Five of swords

The history of it had a deep impact on all of us and our psyche and genetic archetypes. That was just one thing. There are dozens. The scientific revolution. The industrial revolution. The shadow of the roman empire. Conversion to Christianity. Colonialism. The Treaty of Westphalia. Etc etc. All these events had profound impact on who we are now and left genetic imprints on us

Totally false. I even mentioned one example already...history of manorialism

Sorry but no. There are significant things the various euopean ethnicities do share in common...far more than needed to make them a meaningful category. Even if it was only that they share a history of euopean manorialism that would be enough...but it is so much more

I'm pretty sure I could deconstruct the black race far more easily than you could deconstruct the white race. Thr fact is that Europeans are all very closely related...Europe being a rather small continent. Europeans also all share very important and defining moments in history...the various technological and cultural revolutions happened across the continent.

Then I guess you can stop complaining about black people being enslaved. No such thing. Right?

Huh? Hitler literally sided with Ethiopia against Italy. He only tried to resist the allied invasion...because he was at war...

Google ai is wrong and deliberately programmed to be wrong. Every country Hitler invaded he was forced to. There was simply no option. He had to invade poland because of danzig and the fact he was a genuine German nationalist. Then France and the uk declared war so he was forced to invade countries thanks to that. He was forced to invade the ussr because it was simply obvious that Stalin would attack him at some point (Stalin was happy to wait while Germany and the uk bled eachother...he ultimately planned to conquer both of those countries)...and Germany needed oil from Ukraine. His hand was absolutely forced. And it wasn't because the uk or France or the usa citizens had any reason to fight him for their own interests...it is because jews had bought the politicians in those countries.

He never set out to conquer the world. The third Reich was not the holy Roman empire lol...weird attempt at a bad semantic argument...and not even the hre intended world domination anyway. You are just very poorly educated.

It might seem like a contradiction but I am a national socialist and I picked anti patriot. But then again, I am from the usa. So it makes sense. I am loyal to my nation...but my nation is my race. The usa is anti national

Huh? You mean to pretend he chose to make war with them?

The population getting more old will not be 1/100th of the problem associated with the population getting more brown.

Uh...Hitler lost because he was fighting the 3 biggest empires in the world. One being the biggest empire in human history. It was still close, though.

Well the headline...which is all I bothered to read...clearly suggests that Africans starve when the usa doesn't give them free stuff. So...this is the only possible interpretation...they can't take care of themselves. Right?

I'm literally a national socialist and I am one because I believe it is the most truthful ideology. Truth absolutrly does exist...and national socialists viewed relativists as their enemy. As usual you are saying the opposite of the truth.

So you are admitting that Africans lack the ability to take care of themselves.