kraychik

Your juvenile behaviour says everything about you and nothing about me.

It's revealing that you put religion and race in the same category. As far as "understanding a lot more", it reminds me of another Reagan phrase about leftists, "they know so much that isn't so".

"Fat guy" and "ProTip" is exactly what I'm talking about. You don't even realise that you expose yourself as a manchild. Have you got some pizza boxes stacked up on the kitchen table with empty pepsi bottles lying under your bed? Do you also celebrate your "decision" not to have kids by deluding yourself into thinking this was a choice you made for yourself rather than the other way around?

Do you ever take a moment to consider that you behave like a teenager? Put aside the eternal bachelor playing video games and enamoured with his own ineptitude towards being a family man, you regularly reply with playground-calibre dialogue. "Cool story bro", and virgin jokes just expose you as the perpetual infant.

I suppose you think Statistics Canada is actually maintaining such data?

It won't die out as long as there are more people like me and less people like you. I don't assume any sort of inevitability of Western civilisation "winning out". It sort of reminds me of the idiotic leftist Francis Fukuyama essay of "The End of History". There is a constant struggle between freedom and tyranny, and as the Reagan quote goes, "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction." Leftists like yourself envision some sort of inevitability of your grand design, and some of us actually know where that arrogant narrative comes from.

You're the one who initially asked for the information. Why is an exact number or percentage relevant? It isn't relevant at all. Some of us recognise the problem, some of us demand undeliverable proof from Ipsos-Reid.

See what I mean? This is pointless. Not a shred of honesty, and not a shred of competence. Michael Hardner does serve a purpose, though, he puts on full display the mentality of the left and the depths to which they will delude themselves.

So now you're asserting that wanting to murder someone who isn't driving defensively is "instinctual". Even better, a man wanting to rape a woman in an elevator is also "instinctual". Somehow you place the above "natural" desires in the same category as the desire for consensual romance with one's girlfriend or boyfriend.

Right, you don't recognise personal responsibility and seek to absolve people from accountability for their actions. I get that. I think I'm gonna use that quote in my signature. It's great.

He was brought before a military commission, and there was a jury. The jury recommended that Khadr receive a forty year sentence. Two seconds with Google searching for keywords like "jury", and "Omar Khadr" might help you.

Of course the discussion will remain in the tiny box. We've got, on the one hand, Michael Hardner who wants to shut the thread down because it makes him uncomfortable. On the other hand, we've got Black Dog who thinks a Quran verse is off topic in a conversation about dealing with Islamism and a bunch of Muslims demanding that freedom of speech and expression be destroyed not only in Canada but worldwide. Bring up an inconvenient truth, and it's "off-topic".

The entire Muslim takeover of the Middle East and Northern Africa, as an example? You think the region was 95% Muslim with everyone speaking Arabic since the beginning or time, I suppose?

Again, nobody is forcing you to be here. Twenty-eight pages of this thread in only a few days suggests that many people around here disagree with you. If you don't like it, you're welcome to click the red 'X' in the top right corner of your browser window.

In other words, when relevant information is brought up that you don't understand or are unfamiliar with, then it is "off-topic", am I right?

In other words, you can't connect the dots. There's plenty of context in this thread alone, and the verse doesn't need much explanation as it's pretty straightforward. Obviously you haven't done any "homework" on either Nazism or Islamism, otherwise you wouldn't be so stupefied about DogOnPorch's drawing of the clear parallels between these two ideologies. There are many core components that unify both Islamism and Nazism, and it'd be a waste of time for us to explain it to you because you lack both the honesty and competence to deal with the material.

We're not talking about those people though, are we? So why are you bringing them up? Let me guess, in order to deflect the conversation towards something completely irrelevant. I suppose this is what you call "staying on topic"?

That's exactly what you said. You're now trying to parse words. Despite all the terrorism going on around the world from Islamists, you still refuse to acknowledge the problem and the common denominator while it's smashing you in the face. Nobody ever said Muslims are monolithic. More strawman argument desperation from our resident 40-something video gaming eternal bachelor.

Many people have gone to great lengths in this thread to spoonfeed you information. We cannot force you connect the dots. If you don't realise by now that there is a dangerous current of Islamism that runs through many Muslim societies, and that we are importing many of these people into our country via irresponsible immigration policies, then there's really no hope that you're ever gonna see the light. It seems to me that you've dug your heels deep into this indefensible position, and that you decided long ago to bury your head in the sand so as not to offend your leftist sensibilities. As far as the relevance of the Quran quote DogOnPorch linked us to, perhaps this will resonate with some:

They don't have to do anything. They certainly don't have to mix or work. Moreover, Canada's "multiculturalism" policy specifically seeks to prevent acculturation from occurring.

Wow, a Wikipedia link. Very compelling, you're quite a researcher! You'd make a great bureaucrat if you aren't already on the public dole. Oh, so now MLW is instituting rules against using "emotional" language? Perhaps you should get together with the other administrators of the website and release a dictionary outlining which words are permissible so that I don't make the mistake of using terms like "sick" and "disgusting" again when describing sick and disgusting ideological persuasions. Yeah, it's sure hard to compete with your "factual" link to a Wikipedia article about immigration.

Again, you're putting on full display an obvious fallacy that is evident even to those in primary school. You're assuming all groups are alike. It's so absurd on its face that it doesn't warrant any serious discussion.

Do you or do you not realise that radicalism/fundamentalism is a problem within Islamic culture to a significantly greater and more dangerous degree than with virtually all other cultures? Put another way, do you expect CSIS to have as many churches and synagogues under surveillance for incitement towards and material support towards terrorismas mosques?

We already know your and Michael Hardner's prescription: keep on importing diseased and uneducated third-world trash, Islamists, communists, and Nazis until "scientific evidence" is presented from "experts" and "authorities" to tell us that this is a bad idea. It's not possible to have a reasonable or honest discussion with either of you leftists. Remember, reality doesn't exist until the CBC tells you it does.

That's not proof. Canada enjoys broader success despite its failures. Your position could be used to suggest that the EHealth scandal was actually a success because healthcare in Ontario is still of good quality and reasonably accessible to most Ontarians. It is a ridiculous position. All of this is based on your initial ridiculous premise. It's like saying that gambling away $500 every weekend isn't a waste of money because my net worth is higher this year than in years past due to a strong income. By this standard, Harper's administration has been a success. Of course, you'll vote for one of the opposition in the next federal election.