KrustyKidd

And like you said, it can be forged so the only reason he does not produce the other long form is that he either has not forged it yet or, it is worth over a hundred thousand dollars to obfuscate.

You mean the stae as per the UN Resolution 181 that they defended by using land which they were attacked from? The current Jewish population of Iran is .05% and the Muslim population of Israel is 20%. Your point is what? That Iranians barely tolerate Jews and award them patches to signify them as Jews while Israel embraces Muslims? If so, you have succeeded.

It seems like somebody has done a lot of research on the matter so, without a source and, given the anti Jew hatred the individual who posted those numbers has, I would have to suppose they are in the extreme.

Let's see the original long form.

Yes, sadly there are some non Arab countries that have the extermination of Jews as their part of their policy. Just as individual groups in Gaza and the rest of the Arab world have.

You betcha. Obama did just that.

No biggie. He corrected it and it's done. I can understand how the Palin Derrangement Sydrome affected even he as she is fair game for her power and prestige that she exudes that threatens the left wing with. So much so that even 14 year old kids are fair to insult. Ah well, more moose jokes to come forth as Hussein's popularity drops and Iran goes nuclear without a peep from him................yawn.

When they are proven not to be then peace will prevail. your opinion means little to Israel's security, so many wish those words to be true that they must be careful not to allow all those with that intent to prevail or, even have the power to attempt to enact any part of it.

Obviously real enough to spend a virtual fortune on lawyers rather than producing it or, forging another. Whatever, transparency is Bush's style, not Obama's. Despite what he fed the Kookaid Krowd during his bullshit speeches prior to election time. His policies are Bush's, his rhetoric is Carter's. At least he is smart enough not to have them the other way around. All he has to do is come to terms with how messed up his left wing supporters were as once he does, he can move the rhetoric over to match his policies.

Why don't you demonize those fucks Benny?

How much would it cost to forge the long form birth certificate that Barry refuses to produce yet, spends hundreds of thousands of dollars to obfuscate?

His goal as President of the US should be to promote freedom in all it's forms no matter which candidate benefits. That means freedom to demonstrate peacefully, freedom to have fair and honest elections where hand marked votes in a country such as Iran are tabulated in a mere two hours before a winner is declared. In short, there is nothing nefarious about promoting freedom and, as the unoffical leader of the free world, he should weigh in rather than remain silent. 'Evil occurs when good men do nothing.'

I talked with the aunt of a girlfriend I had once in Israel in '79. She was a twelve year old girl in '48 and remembers the broadcasts from the Arab radio stations. All similar to this; She said it was terrifying. Couldn't understand where all that hate came from and why they would want to kill her. Six nations amassed on the partition borders of Israel to exterminate every last one of them in May - and failed. Since then, nothing has changed whatsoever except the comparative degradation of power that the Arabs have and, the ability of Jews to defend themselves. When the powerless change their goals, then things will change. Until then, Israel cannot allow hateful freaks to kill their people. Even to risk that is insanity. When all understand this, and, make true peace overtures then things can begin to change. If peace is the goal, then peace should be the motive with land, money and cooperation by products of a valued peace. Not the other way around where they still hate the Jews but will accept them barely only if they get certain things.

It 'twas Bonam. I just snickered and took the opportunity to further inject some reality to those who think in only one hateful dimension, and, leave those with this quote from the original leader of the Arab League; And some feel that allowing weapons to pass through with crayons is a good thing. I think that maybe, with this sentiment never fully adjusted, that Israel has every right to be skeptical of sincerity and wishes to ensure that no weapons are being passed through along with necessities. Buddah boom!

Astute post Kimmy. I believe that Dave's ego is doing the hurt right now as evidenced by his bullshit apology which was more similar to just a humor shtick rather than an apology and hence, had to redo the thing for something more convincing. That must have killed him inside as he is very self centered as he never lets anybody to be funnier than he. The other thing that has the left and Letterman in a snit is that she has been easy pickings for so long, so long that it has been almost habitiual to make a joke about her. Fear of 2012 I suppose. One of the most respectful and human politicians around and they have to make her the continual but of jokes. Letting Biden and Edwards slide time after time. Ah well, this time, they can make all their excuses but Letterman's apology speaks volumes about how screwed up their hatred is for somebody that is refreshingly and actual human being and, a politician that they would stoop this low and break their own morals for defense of the underdog (children minorities etc.).

No Bonam, I do not. Did you know that Palestinians immediately rejected Partition and resolution 181 and in fact, from May of 1948, have attacked Israel without ever making a peace that even they themselves, to this day, could accept. Not being able to fight directly, they smuggle in missiles and bombs in order to kill Israeli women and children (ooops, once in a while they screw up and actually kill a soldier.) So, to Israel, (who naturally, like any other government on the planet) holds the protection of it's tax base as it's number one function, placing Palestinian security and paper products in any wild assed priority is a non starter. A lot of things can change and it's time for it. However, one thing has not changed and that is expecting Israel to give up the security of one person in order to placate people who are out to kill every last one of them.

Ever see Dave's frumpy pig of a wife? That's humor! Oooops. Sorry for that. No, really sorry.

Holy! My 15 year old daughter is a War Monger and I didn't even know it. Her education fund has Lockheed Martin and GE in it. The shame! I'm the father of a corporate elitist in the military industrial complex. Benny I see. These ones are just made up.

I have an idea, don't use the border crossings to move weapons in through. Then once a bit of trust is built up, paper will move somewhat faster.

Well, only those who invest their money in stocks and mutual funds. Like your grandmother, sister, teachers, iron workers etc. LOL your evil gramma, killing and plundering for retirement.

So all numbers should be divided by forty. Wondering, how does this support your claim that Israelis receive more US government money per person than US citizens considering that all the aid is in the form of military assistance and, that virtually all ***US government money is in aid of US citizens hence, the former is impossible to be greater than the latter making your argument null and void. Also wondering, the site where you got this from, could we call it unbiased or, does it only have anti Israel facts and figures? Not that it really matters as those who are motivated by hate generally invent what they can't find. Edited to add.... ***Even the aid to Israel is deemed on behalf of the US people in order to support an ally which US policy deems of value to the US people. Hence, aid given to Israel technicly is money given to the US people in the form of a foreign policy benefit.

I certainly don't either. And, to me, it has zero to do with 'family values.' If he were single and a former porn star it would matter little however, this man is a rat who cheated on his wife with the wife of a friend. (Unless of course, it was by mutual consent in a swapping sort of thing which I doubt it was.) Anyways, if one can be dishonest to those closest to you, then you certainly can be dishonest to people you don't even know. So, when all things are equal, vote for the person who has not proven they are a dishonest rat like this .

You know, I like Obama and the way he keeps Bush policies but does it with finesse and explanation. What I hate is his inexperience and uppity assumptions that Bush was wrong on everything and has to change everything only to discover that he can't for very valid reasons. I'm not going to go on with how much of an idiot he is as he certainly is smart enough to not just do what he promised but, to just go out and say he is going to do something and then later recant is the sign of somebody that just has no understanding of the office he is in. Wise up Obama! Golly. You know, it's been over a hundred thirty days and he hasn't done one original thing? Everything he has done Bush was going to do except only when the time was right? As Obama realizes as he has scaled down his time frames on Gitmo and Iraq.

I wouldn't vote for him. He throws his woman under the bus he'll do it to his own party, country and values too.

Ya. It's five hundred dollars per person. Are you going to tell me that per capita, the average tax bill including income tax of the US citizen is less than five hundred dollars? Golly. You have every American wishing you were running their tax system! Ooooooooo. And how many Hams leaders are being charged? Nope. Saying that they have absolutely no reason to do anything as long as they are being attacked. Really quite simple as it is war and has been ever since day one in '48 when they were abiding by Resolution 181 and the Arabs refused it from it's inception. You know ..... immediately. The intifada, Hamas, more attacks and Israeli deaths. Why would they not be able to get away with mass exterminations? Heck, every loon thinks they are doing it anyhow. And, removing US support just might make this a popular thing to do rather than give up security in any way shape or form. I suppose this is what you are after isn't it? To push Israel into taking shortcuts? The only shortcut they will accept is to ensure their own security. If settlements helps them then they will. If making peace will do it then that is what they will do. Attacking them, threatening them and cutting off aid won't do anything. Easy. Since the first time I went to Syria and Israel in 1978 there was a saying that proved itself time and time again and that is 'A Palestinian never passes up a chance to lose an opportunity.' Been there three times since then and followed the progress (and yes there has been progress) but that phrase has held. You always seem to take an anti Israeli side, even when it has nothingn to do with Israel such as the Iranian thread. I have no side to take. I see Israel dong something they should not do but, understand that Palestinians have no history of even agreeing with one another so, why should Israel base their security on a bunch of loose cannons who can't even come together to make a peace offering? Heck, they refused it from day one and continued in one way or another since then so, why shouldn't some faction be allowed to make use of the land while Palestinians fight o=amongst themselves and kill their own women and children in numbers that the UN should be investigating with the vigor or an anti Israeli witch hunt?