CrakHoBarbie

Yeah... Your own battles fought based on moronic assumptions. How weak and pathetic.

Ahhh... There's that white nationalist POS threatening your so good at. How unfortunate that your moronic assumptions were so worthless in every court case poor Donald presented. He, like you, was reminded how stupid it is to present gossip, innuendo speculation and assumptions as evidence in a court of law.

Again, not evidence of fraud. Just your assumption that whatever might be on hunters laptop might of swayed the election towards Donald. That's not viable evidence of voter fraud. It's a weak assumption on your part boy.

Unfortunately, suppositions, without viable supporting proof, are nothing more than an unverified belief.

So many of his ventures have failed completely. That doesn't matter to the alt-right crowd. They love them some billionaires, whether faux or real.

How do you justify claiming your suppositions are based on facts?.....

Remember when Donald said his manipulations of the tax code were "smart"... I wonder how smart he feels now... https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/12/06/trump-organization-found-guilty-of-tax-fraud-at-trial/

Said the guy that claims fraud happened, but cannot present one iota of evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. ... That's what this is all about.... Y'all's failure to present viable evidence to support your suppositions.

Dimwits spewing feeble minded suppositions as gospel. That's all y'all are, fool.

Hunters laptop what?

Yet you fools have yet to produce any evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Your gossip, innuendo speculation and assumptions are worthless everywhere but in your head.

Please act like an adult and present evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law.

It's certainly not your speculations. You have absolutely no proof any outside influence changed the elections outcome at all. Your attempting to push your opinion, speculations and gossip like it were gospel. You have made a claim that Donald lost through fraud yet, when asked for viable evidence, you produce "speculation" . Your "speculation" is worthless in a court of law, boy. Grow the f**k up.

Where's the evidence of voter fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law? Another failure on your part.

Assuming this actually happened, There's no viable evidence any of that influenced the election enough to change the outcome. So, failure on your part. Do you wanna try again boy?

Please present evidence of said fraud that's viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Donald has never presented any evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court law because he doesn't have any. If he did, he would of already presented it.

As I already told you, I'm going by what Donald said. I didn't read the Washington post article. IMHO, the Washington Post is akin to the National Enquirer.

Donald said: “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” ... Clearly, Donald thinks that, because he thinks the 2020 election was fraudulent, that he should be reinstated. And, since the Constitution doesn't have a provision for such an act, it needs to be bypassed. You need to read what he wrote and stop making excuses for your demigod. This is just one more in a long line of statements where Donald manages to fit his entire foot into his mouth..... Again. ......And in you prance, acting like his little ____ boy apologist, attempting to claim he didn't say what he said.

I'm going by Donald's tweet. And it is clear that Donald thinks his opinions warrant bypassing the Constitution. I don't profess to be able to read Donald's mind. I can only go by the words he wrote. And it is clear, by the words he wrote, that Donald thinks his opinions warrant bypassing the Constitution.

And yet, Donald has failed to present any evidence of voter fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. .... That little nugget of reality, you just can't explain away, you gullible fool.

You're such a grand apologist for Donald. One doesn't normally see this type of devotion except in cases of puppy love. Clearly, it's Donald's belief that the only way he could of lost the 2020 election is through fraud, so the country should put aside the rule of law and reinstate him. If only Donald had any evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. But he doesn't.

You believe in God?

It's a good start for you.

I do. And apparently, I care a lot more than the new GOP Congress.

Funny how their first actions aren't going to be addressing inflation nor border security nor homelessness.... No.... The new GOP led Congress will first tackle Hunter Biden's laptop. Proving they are more about revenge than helping America through these troubled times.