punked

No the reason is he killed his own plan when he called an election in October. Remember that? He had started the process of reform then called an election.

No it is an issue becuase Harper railed against Senate appointments for the last 8 years and now is doing it. Making him a liar.

I award you best post of the day.

I think if anyone is Not Canadian it is not Elizabeth May it is you. I mean honestly she believes in the things this country stand for. The country you want is Italy during WW2 I think you better build a time machine and head on back.

I bet they brainwashed you in Bible school to think the Bible is great and that we should brainwash people. Why should I listen to you you are brainwashed. PS that was a illustration of what an arguement with you feels like.

HAHAHAHA I get it you are a character like Steven Colbert. It is ironic, please tell me you have been being ironic the whole time you have been on the board.

I think Indians would say different but it still begs the question.

You are just giving me a headache please stop. So what about those who have fought and died to start new countries, IE India. When they were born India was part of Britain who should they have been loyal too. You are making a weird rule which is not only stuipd but that seriously does not make sense.

Where they all English?

So you think John Turner was a bad PM? Maybe anyone who has ever left the country should never be PM too.

The point that Harper has gone back on his world while the NDP are ready to kick members out of their caucus stands regardless of you responding or not and you know it.

Yes I do.

What outsider she has probably lived in this Country longer then you.

And give them out even when they say they want to change the system and have an elected Senate. That was the point from the start. Glade we reached it. So the Party does not accept the Senate seats they just give them out.

As a party they do no accept Senate appointments ,or the Senate for that matter, was the point. That point stands, becuase one member of the party did something does not mean the whole party condones it. You are playing guilt by association and that is why you are wrong.

And John Turner was born in England. You point is you would rather make someone look bad by ignoring the facts then actually act Canadian. Great. Turner was our PM only 25 years ago now you are saying anyone born outside the country should not even be allowed to hold a Senate seat?

No someone who use to be NDP accepted a senate seat. Much like someone who use to be NDP is the MP for Toronto Centre.

Yah because living in Canada for the last 34 does not qualify her to voice her opinion. Infact you must live in Canada for 35 years to get the right to vote or be in the Senate. Wait one second that is not true at all. In fact their are many people who were born in Canada who have lived her less time then her.

No we imply unlike the Cons when we talk about the Senate we don't just do it to get elected we believe in what we say. The party acts on their redirect and is willing to give up things like this to stand their ground. Unlike Harper apparently.

Considering they represent 20% of Canada I think they have a little bit of a right.

Once and NDP member always a NDP member right?

Sigh yes you pointed that out right after someone else mentioned as soon as she was pointed they kicked her out. Making her NOT a member of the NDP party.

And was kicked out of caucus the problem with your post was that you didn't mention that making the post look hyper-partisan.

OMG NOT unsubstantiated rumors well you changed my opinion with something that is probably made up and lie.

Wow one, you are right there will be so many NDP members if the coalition goes through, cause one person who got kicked of the cacus got appointed. That was the point remember, it was that Cons think if the coalition goes through the Senate would have so many appointments to the Senate.