Jump to content

ScottSA

Member
  • Posts

    3,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ScottSA

  1. Thank you Mikey *patting you on the head* Now trot along.
  2. What a galloping strawman! Toodles, Mikey.
  3. Most of these people have psychological problems far beyond their sexual identity issues, which are quite disgusting enough, so it's no wonder she/he/it was dumped.
  4. The Conservatives have all the credibiltiy they need. There's a global debt crunch in the works, probably heralding a severe recession or worse, possibly much worse, and the airy fairy crowd is worrying about Just how much we want to amplify the economic problems by tackling a "problem" that may or may not exist, and that may or may not have anything to do with CO2 even if it does exist. It's just astounding.
  5. As usual, you're only partly right. This episode, for example, is 21st century Nigerian cultural, just as the Salem witch hunts were 17th century American cultural (although in that case something of an aberration, since it had only been common in the 13th century). Islam also has culturally inspired nasties, like female genital mutilation and bagged women. But the doctrinal difference is, of course, that Christians cannot appeal to the New Testament to validate these actions, while Islam can. Further, this is an isolated case of clearly bad behaviour, which explains why the spoon gagged brigade is eager to jump on it, while the daily death toll of Islam's latest victories (people killed by Muslims in the name of the "prophet") ranges between 10 and hundreds. There is no equivalency here. Sorry.
  6. No one can make women be more virtuous, unless it is other women readopting virtue as a norm, and that won't happen until we as a society readopt some of the virtues we've lost. The trouble is that since the 60s we've been practising hedonism and pretending it's freedom, and one way or another we'll return to a stae of civilzation. One way is to allow the inroads of 7th century barbarians; my prefered way is to rediscover western Virtu ourselves.
  7. Because we don't have sharp claws, thick pelts, or four legs, would be my guess. Plus, the question supplies its own answer, for those who have the intelligence to see it.
  8. I see we've been reading the Protocals again. It's the Jooooooos!
  9. And that way we wouldn't have to listen to the whining. Trouble is, it would be about ten minutes before they starved to death, or froze to death, or started showing up at our hospitals in poor shape, and their leadership, like recovering amnesiacs, started remembering other treaties carried down by "oral tradition"...
  10. I think you're way out on a limb here. There is absolutely no indication that Hitler's particular pathology had anything at all to do with "bullying," and indeed there is nothing from his childhood to suggest that he was in any way a bully. In fact, quite the opposite. From all accounts he was something of a well-liked loner, and later a well-liked and respected soldier. In fact, his personality seems to have evolved later on, and the inputs seem to have more to do with the adulation he received and the events of him later stepping into his own Fuhrer-myth - originally conceived to describe someone else. Stalin, along with Saddam Hussien, apparently were bullies, of sorts, at least, but Mao wasn't, and Mao killed more Chinamen than Stalin had Russians to kill. Caligula was a bully, but Napoleon wasn't. Attila might have been but Edward Longshanks and Henry V weren't. In fact, from all appearances, bullying and nasty leadership have nothing to do with each other. There is no correlation. What you seem to be doing here is elevating "bullying" to the top of the current pantheon of evils by associating it with Hitler and Stalin. Bullying is normal behaviour, usually confined to the schoolyard. So is letting society teach bullies a lesson, which it has done, quite effectively, for generation upon generation. Lots of kids try it (dipping pigtails in inkwells), and until relatively recently it would be dealt with with a birch switch or an after school fight, after which 9/10s of chastened bullies would slink home, never to bully again. It's only now, when immediate society has been made powerless to intervene, that bullying has become something more. Bring back after school fights and stop feminizing society, and we'll damn some stop seeing masculinity driven underground to manifest in this sort of way.
  11. I am often angry at my daughter, just as I was at her older sister. I manage not to kill them. And I never once got angry at them because they refused to bag their heads in public acknowledgement that they were lesser humans because of their sex.
  12. I think lots of you too, you obviously naive lollygag. This has absolutely everything to do with religion, and a refusal to integrate. What exactly do you have against an "Eurocentric Christian only agenda?" Let me rephrase it: under what moral imperitive do you suggest that we (meaning Eurocentric Christian based society) should be compelled to allow 7th century barbarians to set up shop here and maintain barbaric customs? You can attach all sorts of 60s era pseudo-intellectual nomenclature to your manufactured scorn, but you know what? Euro-centric Christian only "white" society has every right to have an agenda...especially if that agenda involves saving our society from sociopathic deathcults. Everyone else has an agenda, but somehow that never seems to get quite the same degree of scorn that "Eurocentric" agendas do. Why is that?
  13. The "world" being "brought together" is a grand old idea. Rome, Napoleon, England, Marx (Lenin), and Hitler all tried it too, but unfortunately it means a lot of people die to no real effect. Now we're trying it under the assumption that barabarian tinpot dictators, formed into a talkshop and funded by the US, will do it so much better. I vote the UN disbands, goes home, and shoots itself in the head.
  14. At least the scientific community is beginning to talk about it instead of hiding behind Momoesque wordplay to deny that it even exists.
  15. Oops, you forgot to pay your taxes, so I guess that means you won't be helping out with this Big Huge Nasty Mean Crisis!!!!!!! of Epic Proportions HAaAALp!!!!11!1!1!1!1! either, eh?
  16. Oleg, could you trot along and plague some other poor unsuspecting thread with your deep metaphysical TRVTHS from left field? If you're running short, here are some more LINK. Dude, you didn't pay your taxes, and now you want all the other taxpayers to pony up while you whine about it. Grow up.
  17. Hey Momo...I have news for you: tax farming was common in the republic and early empire, but had been almost entirely replaced long long before the 5th century. So solly, more reading is needed. Try to avoid Wiki, though; when there is an ongoing debate about something, the last place in the world you want to quote for sources is the battlefield.
  18. You obvious need to bone up on how the Roman patron system worked. The "upper classes" consisted of landowners who, by 410 in Britain, had few if any connections to the Empire outside tax levies. I have a feeling they didn't follow Constantine III just to make sure he'd keep taxing them. Furthermore, the vast bulk of Romanized society was agrarian, and without any means of packing up their fields, I can't imagine why they would leave in the absence of any (then) apparent danger. The exodus to Britanny took place later. Read more, pontificate less.
  19. This is hilarious. The Global Jihad grinds out it's horrific monthly death toll; Cair, Cair-can, and numerous "moderate" organizations siphon millions upon millions into court cases challenging security and cultural mainstays in the west; and further millions convincing sheep and smug liberals that to argue against it is "racism" and "Islamophobia;" yet some Islamofascist comes up with a cute Goebbelian scheme to put the Christ back into Christmas, and we're all supposed to be about heaping praise on them? Errrrrr, no thanks. In any event, it's not the 7th century savages who are offended by Christmas; it's lilly white liberals who think they ought to be; or at least think Christ should be re-crucified, but more quietly this time. I'm noticing quite a groundswell, or backlash against calling Christmas "the Holidays" this year. I'm even starting to send emails back to companies who deal with me, suggesting that they use the auld terminology.
  20. Well, there's probably quite a bit we can learn from the CFC hysteria, as long as we're willing to learn. Are you? Oops. Billions upon billions down the drain, entire industries shut down, hundreds of jobs lost, and well, maybe CFCs weren't all that bad after all. Oh well, on to bigger and better giant apocalyptic scares, like Y2K! Act NOW!
  21. That's because you live in a white upperclass neighbourhood. Hmmmmm...I wonder if that means anything....?
  22. Utter nonsense. Not only is there no evidence of any kind that anyone but the legions and their immediate followers left (remember, they were anticipating a return), but there is no written indication from the Romans themselves that anything even remotely close to a mass exodus happened. You're just making sh*t up now.
  23. Whether my position is ideologically motivated or not, it doesn't change the actual facts. Clearly the saxon invasions involved more than a few war bands; they involved massive immigration. Mass immigration was hardly uncommon at the time, and in fact the entire Germanic world was well documented as on the move at the time, so it's not a leap of faith to suggest that at least three tribes came to the undefended shores of a rich land just waiting for the taking. In fact, suggesting otherwirse is not only ahistorical, but requires the suspension of common sense.
×
×
  • Create New...