LinkSoul60

A US President cannot unilaterally demolish the entire White House, as it is federal property owned by the American people and managed by the National Park Service. Major structural changes or demolition typically require congressional approval. Defend him all you want. It's what you do so why would this be any different... Wars typically require congressional approval as well, but Trump doesn't follow rules, he makes his own. Honestly, for as much as I like the US without Trump in it I have little interest in the finer details of how and why your government works as it does. Clearly your elected officials have no idea how it works either which is all the more reason why I shouldn't care. No, Trump doesn't have to ask for anything. It's his world, we're just living in it. He's a POS....

So, no math, because there isn't any math to back-up something that isn't fact. It is funny though watching your little cranium melt down and tell everyone else they're having hissy fits or emotional crisis' when you're the only one who ever melts down trying to defend their idiocy. The depth of your idiocy though is epic, so I can understand why you flail like you do when you try to intelligent 😂 Now go away fool... you've become a serious bore in this so-called conversation and you're getting annoying. Your exclusive idea of math and facts with no detail is of no relevance or interest to me. You have no idea what you're talking about nor will you ever 🤡

No, the Whitehouse is a public resource that is owned by the American people, not Trump. He needed to ask permission, but in his narcissistic mind he is the only authority of approval. There's a lot to 'nag' about don't you think? 😂

What is that supposed to mean? In your defence, I can imagine how hard it is to always be defending someone that is indefensible.

Come on... You're never going to get through life with a sane mind if Trump is your beacon of hope. You reference globalists but Trump and his family work with and are very active in global business investments. You can also look at him as a globalist for his always transactional approach with global allies and global enemies he invades for financial gains.

In that regard, he's stayed true to what he said. It's a long line-up grievances he has with people and quite comical watching grand juries decline to move cases forward and courts turn them down. I don't think he will, but sure would be nice to see him live long enough to see the karma that biting his diaper ridden ass in a few years.

I agree with you... The priority should be the big beautiful never seen anything like it before East Wing ballroom, and not the fool who tore down your house without asking.

Yes, your lack of morals. It seems that everyone has weaponized the judicial system but only against Trump. Ever stop to think that if it's always the same guys actions that are being questioned, there may be something to it?

Maybe so, but I haven't seen them, but then again, I don't see every quote out here. Yes, Trump is a piece of shît who lacks morals and human decency, but that's never been a question. It was just confirmed again with this pathetic comment. Me... never said or will say I'm the moral standard bearer for anything, but do know I have them. I also have the ability to change my ways of thinking sometimes if I see a reason to. His expiry will definitely be one of those reasons and provide for a good laugh to be had. Just my 2 cents....

You provided fück all because you have fûck all, except for your distorted mind and yappy mouth. Keep subscribing to the theory that if you say it enough times even you'll believe it... What a fool! Damn are you ever stupid! 😂

Maybe I'm naive, but a goal of profiting from a war when people are going to clearly die isn't cool. There are other ways of making money. You keep getting confused on the US versus Trump. I certainly do, and would guess the vast majority of Canadian's very much like the US and appreciate its support. I'd say the exact opposite when it comes to Trump though. Answer me this.... why should we have been the first in line when very little of eliminating Iran has anything directly to do with Canada. I think it could be said there is a point to that for allies in closer proximity to them, but more so.... why aren't the Asian countries involved in helping when they are the ones most hurting because of their dependance on Iranian oil trade? No, I've said that Trump is doing what he thinks is best for his country, which is his job. My only disagreement is with how he has approached that by shîtting on decades long allies rather than having mature conversations before fùcking them over. We can talk about this until we're blue in the face, it's not going to change the obvious.... you don't agree to something that is not a benefit to the country, and clearly, that is why no deal has been made. I'm of the same opinion that the vast majority of Canada's have.... if you only want to a negotiate a win/lose deal, it's not happening and it doesn't matter how long it drags on. Lol... I understand your dislike of liberals and Carney but if you thought clearly for a minute you'd agree that his business acumen is lightyears beyond Poilievre's. Yes and no... Trudeau is very responsible for many of our shortcomings and challenges right now but again, okay now what... Do we sit around and cry about it every day like you guys do or do we put it in the rearview mirror and learn from those mistakes, which so far the new guy seems to have, and move forward. Nothing I've ever been involved with throughout my life was constant complaining tolerated. You were either part of the problem with the bîtching, or you were part of the solution. Your guy lost a 27% poll lead very much because of bîthcing and lack of solutions. Don't be a Poilievre, move on and forget about Trudeau....

Yes we did, and you chump's happily paid for us. Many thanks for that BTW. You seem to have forgotten though that even today, our countries are solid friends. We just happen to think your president is incredibly incapable, but he and that too shall pass.

You clearly can't dazzle with lack of brains you have, so keep trying to baffle with the bullshît 🤡 You never had and never will have any argument to back up your illogical and pathetically bias way of thinking. Back to Mark Twain.... "Never argue with stupid people".... They don't come any stupider than you Fxx

I don't see anyone on 'this side' taking pleasure in someone's death. Your president is a piece of shît. Now when the time comes that he expires, I'll very likely make an exception to my morals and enjoy the moment with a nice scotch while watching news casts of the nationwide parades of celebration.

Show me the math in Dalhousie's opinion piece. Fùck are you stupid.... 😂 BTW, your hero Poilievre doesn't understand it either which caused a good laugh for all of parliament when Carney told the speaker it feels like groundhog day in having to explain this again. It's easier to complain rather than using facts isn't it. From your perspective though, facts are easier to obtain when you make up your own. 🤡

You and your minion friends lack of intellect isn't something that triggers me. I find it more comical that people can actually be as naive and gullible as you clowns are, but it's your stupidity that makes me shake my head. Stupid people everywhere, but you clowns bring it to another level. A perfect example of that yet again is right here.... Legato as usual has no idea what she was even talking about and for some reason you interpret her unawareness of billions in taxes affecting price. You can't read, you can't comprehend, you can't add 2 + 2, and you sure as hell can't articulate anything that makes sense. 🤡

I'm betting his math is better than your Grade 5 level skills. Shît, I'm betting my grandchildren who have yet to reach Grade 5 have superior math skills to yours.

And I'm guessing you knew very little to nothing about him... Of course you would agree with 'Donnie'. Your obvious lack of morals and any semblance of decency align with his. Pathetic...

The most accurate comment I've seen you make.... 'mixed up'. No shît...

The only slants I could have put on the US fleet build-up in the region was, they're either bluffing or they're actually going to do it. In hindsight, I don't think there is any question right now that Trump would have preferred Israel go it alone, regardless of what appears to be pleasure he gets from US missiles destroying infrastructure and people. Exactly, a couple quick one on one calls with trusted allies like the UK and France was all he needed. If they're trusted there would be no concern of leaks. To start a war and then suddenly want to use UK air bases and France support without first engaging them... I think their responses were very appropriate. I don't know enough about Iran's once or current capabilities to comment on the threat they were globally, but if your opinions are fact it only validates my opinion that the US should have engaged allies prior to starting the war. If those NATO countries should have been nervous about being possible targets of Iran's aggression, every and all the more reason to engage them. Again, no other country was invited to this party so I take no offence Canada didn't;t get an invitation. This was supposed to be a two man show, or a one man show in Trump's mind, until it wasn't. I think where we probably differ here is the disappointment you have in how Canada has devolved in our military capabilities and standing over the past 20 years, but more so the last decade. I wholly agree with that but the world from where I sat was a different place and rightly or wrongly we always thought we had big brother next door to help. Clearly it wasn't the way to view the world but we've acknowledged that and are now trying to put on our big boy pants with the plan and dollars being invested to hopefully get us back to being that formidable military ally. 20 years of neglect can't be fixed overnight...

What exactly did the alliance leach... I understand NATO spending and big brother being that deterrent to all others because of the alliance, but where were dollars spent by the US in the wars that have protected us? You'll have few true friends as long as your imbecile president is in that seat, and be working hard for the next X amount of decades to mend those friendships because of his complete ignorance. Take all the friends you can get, you need them.

The price oil is benefitting producers, exporting countries, investors and shareholders. The other 99%+ of the population, not so much. I'll bet that an outcome to the end of this war will involve oil being leveraged and someone profiting from that... That's what the media and other social platforms allow people to do... voice their opinions in any way they choose. A country of 40M people is never going to be the world's police as long as the US, China and Russia have the means and weaponry they do. At best, we'll always be a military support mechanism to the US or the Europe alliance. That works for me. We are headstrong and that's a good quality to have of you have the right values. In regards to Poilievre, he very well may have suggested some valid ideas around trade with the US, but he's a year late in doing and I'm sure the discussions we're having as another year ahead of his thinking. At the end of the day though, it's become quite clear that the US is telling us what they want, not negotiating it. Yes, wanting free trade with no tariffs was the crux of Poilievre's of his US tour messaging. We can only hope that Carney and team have thought of that and bringing it into the discussions. I'm not a political historian and no idea where Trudeau will rank as time goes on, but I agree he won't be looked upon favourably. Certainly won't from me either. The difference though is that I've moved on. There's jackshît you can do about it so maybe time to move on as well...

No, you subscribe to the School of Id!ocy's weekly newsletters. As an alumni I'm sure they provide good reading pleasure for you. Doom and gloom... WTF are you talking about? We're talking about the impact of industrial carbon tax in the price of food.

Send us a bill for being that threat deterrer. You added another $2.2T in Trump's first year and obviously a war is going to cost a lot so have a few bills. A few extra bucks here and there goes a long way.

You cite an opinion with no percentage amounts noted so decide to make up your own percentages. You pull out some costs and next thing you know it's a $1B dollars. You can't even count to 10 and you're saying 'because' in trying to justify how your little cranium gets to 2 -3% carbon tax inflation. You are a monumental idi!ot! I have no idea how old you are but whatever the age....how you made it this far is beyond me. You can be this stùpid when you're away from the computer, are you...