Gaétan

Conservative discourses are not only toxic for society, they are toxic for the body too. They generate stress, disrupt the gut microbiota, pave the way for perforations and generalized inflammation. The result: chronic pain, fibromyalgia, and a weakened immune system. In short, listening to these discourses is literally poisoning yourself. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30611610/ '' Highly competitive cultures emphasize the individuals' responsibility for socioeconomic prosperity, but simultaneously increase the collective population stress and thus lower sustainable ontogeny and resilience towards unexpected environmental adversity.''

Doctors have been indoctrinated and alienated by a medical sect to poison the population in order to enrich pharmaceutical companies. Doctors are, in fact, people who have been driven mad and who believe they are doing good. The figures I published online prove that the more medication you give, the more patients you have, by the simple logic that these drugs cause side effects which in turn create other diseases, for which more drugs are prescribed, and so on until the patient dies. Justice must be done for patients who trusted their doctors, took inappropriate medications, and ultimately died, such as from cancer. There are alternative methods to heal people, but their corrupt system trains them only to enrich the pharmaceutical industry. If you have training as a phytotherapist, naturopath, practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine, or nutritionist—methods that can actually cure the sick—and you recommend plants or healthy nutrition to your client, the medical college can prosecute you for illegal practice of medicine and have you condemned by a judge to a heavy fine. Perhaps some people don’t believe me, but the medical training program is a horrible, corrupt system whose goal is to deteriorate the health of the population. What I say is proven by science. You can tell this to a doctor, but he will not want to hear it, because he must first be deprogrammed by a psychologist or other experts.

The body is not made of matter but of vibrations, quantum physics. And just listening to conservatives on the radio puts you in a state of developing osteoarthritis, arthritis, heart diseases, diabetes, and other illnesses — and dying.

Marc Carney went to Saudi Arabia to sell weapons, yet we know that Canada’s weapons are being sent to Sudan. Will the RCMP put him in prison? No, because it is Carney who appoints the person investigating him. Justice in Canada is a profoundly corrupt system. He will plead ignorance, but no one is supposed to ignore the laws of genocide.

These figures show that doctors should be accused of murder.

+---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Dimension | Individualist Societies | Collectivist Societies | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | 💊 Physical Health | Higher rates of chronic diseases | Better public health indicators, fewer | | | (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular) | stress-related diseases | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | 🧠 Mental Health | More depression, anxiety, social isolation | Greater psychological resilience, strong | | | | social support | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | 🤝 Social Solidarity| Weak, priority on individual autonomy | Strong, priority on group and mutual aid | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | 🧬 Emotion Regulation| Less emotional regulation, more risky | Better emotional regulation, greater | | | behaviors | psychological stability | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | ⚖️ Example | United States: mental health crisis | Japan, Denmark: collective balance fostering | | | linked to individualism | health | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+

| Province | 💊 Médicaments ($/hab.) | 🧬 Cancer | 🩺 Maladies chroniques | |----------------------|-------------------------|-----------|------------------------| | **Québec** | **1 100** | 🔴 Plus élevé | 🔴 >45 % | | Ontario | 950 | ⚪ Moyenne | ⚪ ~40 % | | Colombie-Britannique | 870 | 🟢 Inférieur | 🟢 ~38 % | | Alberta | 850 | ⚪ Moyenne | ⚪ ~37 % | | Manitoba | 820 | 🟢 Faible | 🟢 ~35 % | | Nouveau-Brunswick | 790 | 🟢 Faible | 🟢 ~34 % | Quebec: the epicenter of the medication vicious circle It consumes the most drugs. It records the highest cancer cases. It shows the highest rate of chronic diseases. 👉 This is no coincidence. It’s a system that perpetuates illness through overmedication, side effects, and therapeutic dependency. Quebec, champion of drugs… and of disease? In Quebec, we consume more medication than any other province. Over $1,100 per capita in prescriptions, with universal public coverage. But at what cost? Quebec is also the province where cancer deaths are highest. Where chronic diseases are exploding. And where polypharmacy has become the norm among seniors. This is not random. It’s a vicious circle: ➡️ Chronic diseases → massive prescriptions ➡️ Medications → side effects → new diseases ➡️ New diseases → even more medication Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies rake in billions. Health is not found at the bottom of a pill bottle. It begins with prevention, transparency, and the courage to break the cycle.

I see that you are willfully ignoring science.

The RCMP knows that Trudeau sent weapons to the United States to be exported to Israel in order to contribute to the genocide. The Conservative Party is right to say that it is corrupt, but he agrees with these particular crimes.

There are too many conservatives in the country; this is partly one of the reasons why healthcare costs are increasing.

How does Justin Trudeau manage to pay for three strawberries at the hotel where Katy Perry is staying, where does the money come from?

Supporting conservative parties makes people sick, whereas supporting socialist parties makes people healthy. “Psychiatric and public health research demonstrates that individualism, advocated by conservatives, harms health, whereas solidarity, advocated by socialism, protects and improves it. How mental health impacts the body Stress hormones: Chronic anxiety or depression elevate cortisol and adrenaline, which strain the heart, weaken the immune system, and disrupt sleep. Inflammation: Poor mental health is linked to systemic inflammation, which contributes to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and even some cancers. Immune suppression: Depression and prolonged stress reduce immune defenses, making the body more vulnerable to infections. Digestive system: Stress and negative emotions alter gut microbiota and can trigger conditions like irritable bowel syndrome. Chronic pain: Mental health disorders often amplify pain perception, worsening conditions like arthritis or migraines. Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022) – The Bright and Dark Sides of Egoism Finding: Excessive egoism (self‑centered discourse and attitudes) is linked to reduced empathy, increased stress, and poorer psychological well‑being. Frontiers | The bright and dark sides of egoism Frontiers in Psychiatry (2020) – Is Individualism Suicidogenic? Finding: A multinational study of young adults across 12 countries found that higher levels of individualism were associated with increased suicidal ideation and poorer mental health outcomes. Frontiers | Is Individualism Suicidogenic? Findings From a Multinational Study of Young Adults From 12 Countries Western Individualism and the Psychological Wellbeing of Young People: A Systematic Review (2021) Finding: This systematic review concluded that growing individualistic orientations among youth in Western societies are linked to reduced psychological well‑being, including higher stress and loneliness. Western Individualism and the Psychological Wellbeing of Young People: A Systematic Review of Their Associations Individualism, Collectivism, and Emotion Regulation: A Cross‑Cultural Examination (2024) Finding: Research across seven countries showed that individualism is associated with weaker emotion regulation and higher vulnerability to stress, while collectivism fosters healthier coping strategies. Key Studies Showing Solidarity Improves Health Springer – Is solidarity a social determinant of health? (2025) Researchers argue that solidarity should be treated as a foundational concept in healthcare, because it encapsulates justice and inclusion. They highlight that solidarity in health systems reduces exclusion and strengthens equity, which directly improves health outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology – Social Support and Longevity: Meta‑Analysis (2021) This meta‑analysis shows that social support is strongly associated with longer life expectancy and better health. Laboratory evidence links supportive relationships to lower stress responses and healthier biological functioning. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health – The Positive Health Effects of Prosocial Behaviors (2023) Professors argue that prosociality — altruism, cooperation, compassion, empathy — is a critical factor for population health. Acts of solidarity reduce stress, improve resilience, and strengthen social capital, all of which protect health. JAMA Network Open – Prosocial Interventions and Health Outcomes (2023) A systematic review of 30 studies found that prosocial interventions (community support, solidarity actions, pay‑it‑forward programs) were associated with improved health outcomes among vulnerable groups. They also helped reduce disparities in access to care. Takeaway Individualism increases stress, loneliness, and even suicidal risk. Collectivism and solidarity improve emotion regulation, resilience, and overall psychological well‑being. egoistic, individualistic discourse harms health, while solidarity protects it.

Conservatives are corrupt, consciously or unconsciously, to enrich the most powerful and the wealthiest, and this is scientifically proven. A comparative study across 129 countries demonstrates that income inequality increases corruption. The rich have more means and motivation to influence institutions, while the poor are more vulnerable and less able to hold them accountable A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption on JSTOR The article Corruption and inequality: A dangerous cocktail in Mexico shows that political corruption and the concentration of wealth (the richest 10% control 64.4% of the nation’s wealth) exacerbate poverty and violence 3_NN_Corruption-inequality_iMex20-1.pdf Republican tax bills massively favor wealthy individuals and corporations, while increasing costs for modest-income families By the Numbers: House Republican Tax Agenda Favors the Wealthy and Leaves Millions of Working Families Behind | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Billionaires invested nearly 2 billion USD in the 2024 U.S. elections, with a majority going to Republicans. These funds directly influence public policies to the benefit of the ultra-wealthy. Are the very rich taking over American politics? | Brookings Scientific data show that inequality fuels corruption and that conservative policies, in practice, tend to favor the wealthy. Empirical evidence (Mexico, United States) illustrates how conservatives implement fiscal and economic measures that enrich a minority, often at the expense of public services and the majority. The mechanism is clear: the more wealth is concentrated, the more elites have the capacity to influence institutions, and the more corruption becomes tolerated or institutionalized

Science says they are not doing the right things—so on what basis do they claim that investments in war will be profitable? Any crackpot? If there are studies proving that it would be profitable, then let them show them. The government should not commit billions without evidence that it could benefit the population. Instead of wasting our money and plunging us into debt, we should invest in useful things. The media tries to make us believe that right-wing parties are responsible governments, yet Carney is in fact a conservative who is recklessly indebting us and will deprive us of services in order to manufacture bombs. Is he insane?

How can François Legault or Mark Carney possibly believe that massive investments in wars could be beneficial for the population? Do they not know how to count? And then you have journalists trying to make people believe this nonsense. Who is paying them? The $150 million subsidy announced during the elections? If you pour billions into wars, that is money you will not have for essential services like care for the elderly, breakfast programs for children, building affordable housing, dental care that most of the population cannot afford but which benefits millions, or fighting pollution by developing a hydrogen network. Do they not know how to count, or are they simply corrupt? When the Chinese and Russians see that we are investing massively in wars, they will be on guard and threaten to kill us, as they are already doing. Studies prove that this current posture puts us in danger of being killed, whereas dialogue would be far more productive. François Legault sees investments in wars—what hypocrites call “defense”—as a path to enrichment, even though these are 100% financed by debt. Are these normal people? Corrupt individuals or murderers are not normal. What will they do with the bombs? Sell them to Sudan or other criminals around the world to make their investments profitable? One must suspect that the political parties supporting this budget are being manipulated by the cia or their corrupt leaders. This budget must be rejected.

No, because the results are supported by public information and science. If you claim that investments in wars will benefit Canadians, then prove it—by any means you can. How exactly would Canadians profit? By selling bombs to Sudan or other criminals around the world to make those investments pay off? What you are saying on this forum is nothing more than disinformation, funded by the CIA, the American government, or similar criminal organizations.

I have formulated truths and asked the AI to express them based on the available information. AI is “artificial” only in the way it writes texts — the texts themselves are real, just like the federal budget.

It comes from AI based on the budget and what you say comes from the cia more or less

Direct Comparison: Social vs. Defense CriterionSocial ProgramsDefense Spending Beneficiaries~15,000,000 civilians~50,000 people (military + industry) Beneficiary ratio≈ 300 times more beneficiaries— Average annual increase≈ CA$2.8B/year≈ CA$3.16B/year PurposeHealth, education, equality, family supportWarfare, armament, NATO alignment Direct human impactPoverty reduction, well-being, inclusionIndustry profits, limited public benefit Cost per beneficiary~CA$185/person/year>CA$63,000/person/year Summary Social investments benefit about 15 million people, while defense spending directly benefits only tens of thousands. Yet both areas receive a similar yearly budget increase — around CA$3 billion. The human impact per dollar is vastly higher in social programs than in defense spending. Every dollar spent on social programs directly improves citizens’ lives, while defense dollars mostly flow to arms industries and a small workforce.

We know you're paid to sugarcoat the rot.

Can a reasonable person accept a budget like this? ProgramBeneficiaries Canada Child Benefit 6 million National School Food Program 400,000 Canada Disability Benefit 465,000 Old Age Security Program 7.5 million Canada Student Loans and Grants 700,000 $10-a-Day Child Care Services 900,000 Canada Workers Benefit 3 million Canadian Dental Care Plan 5 million CategoryAmount (over 5 years)Description / Purpose ''B'' is billions Total National Defence≈ $81.8 B Total federal defense budget for 2025-2030 Recruitment, retention, salaries, and health care $20.4 B Support for military personnel, improved working and health conditions Infrastructure, ammunition, and training $19.0 B Bases, warehouses, firing ranges, logistics, ammunition supply Military capabilities (vehicles, counter-drone systems, domestic munitions production) $17.9 B Modernization of equipment, armored vehicles, defensive technologies Cyber-defense and digital capabilities $10.9 B Securing IT systems, protection against cyberattacks Canadian defense industry support $6.6 B Assistance to domestic defense manufacturers and innovators International partnerships and military assistance $6.2 B NATO cooperation, foreign military aid, joint operations Average annual total≈ $16.36 B / year Five-year annual average

We know the U.S. government spends millions to pay people like you to spread disinformation and sugarcoat the truth Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that his company was pressured by the U.S. government to censor certain pandemic-related content. Furthermore, Facebook employs former CIA and FBI agents to oversee moderation, raising serious questions about the true independence of online information

It's not necessary to read what you say because you're paid to spread disinformation

A letter in computing is represented by binary code — 0 and 1 — but that’s not the foundation of AI’s knowledge. AI doesn’t derive its insights from binary itself, but from science. You're just spreading disinformation on this forum — you're a former soldier hired by a U.S. government-linked agency.

That's what the government agency told you to spread — disinformation. AI isn't programmed, it uses information recognized as true, as known by science. You're a paid liar, and I doubt you're even being paid right now with the shutdown — you're just having fun lying for the sake of it