Jump to content

Accountability Now

Member
  • Posts

    2,890
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Accountability Now

  1. The denier mindeset? Why would I do that when you have done such a great job of showing the 'alarmist' mindset. Let's look at this shall we. We had MightyAC who is the most logical 'warmie' on this forum also addressing On Guard regarding the idiocy being stated regarding humans producing CO2. It took eyeball one post to come out and say that yes humans produce it. Even Wilber came around once it was explained. Then there are the resident 'alarmists' on the forum. On Guard still doesn't believe humans produce CO2 and the waldingo is going around with grand deflection and dishonesty so that he doesn't have to address the situation. Pure alarmist tactics. Is this what you do? Cover up shit so it doesn't make you look bad? HIDE THE DECLINE. THE HEAT IS IN THE OCEAN. Man...you guys are just full of this stuff aren't you. Throw out a few more of your waldoisms....because I have never heard you say real gold before. Again...the kids must think that one is cool hey?
  2. Yup....you say NOTHING once more. Wait what was that you said???? "I didn't see anyone disputing it". BAMMMM...4 examples down your throat. You honestly have no clue do you? You just spew the same broken lines repeatedly at people hoping they just give up because the reality is you have NOTHING. You sir are INSIGNIFICANT!
  3. Fessed up about human production??? Where??? Are you on drugs or just following your mentor's dishonest ways?
  4. That's not true as proven by your constant deflection from my question of do humans produce CO2. I just gave up asking as I knew your dishonesty was not worth tackling. You asked a couple times...and that's a brazillion? What is a brazillion anyway? Another cool term the kids are using now a days? Like I said waldo, I answered the question like an adult would. I hope you will do the same when you finally grow up. I've already shown you the two posts consisting of Wilber and On Guard. Wilber has come back and shown that he gets it but your mini me still insists that we don't produce CO2.....DO WE WALDO???? DO WE???? And of course you say you see no one disputing these comments either?????? Here's a good start on what has transpired since you obviously can't keep up in the conversation. As for the initial 'phony' comment, that was made by your mini me to different member...not me. The only thing phony in here is your excuses for being such a hypocrite. My intervention in all of this was to correct the misunderstanding that certain members had regarding CO2 production from humans. I made no inference of this being any sort of cause or relationship to global warming....AT ALL. In fact I went on record as stating the amount was INSIGNIFICANT....a word that you can't seem to find in your dictionary. The only strawman is on your end assuming that I was making such a connection. Seriously....you suck at this.
  5. Yes...the Monty Python clip accurately mirrors your unwillingness and or inability to answer the very basic question being discussed....do humans produce CO2. Of course, instead of answering the question you decide to ask a new question to protect yourself from having to side with a so called denier. How sad!! Having said that, I have no problems saying that human breathing does not build up in the atmoshphere as the capabilities of natural carbon sinks are large enough to handle the CO2 output by respiration. See waldo...that's how you answer a question as an adult. Of course, this has NOTHING do to with the fact that your warmies didn't even know that humans produce CO2. NOTHING!
  6. I see where you are struggling. You don't know the definition of insignificant. Here: in·sig·nif·i·cant ˌinsiɡˈnifəkənt/ adjective adjective: insignificant too small or unimportant to be worth consideration Seeing as how I have already stated the breathing is insignificant then by definition it clearly means its not worth consideration. But yet you childishly go off on a tangent stating that I am drawing some relationship when I have repeatedly stated it is INSIGNIFICANT!!!! What other words do you need defined? I believe they teach kids how to use a dictionary in grade 2 or 3.
  7. You show childish tendencies. Perhaps it's your poor reading and comprehension skills. Perhaps it's the tempers you throw when someone doesn't agree with you. Perhaps it's your close minded attitude. I've also noted kids tend to lie when backed into a corner. Resemble anyone? You've proven to act like a child on many levels....hence the point about letting the adults talk. PS...I've already stated human breathing is insignificant a number of times. Come on...even a fifth grader would have caught that by now!!!
  8. Shhh waldingo. The adults are talking. Go back to your drawings. When you get passed the grade 5 topic of cellular respiration then....maybe then we can introduce you to junior high science
  9. You are so freaking deluded that it's not even funny anymore. Perhaps your dishonesty comes naturally as the fantasy world you live in tells you it's ok!
  10. Get it out of me? I had to post it three times and pretty much spell it out for you. Yet you still come up with this "I knew it all along" BS. You are priceless waldo. The most dishonest person on this forum BY FAR. Have fun conversing with yourself. I trust you are used to it by now.
  11. I didn't want to pick it apart too much. On Guard is still struggling with the basics of it. Also, waldo spent a lot of time drawing it so I didn't want to hurt his feelings.
  12. Love the emoticon. So waldo. If people don't know something as simple as human produced CO2 then what purpose do they serve in talking about global warming? Furthermore, if people like yourself are just going to deflect and be dishonest with the hopes of not letting their side down then what's the point? Who does that help? You could have easily ended this by letting your warmies in on the well known secret that humans do produce CO2 however it would have KILLED you to actually side with a 'denier' even though this is basic fact. This speaks volumes about the distance you would go just to protect your warmie mindset versus having honest, intellecutual conversation. Your thread is about the denier mindset. Your little charade here was concrete proof of the warmie mindset and its defensive and closed minded tactics.
  13. Wow...you really do fail to comprehend. This is amazing. My quoted post (one that is visible for all to read and comprehend if they have such capabilities) states that I was NOT implying anything and furthermore I had outright stated that CO2 from breathing was insignificant. You know...the same point I made that made your faux outrage explode across the screen in your first response. In order to avoid wasting any time (simply because you are not worth it....I will repost the point I made. I will hold your hand on this once again waldo so that you can finally get your head wrapped around it. I'm sure you know which one of these categories is directed at you...Mr. Dishonesty! Let your response filled with your standard nothingness and random waldoism favorites (you know....clearly, bluster, bumbling, Harper/Harper Conservatives, emoticon, emoticon, emoticon)
  14. Oh its there. I can't hold your hand through this bud.
  15. Just stated my point. Please, for the love of science, try your best to slowly read and comprehend. Your whole outrage started when you failed to read/comprehend my initial statement. I see that you continue to do so. Either you truly can't read or your dishonest ways continue. I am quite certain its the latter.
  16. Thank you. Finally someone with honesty and the intellecual capacity to acknowledge this scientific fact. I am not implying that at all. In fact I have outright stated that the amount of CO2 produced from breathing is insignificant to what we produce from burning fossil fuels. Here are two times in this thread that I said it. How can we have honest, intellecutual conversations about something so complex as global warming when people aren't being honest or have the intellectual capacity to understand something so basic as cellular respiration?
  17. I know...you don't get it. I've been saying that all along. Thanks for finally admitting it. You could have saved a whole lot of time by just saying that at the start
  18. Yes one involves the production of CO2 and H2O and the other doesn't
  19. Your explanation to the picture is talking about humans peeing. Not even close to breathing!
  20. You know we have 10 systems in the human body. We're talking about breathing
  21. Humans are not the whole picture. Do you not get that?
  22. Perhaps you should look at the picture and see what is coming from the human! It's sad the public education system failed you so badly
  23. Hey waldingo....do humans produce CO2? Yes or no?
  24. Why can you not answer a most basic question?
×
×
  • Create New...