Leafless

Your bias is showing. Is that the way natives think?

I married a blonde. I like the combination of pale white skin, sexy blonde hair and the fact they always look cool, even when there hot.

My solution is relating to a perpetrator that is discovered and apprehended and not relating to a phantom threat written on the bathroom wall of a washroom. But if my solution was incorporated with known harsh penalties, more than likely that threat would never have been written on the bathroom wall, if one is to value their existence on this planet.

Well, then you are not looking for a solution when you are content with the fact you would accept the word of a perpetrator who says the threat he or she made was only a prank. How can you be so sure it could be a prank when obviously anyone caught red handed making a serious threat relating to mass killings, would more than likely say the same thing to try to avoid any type of prosecution. So that is my solution, treat the threat as seriously as if it did occur as this is the only preventive action society can take against preplanned terrorism of this type and should serve as an excellent deterrent.

Now your not making sense. How do you know for certain that a threat of this kind is a hollow threat. Maybe no one was killed because of the publicity around the threat, but could be carried out at a later time. Who knows for certain. The point is, a threat of this nature is extremely serious, and if the perpetrator of this threat is found out prior to any shooting should be considered guilty of pre-planned terrorism on a public institution and automatically given a life sentence or even death. Why give a individual of this nature the benefit of any doubt?

Obviously this would be after the fact, with the suspect apprehended and proven to be the killer. They don't deserve any kind of a trial. I see murders of this sort an act of terrorism on an educational institution and is something that cannot or should not be tolerated by society.

Harper is simply playing conventional politics. He has NO choice. Is there something wrong with buying votes in Quebec like the Liberals have always done.

It does make sense as obviously the system is to lax in many areas and needs drastic surgery in order to impress respect for law and order. What do you suggest, a big Liberal group hug?

There is no 'right' to government health care.

History has nothing to do with this. Russians do have the same rights as Francophones in establishing their language in the operation of co-op's, but don't, as they fully understand what linguistic arrogance is. Francophones fought for their language to be supported in 613 is B.S. as the English in Ontario were not ALLOWED TO FIGHT BACK. One of these days we will get an English premier with balls to listen to the wishes of the majority English in Ontario to fight against the backwood linguistic policies in Quebec and minority French arrogance in Ontario. It seems totally illogical to me as the large majority in Ontario is English and the most comfortable domestic language is English. Means nothing as there is no official status to it. If you want to play French squatters rights ---have fun segregating yourselves like some Indian tribe. Immigrants are pulling the same stunt. Why not? Quebec did by establishing French as the working language for the entire province of Quebec. When you vote federally, you are only voting for your MPP who generally adheres to the party line on most or all important issues. My vote, your vote and everyone else's vote really means ZILCH. You fail to acknowledge we are ruled by a totalitarian government who is free to do whatever it feels like doing. You don't have any voice in Canadian democracy.

The type of violence you are talking about is equivalent to that a death threat. The perpetrator or perpetrators should be treated with a bullet to the back of the head.

You can't even read. The question was, "what is Canadianism" and I answered it. Obviously you are one of the cultural rednecks who simply won't 'shut up and fit in'.

Canadianism is adhering to our 'White English speaking Christian culture', our social beliefs, our social and religious traditions and our political culture that is before it was destroyed by the Liberals. This of course includes not having any other foreign culture or group interfere with the inner workings of Canadianism.

Can't defend your statement "Canada is such a great place to live" with intelligent rhetoric but rather again pull the race card and resort to labelling of your fellow Canadians with hate inspired words. Do you support a country that had a primary culture that has been fragmented by other cultures? If you do then your living in the right PLACE 'not a COUNTRY' as Canada defies the dictionary primary definition of a 'COUNTRY', 1. (a) The territory of a nation with its own government; a State. ( a territory possesing its own language, people, culture etc." Definiton taken from the Concise Oxford Dictionary.

It is Rod Micleburg who is the jerk and not Bruce Allen. Rod Mickleburg should keep his mouth shut if he cannot promote Canadianism. This is the thing with lefty socialist minorities and visible minorities is that they are unable to defend their interest with common sense rhetoric and take the easy way out and play the race card. This is outright hate to do such a thing against a citizen of Canada (Bruce Allen) who is trying to promote Canadianism rather than have the core of Canadian culture fractured by cultural rednecks who refuse to adapt to Canada's mainstream culture. Bruce Allen should direct some of his energies at the federal government to re-write, modify or scrap the TROUBLESOME AND DISCRIMINATORY, 'Charter of Rights and Freedoms'.

What? To turn from a path of arrogance and obedience to Satan. Must be talking about himself. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/...ounce_sata.html

Oh sure, children and seniors looking for work? Fact is immigrants are broken down in separate classes, which are: 1- Family class, 2-Skilled worker, 3-Skilled worker dependent, 4- Other economic immigrants and 5-Refugees. All these different groups produce different results relating to employment and unemployment but statistics are compiled to include all immigrants despite the different classes. It is done that way.

The study you quoted does not include all classes of immigrants, therefore is fraudulent as it only includes a more narrow age range called 'core working immigrants', (ages 25-54) and on that basis they are more likely to be employed. So what I said is still factual until the 2006 census update becomes available and that is 56% of immigrants are unemployed.

This as nothing to do with co-ops. Russians for example who wish to use Russian have the same rights as Francophones to do so, but don't as any member of the public can apply with the large majority being English speaking. It seems you still do not understand what the Francophones are doing is legal (relating to a co-op) but it seems they are not aware that the large majority of Ontario residents and do not understand French. This is showing a high level of contempt for the majority language English since the majority of individuals that apply are English speaking or other minority languages mostly all familiar with the English language and not the French language. It should be noted Ontario is not Quebec and Francophones in this situation, do not recognize that fact. Do you have anything to back up your totally non-sensical statements? French is not supported in Ontario outside of some constitutional rights that could be discontinued, if the province wanted to take this option. Ontario IS NOT OFFICIALLY BILINGUAL. What does the colonization of Canada have to do with using ANY language of your choice. Our freedoms in Canada allow this. Whether I choose to vote or not, is my business and is a perfectly legal right. Maybe you can then tell us, according to you, what are citizen's of Canada 'democratic rights'?

In 2001 only 44% of landed immigrants aged 15-years and higher were working in 2001, so obviously there is a drain on the system if 56% are not working. The 2006 census update is not available yet, so we will have to wait to see if there is an improvement.

What does this have to do relating to immigrants who initially built Canada? Every country has national self interests including Canada.

This has got nothing to do with Franco-Ontarians representing anything. Fact is they are the only group out of all other different language groups not to use the majority language of the land. Don't you find that contempt of the English language, for a group to use a minority language not everyone is familiar with? I am glad you think you are the supreme authority because I could not care what you say, as it is obvious you don't know the meaning of democracy, but it is also obvious you promote arrogance and hatred of the majority English language.

To-days immigrants are not the same as immigrants of the past who have indeed built Canada. Immigration to Canada were basically White Christian Europeans who came to Canada with nothing or very little and who were not protected by any health care plan, welfare, or other State policy. These immigrants had the same political and religious ideologies as other Canadian citizens and therefore harmonized with the existing Canadian population. To-day immigration mostly is the ethnic variety whose political and religious ideologies DO NOT harmonize with the ideologies of the existing population, thanks to the 'Charter of rights and Freedoms' that actually work against maintaining our current majority Canadian culture dominated by 'White English speaking Christian Canadians' and other cultures who willingly participate with this main culture. To-days immigrants step off the plane or boat from their impoverished countries directly into professional occupations or jobs that pay many times better than the jobs they held in their oppressed countries or are treated with programs or benefits that did not exist for our original European immigrants who also did not have access to quality employment in an already ESTABLISHED country. I would question the reason why officials think Canada must rely on immigration when our main source of income is derived from products obtained by our natural resources that continually increase rather depending on manufacturing like most other countries, where labour could become an issue. Our schools are turning out graduates in all fields and I think there is something more about the immigration issue that government is not telling the Canadian public. Or is there truth that immigrants are being used to establish a new low labour rate standard to force majority Canadians to adapt. This is all the more reason to fight to retain our 'White English speaking Canadian culture'.

It is a disturbing situation what is happening in the U.S. and Canada, the majority White culture being taken over by real supremacist, ethnics free loading off of the White culture and transposing their culture. And they wonder why the White culture is protective of their minority culture. It always amazes me about foreign cultures hating the White culture and labelling them White supremacist simply because they became successful and controlled business of the free world and assumed if you are not 'White' you are a nobody. Let's call a spade a spade, the true hate in North America is, ethnic intolerance against the 'White English speaking Christian culture' period and many White citizens are trying to ensure ethnic dominance will never be a reality.

You have just uncovered the Liberal secrets how to sway Canadians to accept 'Official Languages' and 'Official Multiculturalism'.