JMH

After Muslems completely "sacked" a northern town in Nigeria in the name of Allah (killing 22 and burnining churches)...........The Christians came back and burned 4 mosks and killed only 18. This brings the medal count into question. With 4 mosks, and the resultant dead, Christianity is looking weak in the semi-finals. The Muslems were seen preparing for "the bout" with younger "fresh" idiots to counter the Christ loving bunch. The Christians remain steadfast in their resolve none the less. JMH FOX NEWS SPORTS

After Muslems completely "sacked" a northern town in Nigeria in the name of Allah (killing 22 and burnining churches)...........The Christians came back and burned 4 mosks and killed only 18. This brings the medal count into question. With 4 mosks, and the resultant dead, Christianity is looking weak in the semi-finals. The Muslems were seen preparing for "the bout" with younger "fresh" idiots to counter the Christ loving bunch. The Christians remain steadfast in their resolve none the less. JMH FOX NEWS SPORTS

There is no point to arguing the virtues of the various "teams" throughout humanity. The Chistians are continuing the full court press against the defiant Muslims, in what has been one hell of a game. The Muslims are charging back with suprising defence in the corners. Sickening violence on both sides has kept the viewing public on its feet. Wether its cartoons or be-headings, these "Faiths of Peace" are really kicking the hell out of one another. Interviewed today, the team captain of the "Jews" said that givin their semi-final game (against everbody), they'd rather face the Muslims in the final......as they've played them many times before and understand their tactics. There you are sports fans !...................The Religious Olympics. JMH , FOX SPORTS Thank GOD for religion. It STILL allows people to commit crimes without punishment. How it survives. May Jesus, Allah and Moses roll in their graves.......and if they do? WE'VE GOT IT ON FOX SPORTS !

It really is unusual isn't it? Recent Canadians seem to believe that Canada is a perfect venue for their voices to be heard........concerning the country they have left. It has now become obvious to me that these individuals are using our generous system for they're own bennefit with little to no consolation for the progressivness of Canadian families that allowed this process to occur. I'll be frank: I do not want a foriegn culture moving into my neighborhood unless they are true Canadians in spirit. The sharing of international cultures is fundamental to our maintaining the country as we know it. Peolples "clustering" and having little contact with nieghbors and societies other than themselves is undesireable. The Seik population is a perfect example (I live and work in B.C.). This group of new Canadians have by and large , remained amongst themselves since the initial onslaught of immigragration. They are uninterested in Canadian morality and have disrespected our Legions, Police forces and other Canadian institutions that we hold as sacred. To this day, if a white man married the daughter of one of these jack-asses......they'd be on borrowed time .........the daughter oddly enough. I then ,would be obliged to kill the father and brothers and perhaps the family, in order to move on. These IMBISULE TITS are preparing an honest and legally binding request for sharia law in this country! Can you FUCKING BELIEVE THESE COCKSUCKERS? We let them in. We let them in. We let them in. CANADIAN IMMIGRATION RECUITMENT: -Looking for wealthy (enough) morally depraved assholes with no intention WHATSOEVER to complly with Canadian law, our way of living, and fully maintain the arrogence that your culture maintains while tying up our court system about every irrelevent issue that comes to mind. Yes , the JEWS of the Arab world. I hope your proud.........all of you. ANGRY? Common! there must be someone in SURRY to shoot or run over. Get a hold of what your doing. Of all countries-Canada- the most understanding and helpfull people around. The most willing and acceptable people on this earth............and you continue to PISS on us . I susspect the party's over .............in my lifetime. You have become un-welcome already. It's that simple.

Here Here! Muslems continue to be absurd with their antics.......and for what? -they aren't accepted in European society? Go figure. -they can't handle cartoons? They seem to like them if it involves a Jew or Yankee getting be-headed. A real "knee slapper" in the muslim world. -they blame the WEST for all thier troubles? Until 911, "the west" had very little pressence in the region. its interests always concerned the states of Israel and Palestine..........and fiscal/trade matters........oil..buisness. They should take their issues up with the "clerics" in the Mercedes Benz. -self sacrifice is a beutiful thing? Well, mental-retardation occurs in every culture I guess. -They belive they are playing the winning game! Despite the fact that the people of the west are becoming intollerant, let alone disgusted with the foolishness. I'll tell ya, if it continues.........I can see massive and decisive WAR in the near future (Geneva Convention need not apply). If Muslems want it.........there going to get it. I don't think they understand what will happen. I guess ALLAH will take care of them as a people.....in the next life.

Day after day the media spews out more violent protests in the name of Islam. If it isn't cartoons , its unemployment in France or blah blah blah. These people are behaving like silly children. Nobody is keeping these radicals from leaving Europe. If they dont like it , get the hell out; as a matter of fact, I'm disgusted that the EU hasn't began rounding these idiots up and giving them "the boot" already. In my oppinion, France should have declared Martial Law months ago , and mowed down any jack-ass that engaged in civil disobedience. Enough is enough.

Read my reply to speaker. The severity of sentences has little to no effect on the possibility of a crime being committed. What does have a impact is the swiftness and certainty of capture and punishment. If the chances of being caught are near 100% then the crime rate will fall to near zero. Why use up precious resources by locking up criminals for overly long periods of time (more time in prison so they learn from other inmates how to be better criminals) when you could be using the same resources to prevent crime from happening in the first place. Attack the root of the problem, not the symptoms. To begin, my post suggests that a crime wouldn't occur in the first place in many cases today if it weren't for the YOA. Your "capture and punishment" theory does nothing to prevent the crime and also contradicts the second portion of your post, which is a lack of resources in the prison system. So I'm lost on that one too. There is NO lack of resources available in Canada concerning the penal system. There is only a lack of desire (by the political folks) to make the changes for this to happen. What you are essentially saying is that criminals should be permitted lieniency based upon the percieved lack of prison space and the costs associated within that framework. I don't agree whatsoever. Violent criminals belong in prison. Thats why we have them, and the government has been derelict in its resposability to build more. Our population grows, and crime grows with it. Public safety is paramount, period. Whether a violent perp is a young offender or an adult, they belong in a prison enviroment or (in too many cases today), deported immediatly with no questions asked. I agree with you entirely that more resources should be put forth to prevent crime . We have the money for that too. The abolishment of the YOA would be a great start.

Read my reply to speaker. The severity of sentences has little to no effect on the possibility of a crime being committed. What does have a impact is the swiftness and certainty of capture and punishment. If the chances of being caught are near 100% then the crime rate will fall to near zero. Why use up precious resources by locking up criminals for overly long periods of time (more time in prison so they learn from other inmates how to be better criminals) when you could be using the same resources to prevent crime from happening in the first place. Attack the root of the problem, not the symptoms. To begin, my post suggests that a crime wouldn't occur in the first place in many cases today if it weren't for the YOA. Your "capture and punishment" theory does nothing to prevent the crime and also contradicts the second portion of your post, which is a lack of resources in the prison system. So I'm lost on that one too. There is NO lack of resources available in Canada concerning the penal system. There is only a lack of desire (by the political folks) to make the changes for this to happen. What you are essentially saying is that criminals should be permitted lieniency based upon the percieved lack of prison space and the costs associated within that framework. I don't agree whatsoever. Violent criminals belong in prison. Thats why we have them, and the government has been derelict in its resposability to build more. Our population grows, and crime grows with it. Public safety is paramount, period. Whether a violent perp is a young offender or an adult, they belong in a prison enviroment or (in too many cases today), deported immediatly with no questions asked. I agree with you entirely that more resources should be put forth to prevent crime . We have the money for that too. The abolishment of the YOA would be a great start.

I agree. Furthermore, I believe the worst thing that happened to the youth of Canada, was the "Young Offenders Act". Young people these days are well aware that crime "DOES PAY", when it comes to them. I can only speak for myself but I've mused (jokingly) about robbing a bank. Why havn't I? Because it's morally deprived but also because the prospect of spending 15-25 in Stoney Mountain Penn. is not my idea of fun. Consequences are a deterent and anyone that says otherwise is kidding themselves. The basis for the YOA was flawed to begin with: "young people are fundimentaly good people and should not pay heavily for mistakes". Well, my way thinking reads: fundementaly good, youg people won't commit crimes when they know that they will be punished severly!

Comparing Trudeu and Harper in any way is similar to.........well ..........nothing. Charisma is not Mr. Harpers strong suit. Policy may be. I hope like your self.

Jeepers, even I didn't think the Liberal party could amass such an embarrasing group of people. Only the arrogent terds are left........and a hoplessly dumb blonde girl that entered politics when I had my last "physical". The rich........my god they get more nerve every time I turn around. Silliness. Sorry, I forgot Brison.........probably the most qualified and perhaps the most honerable..........but never to be..........common Mr. Brison, Your Gay...........it ain't gonna happen.

I understand your thoughts and agree somewhat. That being said, Harpers government is a very Lean minority. Personaly, I've met few people that were "wanting things to happen" as opposed to "not wanting silly things to happen". Mr. Harper could find himself in another election in 6-18 months if he gets wonkey. The economy is excellent, all is well and very little needs to be done in the immediate sense to my thinking.

I am sure the Pentagon is drawing up invasion plans as we speak... Yes but the U.N. will save us! Did I just say that? Honestly, I think we can hold them off and reape the beneffits for some time.

It's certainly compelling as it was intended to be so. My only problem with such an add is that it's a movie..........propaganda for a specific cause (however well meaning). Land mines in the grand scheme of things, are not the BIG problem of this world nor are they a mensionable problem in this world when compared to the other issues that people like you and myself wish to change.

I was not only shocked that 60 minutes profiled this small peice of Canada, I have to say that I smiled a great deal throughout the program. The statistical information that the American program had compiled, showed that Canada has proven reserves greater than that of Saudi Arabia (from their beginings......until their end). With fossil fuels being a modern reality (while realistic alternative research continues), Canada.......... yes......Canada has quite a windfall on its hands. My opinion: Canada has 30-40 years to exploit this resource before it becomes worthless. Our nation could become very wealthy and regain an influential position in the world. We could then make a difference in the third world.......on our terms.........Canadian terms. I'm curious as to any thoughts. Remember, if we dont get it now, someone else will..........guess who?

I feel that it would be unwise for Mr. Harper to do so. The majority of Canadians desire the status quo..........with the inclusion of honesty and fiscal results. This course, would allow more Canadians to trust his leadership and prop-up his "centrist" following (most of us). If this occurs, the small "ultra" right wing cling-ons will disappear, and the moderates will prevail. Given the latest information concerning the Liberal leadership race, I see no other path for Mr. Harper to follow. Mr. Mckenna's(sp) disinterest in a run for Prime Minister leaves the Liberal Party very, very weak to say the least; Volpe , Brison, Stronach........you've got to be kidding me. Personally, my greatest worry is that PM Harper will hang himself with an overtly "Pro American" stance. Canada is in a very unique position right now (oil and gas), and short term victories with softwood and so on would be counterproductive. We have more OIL than the Saudis ever had, and we have 30-40 years to leverage that resource for gains before it becomes worthless. It's now... Canadas time. If matters are handled properly, we could become one of the weathiest nations on earth.............wealth means influence..............and finally as a nation, we could share our values, CANADIAN VALUES with any country in need......If they wished! No bombs, No B.S.. The Canadian Way. The right way. Think of the possibilities! :

If that wasn't the most disrespectful, intolerant and ignorant comment I've heard this year I don't know what is. You've just lost any crediability in my opinion with such a blatent display of bigotry, and you've only been here 3 days. Well, I guess thats why theres so many jokes about lawyers out there! When it comes to intolerance and disrespect, I'm not sure if you were talking about our Canadian charter or the backlog of legal cases concerning the Catholic church and its leadership? No, I was definitely talking about that personal attack on a member of this forum that only a few posts earlier said he was Catholic. I happen to be Catholic and don't appreciate such an attack. There just no place for personal attacks here. If thats not a personal attack I don't know what is. Unless you are a Catholic priest under investigation, I'm not sure how you would define a humourous slant upon an issue as a PERSONAL ATTACK! This is not a Catholic memo board. This is a political arena for Canadians (70% of wich are not Catholic). That being said, many of you hve brought religion into the foray. When doing so, you had best be ready to defend your selves. It's quite obvious to me that any non-catholic thought or coment is unacceptable. :angry:

Does it matter? Either you accept that as Canadians we believe all citizens are equal under the Charter or you don't. It doesn't matter how many there are or whether we like them or even whether we approve. A quick example for you. In the 1800's it was common practice for both british and french immigrants in canada to marry First Nations women. After awhile, both the Anglican and Catholic churches decided they didn't like this so they nullified all marriages saying that since the women were not baptized Christains early enough (they had to make it that way because most of them had converted to Christianity before or at the time of their marriage) the marriages were not valid. Many women were abandoned by their spouses. So, would you accept this restriction to the Charter? Can a religion say, sorry we don't like you savages so we'll nullify your sacrements, the ones we performed? There is an old saying "First they came for the gypsies but I wasn't a gypsey so I didn't care. Then they came for the Jews but I wasn't a Jew so I didn't care. Then they came for the homosexuals but I wasn't a homosexual so I didn't care. Then they came for me but there was nobody left to care." Gay marriage has nothing to with the charter -as it has already been decided upon.............the charter allows civil unions by default. Gay marriage, on the other hand can not be passed; Its ironic but true that the charter would have to be violated (freedom of faith) in order to allow same sex marriage to occur. Even more ironic is the fact that the only way out of this (legally) is the use of the "not with standing clause". What a load of cr*p Cite some sources for this stroke of genius please. Pierre Elliot Trudeu.

which conservative ass did you pull that argument out of?? I'm not aware of the "gay marriage clause" within the charter of rights and fredoms. Enlighten me.

So if happen to not have a religion, does that mean I can't get married? Not in a church..........correct. Unless they allow it........which creates another argument altogether. Non-political issue.

If that wasn't the most disrespectful, intolerant and ignorant comment I've heard this year I don't know what is. You've just lost any crediability in my opinion with such a blatent display of bigotry, and you've only been here 3 days. Well, I guess thats why theres so many jokes about lawyers out there! When it comes to intolerance and disrespect, I'm not sure if you were talking about our Canadian charter or the backlog of legal cases concerning the Catholic church and its leadership?

I love CBC aswell. I was refering to (local) Eastern journalists I watched (on sattelite) as the numbers came in

Communists Dammit!

You're playing with words. Nothing needs to be decided. Gays can marry under the Charter, religions are not obligated to perform the ceremony and may not be forced to. Civil marriages are the legal marriage in Canada so gays can marry, religions may or may not decide to perform ceremonies, everybody's happy, nobody's rights are violated. If gays want to be married in the Catholic church they can take that up with the proper authorities in Vatican City. I'm afraid you brought up the charter (words). However , if what you say is true? .........why is it STILL an issue? I personally don't care who marries who. What I DO care about is bullshit that keeps going on and on and on. This is not a political issue at all..................ANYMORE. Go talk to father O'flarity with your ideas ( but dont leave him alone with the children).

Yes what has?