Remiel

What makes you think that some billions not spent in Africa would have been spent well somewhere else?

That may yet turn out to be true, but the decision to not intervene can be as paternalistic as the decision to intervene. Once you have decided what " primitive cultures " can handle, you have already robbed them of the choice.

Yes, it basically boils down to " murder LOTS of people (from group X) " .

That is complete bullshit. If there was is one man in all of Europe who has taken up the banner of political correctness, it is Breivik.

I wonder what percentage of this country will be of mixed parentage by the time " white people become a minority " .

Haven't you been calling it genocide to allow it?

Apathy that has been bred by history. Plenty of people argued when piracy was a hot topic that if the West wanted to do something about piracy they should do something about Somalia, and yet they were ignored then. Why should anyone expect that something will come of talk this time?

Now you just have to account for about forty five other countries. Does it really though? I use a recent tragedy to point out that the ideology you preach is one of hatred for people based on what they were born as. Hatred killed those people, and if you think it is in bad taste to point out that perhaps you should think again about hate, then the one it reflects poorly on is you. All I pointed out was that you have a choice.

Kind of ironic too that a guy who has such a beef with Jews apparently thinks that "White" people will die out in better conditions than Jews had in Europe. It is almost as if he thinks Jews are superior to "White" folks.

Yes, if you count anyone who is not 100% White as Black, I can see how one might confuse Jamaica as being 91% Black. Yet you entirely discount that it is the Malays who are the indigenous group in Singapore, with only small share of the population. Unlike you, however, I am sure the native Malays do not spend all their time crying to their mommys because they share a country with people who are Chinese. And Malays, by the way, are Austronesian, not East Asian.

Who besides you has said that it is wrong for Africa to accept immigrants from non-African countries? You are, in fact, the only one here advocating this idiotic position. Do you really want to be in the same camp as a guy who murdered over eighty kids, mostly "white" kids, a mere couple of days ago.

How many times am I going to have to say this is one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard before you get the picture?

Yes, I know plenty about the history of White People Who Hate Other White People. And since everyone has seemingly forgotten about that, I am confident that we shall also forget about the history of White People Who Hate Not-White People one day. You, however, seem to have learned nothing from the cessation of hatred between White Folks.

You are operating under a false assumption that Canada and the United States can be grouped with Europe. And you forgot South Africa for South Africans, Jamaica for Jamaicans, Singapore for Singaporans, and a host of other countries that do not fit your idiotic world view.

And when was Canada 98% "White People"? In 1867? Back when most of what is now Canada, and what had a much higher percentage of Aboriginals, was not counted? There has never been a time when the land we now call Canada had a sum total of 98% White Folks. Not that you will let a little critical thinking get in your way, I imagine. Because, you know, the percentage of "White People" in Canada is meaningless when half of those folks dislike the other half for reasons that have nothing to do with skin colour.

If you are under some impression that I am bound to hero worship of Winston Churchill and have been stunned, you are laughably mistaken.

Yes, that must be why Fascist regimes have executed so many people who disagreed with them: because they were secretly Communists!

Yes, it is such a terrible smear of the good names of Herman Goring, Joseph Goebbels, Josef Mengele, Heinrich Himmler, and, of course, Adolf Hitler.

Here it the article: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/top-court-hands-first-nations-tax-break-on-investments/article2106850/ I am not really so keen on discussing the ins and outs of First Nations taxation. Rather, I am curious whether this could possibly be turned into a loophole in the tax code for corporations that are not First Nations. Such as, a corporation creates an agreement to sell all of their assets to a First Nations group for nothing, runs the company in the First Nations name, and then when the time comes the group sells it back for a commission, so that while taxes may be paid on the front and back ends, they would not be paid in the middle.

You might want to look up Reality under The Real World.

That Michael Hardner had no problem understanding my meaning speaks volumes about your level of comprehension.

You have yet to demonstrate the obligation to pay interest on anything.

If you could read you would already know what policy I was referring to and could have skipped right to the accusation.

If you go with the current prisoner population in Canada, and divide that into the cost of building new prisons ($9 billion or something?), you get over $650,000 per existing prisoner to build new prisons. $650,000+. Per prisoner.

You might want to grow some common sense and figure out that strict proportionality is not a requirement of anything. The American Revolution was fought for far less than what you imply. And yet you do not even understand what you imply. The Order in Council you refer to is from 1861, yet in your nonsense calculations you act as if it applies since 1830.