Jump to content

PolyNewbie

Member
  • Posts

    2,484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PolyNewbie

  1. Then post something real here yourself if you don't like it. Don't complain about others. Thats probably because you haven't said anything. Grow up. Stop acting like a lawyer. I have shown: (1) How the official report doesn't say what people think it says (2) How the official investigators have demonstrated conflicts of interest (3) How the "debunker sites are full of only lies (4) How it was impoissible for the buildings to collapse the way they did without an additional source of energy and that this source of energy must be bombs (5) Congressional testimony of intentional stand down order (6) illegal cover up of evidence (7) motive: to start wars and allow political supporters to make piles of money, implement the police state to begin transition to North American Union. Excuse for imperial aggression. (8) Faked evidence - Osama Bin Laden Confession tapes. (9) Dozens of high level qualified experts that do not have demonstrable conflicts of interest saying it was an inside job. (10) Foreknowledge of wtc7 collapse (11) Witnesses: Firefighters, etc. Explosions before collapse caught on video.
  2. I'm not here to argue for Jones. His analysis is not yet proof so its not fact. I don't care if Jones is right or wrong - there are competing theories. I will only discuss fact I have explained that I will not engage in speculation because it doesn't win arguements.
  3. Military Commissions act. Patriot Act. They could have got him to confess to being in love with his own cat after putting the pliars to his balls. The confession means nothing. From that story: "The hearing, which began Friday and is ongoing, is being conducted in secret, with no reporters allowed to attend. " Do you really believe the results of a secret trial conducted in private by the US military in Guantanomo bay where they use torture to obtain confessions ?
  4. But kimmy, you didn't prove anything. You just keep posting your own analysis as proof. I found the tape and linked it above. Do you think that was faked by one of us truthies and that the real confession tape has someone that looks more like Bin Laden ? How do you explain that this seminal piece of evidence that supports why we invaded Afghanistan isn't posted on the BBC, CNN, etc sites ? Do you think they lost iot like BBC lost all their footage on the day of 911 or the way the Pentagon lost 3.3 trillion dollars (enough to buy and equip 500 Nimitz class carriers) ? Do you think this is all just a coincidence ? Lets see it. Link ? Bin Laden said he didn't do it as reported by CNN shortly after 911 and before this fake confession tape surfaced.
  5. It shows the actual confession tapes of Bin Laden. You won't find those archived by CNN or BBC and the reason is obvious. That aint Bin Laden.
  6. The faked Osama Tape Video "Wake up gentle reader, the whole world is laughing at you" - Paul Craig Roberts
  7. No. My arguement has been fact after fact after fact - indesputable facts that make my case that you cannot discredit. You just keep distorting things and using insults and you make stuff up like the above post. Of all the posters I have argued with you are by far the most lowly pathetic excuse for a human being that I have ever met on these forums. The others should take a look at you and see the company they keep.
  8. You are the only one peddling that around.
  9. Over 104 posts and still not a single shred of evidence to show Bin Laden attacked us on 911. Your experts have been discredited - all having conflicts of interest . The official version has been discredited. Lets see some real arguement !
  10. I have - just not the corporate media mainstream publishing house UNESCO version. There is another version that doesn't force you to make rediculous assumptions like we attack countries for democracy and freedom and Bin Laden attacked us because he hates our freedom. Its stupid to believe that.
  11. Can you geniuses come up with one single reason piece of evidence why we should thijnk Bin Laden did 911 ? Means ? Motive ? Opportunity ?
  12. Thats pretty low to make something like that up. But its expected.
  13. I think if they were paying you they would have fired you a long time ago.
  14. Can you geniuses come up with one single reason why we should thijnk Bin Laden did 911 ? You can't win the arguement so you use insults and innuendos. If 911 was an inside job you should be as afraid as I am.
  15. Proof !!! YOUR OPINION DOESN"T CONSTITUTE PROOF. I saw that video when broadcasted I know it wasn't Bin Laden. Show us the real video then if you say that one has been doctored. You are definetly a contender for the Golden Hockey Puck award but show us the beef !
  16. If 911 was an inside job then it proves you are the one that needs help. We are winning.
  17. Ron Paul will have an hour long speech on Alex Jones tomorrow. He lays it all out about the trotskyites, everything else. He has formerly announced his canidacy.
  18. You are not my favorite poster.
  19. I have to admit that kimmy gives better arguement than Canadian Blue or Riverwind. I was getting sick of those guys plugging up the post with nonsense. At least kimmy isn't making logical errors. You made that up. I didn't say that. Clean up your act or your chances to win the puck will decrease.
  20. Great show, great experts. Watched it Saturday. Everyone has to see this before they use global warming to create another system of control.
  21. I think its easy and fun too. I can just see him pounding away on his keyboard desperately trying to cover this up. I think he should win the golden hockey puck award for this effort. American/Bosnian Sex Trade Explain this one.
  22. I don't use junk journalism at all. I use fact only. Its fact that lobbyists on Capital Hill are lobbying to prevent the USA from prosecuting its citizens for participating in the child sex trade overseas. Explain it away, justify it, make excuses for it all you want but its still fact. I don't agree with your interpretation of the facts and I am not likely to agree with corporate controlled mainstream media interpretation of facts. The facts speak for themselves. No, he is a physicist because he has published in physics journals. In that sense he is a "published physicist".
  23. Nope. I saw this on CNN when it first aired. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry but it was immediately obvious dude wasn't Bin Laden. Show us !! Lets see the real video !!!! How do you know this - show us the proof. You constantly posting your own thoughts as proof is the only steaming pile of schit I know of. This link's for you and even more for Canadian Blue !!!
  24. I see. OK. Then stop. Go post elsewhere. Still can't come up with a single reason why we should believe Osama Bin Laden attacked us on 911 huh ? I think I have been able to show how they are obviously wrong and done so with dimple science then concluded that they would have to be paid off to say something so purposefully & obviously wrong.
  25. Bin Laden Confession ROTFLMAO
×
×
  • Create New...