CrakHoBarbie

Here's where your logic has come to die. MAGA fools justified their attack on the capital as necessary because they believed the election was fraudulent.... They knew it was fraudulent because Donald told them so. Yet, Donald had no proof the election was fraudulent. Donald is so arrogant he assumed he couldn't of possibly lost the election fairly. All these gullible MAGA fools had absolutely no viable justification for the capital attack. Being "mad" about losing the election is no excuse. And these poor MAGA fools are so brainwashed that they cannot even discern the difference between what's justified and what's not justified.

Unfortunately for those that were gullible enough to attack the capital, they didn't bother to verify that election fraud had actually occurred. No Sir. They took Donald ( a known liar) at his word and attacked the capital for what amounted to gossip, innuendo and assumptions. That is tragically stupid. At the very least, those BLM protesters that turned to violence weren't acting out on a assumption perpetrated on them by a bald faced liar. They had "real" issues to protest.

You hope it's not inevitable, yet you think it's warranted if your nationalist agendas not followed. Do you see yourself as a "patriot" because you believe civil war is warranted?

Yes. One that you, obviously, see as warranted.

It's not a deflection. Your reality is that you see the woke movement as warranting a violent uprising because they don't agree with your nationalist agenda. You've made this very clear through your multiple implied threats. All I can do is point that out to you. I cannot fix your lack of reasoning.

Wow... More implied threats and just excuse after excuse. You do realize that Gore conceded. Something Donald's not man enough to muster https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/algore2000concessionspeech.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi96InRzMr7AhUZL0QIHUEtBTkQFnoECAAQAg&usg=AOvVaw0kdyXd3_iEiBnYR6NvFJ6d

You stated, and I quote: Nobody was trying to start a civil war. But if Libbies keep trampling freedoms...they may get one...and not over voter fraud. Which sounds like you advocate civil war if the " libbies" keep trampling your freedom. That is an implied threat.

I heard you. You don't care if the President is an infantile, obstinate, bully, manchild ....as long as he's a nationalist. You've made your thoughts crystal clear. ...... Now, youve insinuated that, you don't care that a majority of Americans do not support you and donalds Nationalist agenda, and you advocate civil war if these "libs" keep taking away your freedom.... . That's what you believe, correct?

By producing a civil war based on a lie. Kudos to that pretzel logic.

Please point out the last time democrats stormed the capital attempting to stop the legal transfer of presidential power on an assumption. I'll wait. Did a violent mob of Gore supporters swarm the capital because of an assumption Gore made? Which of your "freedoms" have been trampled? And using over simplified exaggerations to try and boost a weak point isn't doing you any favors.

Yes. I prefer my presidents not be obstinate bullies who embarrass my country every time he opens his mouth.

That quality in a president is a deal breaker.

In my World, if a ex POTUS claims voter fraud, he'd best be able to support those allegations with evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Donald was hoping to start a civil war over something he made up. You appear to find nothing wrong with Donald's (and his supporters) willingness to sacrifice our democracy on an assumption.

You mean, all the assumptions, correct. Ok, so what I'm getting from you is that you don't appear to care if the election was fraudulent or not. And the lack of viable evidence doesn't concern you, as long as a "nationalist" president is elected... F**k everything else . Is that basically it?

Oh my... Donald was/is constantly saying stupid shite. Like a child, he can't keep his mouth shut.

I'm talking about evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Not assumptions of irregularities. Trust me, if Donald had any evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, he would of presented it already.

So no viable evidence, just gossip, innuendo and assumptions, correct?

If you were more secure in those beliefs, you wouldn't take such offence when correlations are drawn. I'm saddened that you can't allow yourself to see that... I'd like to remain civil, but if it means I have to stop pointing out the obvious, then that gonna be problematic. I don't "hate" anybody. And if I may offer some advice, don't ever think you have the wherewithal to tell me what I think. Unless you have some supernatural ability that allows you to actually read others minds... Is the term " pixie dust Trudeau" a derogatory slur invented by right wing Canadians? Life's to short to spread so much hate my friend. I disagree. People who act just like Donald are getting more and more prevalent. I don't mean to offend you, but I do not see that as a good thing.

I said, and I quote: "I think what you meant to say is: just call anything that doesn't agree with your bias"fake"..... It's #1 in the Donald Trump playbook." To which you replied: Ya a very challenged person with limited reasoning capabilities...might think that. all I did was support my contention with video evidence of donald saying exactly what I said he did. then you took offence. it makes no logical sense my friend.

If your values are so aligned with Donald's, why get so upset when others point it out? Are you or are you not a trump supporter?

Ok. Fresh start. But if your "personal beliefs and positions on things" align with Donald's, why be ashamed when someone points that out? Tell me, what type of Conservative are you? An easy way to determine this is if you'll answer one simple question..... Do you believe Donald lost the 2020 election to fraud and if so, please present the evidence that made you think so.

Reason10 walked into a dildo shop. They never saw him again

Agreed. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.thewrap.com/trump-cpac-speech/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjNqeyS7cn7AhUSLEQIHYNiDy4QtwJ6BAgBEAE&usg=AOvVaw3lHtm5iCaKHn7fyHp1gjUR

Nope Mr. nonagenarian butt plug, the problem of cops killing unarmed black men (in the States) at disproportionate rates is very real. But don't worry, I think a breakthrough in Alzheimer's treatments may come in time to save what's left of your dimwitted trumpian brain.

Look.... I'd like to move forward and be civil with you..... Obviously, there are some posters here ( reason10) that being civil to is..... unwarranted. But you and I can change that between us.. So, if you'd like me to treat you like an adult, please, let's you and I stop calling each other names, deal? Forgive me... But the "problem" has been identified. It's racial bias, whether justified or not, that's causing cops to target, and kill unarmed black men at a disproportionate rate.