kraychik

The administration of this website is transparently leftist, as is the majority of its participants. When in Rome...

Your conjecture about "abuse" or health complications being the primary (or exclusive) reasons for late-term abortions is worthless. As is your false assertion that a woman cannot secure a late-term abortion in Canada for any reason.

My mistake, it opens without a password. I just needed to press 'enter' when prompted for it. Assuming the statistics are correct, they're irrelevant for reasons I already explained. Moreover, the link itself acknowledges that it only collected information from hospitals and clinics that collected this specific information. I do, however, believe it is fair to assume that these statistics are consistent across the entire abortion panorama.

There is a password required to open that link. You're still not addressing the core of the issue, why does the proportion of pregnancy terminations being carried out in the later stages of pregnancy relevant? If is is wrong to do so, it is wrong to do so once or a million times. Imagine removing criminalisation of murder simply because it's a rare crime. It's an absurd line of logic.

I do not believe him. I think this departure is a product of political "insider trading", if you catch my drift. He knows something more about the massive damage to Ontario that he's overseen than the rest of us already know.

How does any of this change the fact that the "Palestinian" national identity is largely a product of the Six Day War? Arab nationalism certainly predates the Six Day War, as do internal struggles for control, I'm not disputing that. The narrative of a distinct nation known as the "Palestinians", however, is entirely a recent political manufacture.

More specifically, it's a problem with communists and other leftists on this website who have contempt for freedom of speech and expression. I did a brief search of banned users on this board and was completely unsurprised to discover that the overwhelming majority of them held opinions that came from the right side of the political divide.

You're right, reasonable people will not disagree with me. Leftists, however, will vigorously oppose any such efforts. This was demonstrated in the the older thread where leftists like you, wyly, guyser, and BlackDog were attacking the very existence of a problem long before potential solutions were ever brought forward. In other words, how do you even begin to address a problem if you don't even know about it? It comes back down to the question: if a tree falls in the woods and Michael Hardner isn't around to hear it, does it make a sound?

What are you reporting, exactly? I am accurately describing you as a communist who has contempt for freedom of speech and expression.

You're right, Fox News has completely buried this story. Conservative news outlets, however, are covering the story. It's mentioned by Breitbart, The Daily Caller, The Blaze, and Town Hall (to name a few). The conservative media landscape is following this story, which was broken by The Huffington Post. Kudos to the Huffington Post for this story. EDIT - CNN has also ignored this story.

Although you probably already know this, his stated reason for leaving was to spend more time with his family. He said he reflected on his priorities in life after attending his daughter's wedding.

BubberMiley is partially right about one thing: McGuinty will never secure the leadership of the LPC, but he may be demented enough to run for it. As far as the subject matter of the thread goes, McGuinty is just another leftist politician with a legacy of financial ruin who will never be seriously held accountable. Ontario is sort of like the Canadian California.

So now statism is another term we can add to the growing list of terms you don't understand.

Since when? "Palestinianism" was almost exclusively a product of the Six Day War. Prior to that, they were just Arabs (tribal). They magically morphed into a new nationalism, which has been very effective as a tool of propaganda.

Incorporating the Arabs of the so-called West Bank would've been suicide for Israel. They should have been forced to Jordan; a form of repatriation to the state created for them from the former British Mandate for Palestine.

DogOnPorch must be pretty desperate for conversation, he's going back and forth with an anti-Semite and another guy who isn't sure if the Muslim Brotherhood is Islamist.

The real test for socialists like Moonlight Graham will be whether or not he supports reforms to address this problem. Being a socialist and having little respect for individual freedom, I imagine he would be comfortable with oppressive measures marketed as solutions.

Islamism IS the new Nazism. The number of parallels shared between the Nazis and Islamists is frightening. More frightening, however, is how the left is doing everything it can to obstruct efforts to protect our societies from this clear and present danger. We can all see it in this thread. From strawman arguments like "everyone has the right to peacefully protest", as if ANYONE has asserted otherwise, and attempts to pretend that this is a "tiny minority" that isn't worth paying attention to. If we do not defeat this leftist narrative, we will destroy ourselves.

Agreeing with reality is a starting point, but if we begin to discuss policies to address these problems, I am confident that you would oppose the most basic solutions. As far as the media is concerned, these stories are often buried, and there is no serious dialogue whatsoever going on in leftist Canadian media (CBC, National Post, Toronto Star, etc) regarding a review of "multiculturalism" policies. It is a sacred cow that is not to be questioned. The article I linked is from a right-leaning British newspaper. The BBC barely covered it (it was not a primary headline on the main page on the 14th when the event occurred), and the Guardian didn't cover it at all. There is a widespread consensus among leftist media outlets to play down these stories. Why limit Muslims? Why not just keep out Islamists and other undesirables by asking simple screening questions for those wish to come to Canada? It's much simpler, and much more effective. As far as limits go - we don't need limits on Muslims, we need limits on Islamists. One Khadr family is one too many. Canada will continue its slow suicide through leftist immigration policies unless it changes course, it's inevitable. Thankfully, some baby steps have been taken by Jason Kenney. I have stated many times that labels have limitations and cannot encompass the complexity of all individuals, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a lot of utility in using them where appropriate.

Are you suggesting that someone in this thread opposes the right to freedom of speech, expression, and association? You asserting this point implies that certain people in here have taken an opposing position. All you need is a sufficient number of people to accept the perspective that freedom of speech and expression can justifiably be further restricted than it already is. For example, we have communists like jacee that have openly stated that they support destruction of private property and assault in the name of "free speech". Intimidation from Islamists provides further justification to the left and their weak lemming followers for their never-ending desire to destroy fundamental rights.

Women often demonstrate as well, they just do it separately. That's another rejection of what ordinary people would consider a basic value of modern civilisation: regular interactions between the sexes and not a rigid separation in all walks of life. Again, we're importing people by the millions who fundamentally reject core values upon which our societies are built. The left is opening the gates for the barbarians, and stupefied of the problems resulting from that decision.

The thing is that this is a broad pattern of behaviour that we're seeing all across the Western world, and the story is buried by most of the media because it doesn't fit in with their leftist narrative. We've seen these shows of intimidation in Toronto, New York, Ottawa, London, Moscow, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Oslo, Sydney, Stockholm, and so forth. Moreover, several of these demonstrations involved serious violence. That's to say nothing of the terrorism we've also seen around the Western world from the usual suspects. Of course, certain folks refuse to acknowledge the nature of this problem and prefer to hurl slanderous accusations of racism and "Islamophobia" towards those that bring forward facts that disrupt the narrative of cultural relativity an "multiculturalism".

Dre is either incapable of unwilling to acknowledge that there is a political struggle going on between those that support freedom of speech and expressions and those that wish to destroy it, so I'm not gonna waste with him. You should remember, however, and I'm sure you do, that we have seen intimidation of not only private interests (The Comedy Network, virtually all of the Canadian and American new outlets, etc), but also from our politicians. Consider Obama's request that Google remove the "Innocence of Muslims" video, or how he had Dempsey call Terry Jones to ask him not to burn the Quran. Even perusing this forum we can find a number of people, all of whom are leftists, who are sympathetic to the destruction of freedom of speech and wish to criminalise that which they describe as "hate speech" or ridiculously label as "incitement". The point? This eternal struggle to preserve the most essential freedoms of society is not served well by importing millions of people who hate this most basic value. Expect the so-called Human Rights Act of 1977 to be further abused via the Orwellian-named "Human Rights Tribunals".

Thousands of Muslims protest outside of Google's headquarters in London, demanding that it censor content they deem offensive or defamatory of their faith/culture. This is a forecast of what we can expect in Canada if immigration policies aren't revisited. We already saw a preview of this in Toronto recently with hundreds of Muslims demanding that America destroy its first amendment. As per usual, this story will be ignored by most of the leftist media. http://www.telegraph...-Google-HQ.html

Yeah, I came across that story. It's typical of the left: hate-filled, angry, racist, and misogynistic.