymore. Yep a fine country you have there.

Hmm, let's see: LBJ's only redeeming feature was bring civil rights on board - otherwise a failure. Richard Nixon might have had a great foreign policy and then watergate killed him - another failure. Ford - weak leader, failure. Jimmy Carter - need I say more. Bush 1 - wishy washy, Gulf War slightly redeemed him but overall - failure. Clinton had the only favourable polls - liked by majority of people most all the time, success. Bush 2, don't get me started - failure. And Truman with his bomb dropping on innocent people -failure. I'm sure you'll pick this apart but that's okay. It's only my opinion.

Are you that daft? How long did Bush stay up there? I don't play favourites. Any president who had these types of ratings would definitely be a failure in my books, Democrat or Republican.

I'm just responding to the "immigrants built our country." It's a different time now, and no, I'm not happy with the baggage the current lot seem to bring with them.

Thanks for making my point. Steady decline pretty much from 911 on. All that's left is the death knoll.

I'm not doing anything worse than the Martin and Liberal haters did/do.

Well we all know that if the majority of Historians provided polls that showed a positive Bush approval, you'd probably claim the Historians were right wing.