Jump to content

Hodad

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

Everything posted by Hodad

  1. Sure dummy. They got away with the same scam for seatbelts, but that was before you were policing the internet. You caught then red handed this time! Thank goodness the divine creator personally blessed you with the enormous intelligence to protect us from all those dumb scientists and mathematicians.
  2. I agree. It's always best if bad people are brought to justice legally. But there are gaps in the the construction and reach of out justice system. People sometimes take that sense of justice into their own hands. And then nobody quite feels bad about it. Illegal "justice" goes down easier than legal injustice.
  3. Yes, we all know that in your senile old brain facts only count when they are compatible with your precious feelings. Meanwhile, back in reality, it's a matter of public record that Manafort what Manafort did and with whom.
  4. 4 years after covid started and you still can't manage to grasp that efficacy is measured by looking at incidence rates rather than raw numbers. But, to be fair, I wasn't expecting that you would get smarter as the years roll by. 🤷‍♂️
  5. Absolutely there was. It's documented for all the world to see
  6. You are really just a shameless, relentless liar. Trump announced his half-assed China travel ban on Jan 31. While literally on that same day, Fauci was publicizing confirmation of not just human-to-human transmission, but also asymptomatic transmission. Jeebus, if it weren't for blatant lies you wouldn't post anything at all.
  7. I have no attachment to Maddow whatsoever. That first op-ed link was, at a minimum, premature because we've seen in the reports that have followed Mueller's remarkably restrained report, the Trump campaign collusion with Russia was very real. Whether the reality lived up to Maddow's expectations I can't say. Indeed, that second report is very bad. I have no knowledge or awareness of that story, but clearly not journalism. As bad as it is, feels like a drop in the bucket next to Carlson and Co.
  8. Funny that you didn't think deliberately misleading stupid people for money is a character flaw. Oh, I see, you're doing a bit. Carry on.
  9. I definitely blame him. He makes his fortune misleading stupid people. There are literally hundreds of idlots on prison because they listened to the lies he willfully and deliberately told to them. He even felt guilty about it--but not enough to stop doing it for the money. Morally and ethically it's no different than the Nigerian Prince scam. Both make money by exploiting gullible people, there's just no law against lying on TV for money.
  10. Another snowflake who can't stand the taste of his own tactic. Okay.
  11. OMG, I hadn't gotten to this reply yet. If you think his Putin propaganda puff piece was "awesome" then I totally understand why you mistook him for a journalist.
  12. And you didn't like Kamala Harris because she's black.🙄
  13. Nonsense. He's a massive, prolapsed, hemorrhoid covered, shit-smeared arsehole. I'd like to think that real conservatives have deeply held principles. Core values. The pollution Carlson put into the world is not that. Carlson just got paid a lot of money to lie to and influence simple people who don't know they're being exploited. -- By his own admission, he lied to you. A lot. Deliberately and willfully. Take the hint.
  14. Eh, this is a real chicken-or- the-egg story. It's Tucker Carlson. It's he an arsehole because his mom didn't like him, or did his mom dislike him because he was an arsehole?
  15. Sorry, dummy, but when you steal sensitive classified documents, take them to your house and then refuse to return them you forfeit your right to privacy. When you commit a felony and force the government to execute a search warrant to retrieve it's classified documents you forfeit your right to privacy. If Melania's unmentionables we touched (without adequate payment) then the person responsible for that forfeiture of privacy is Donald Trump.
  16. You're really very stupid. And deeply dishonest. Not much else to say in this situation.
  17. Nobody! Nobody believes that COVID was transmitted from animals! You know, nobody except 70% of virologists and epidemiologists. 🙄
  18. Yes, and? -- I'm aware that there's a report. I'm aware that a minority of virologists and epidemiologists hold this opinion. What's your point?
  19. Yes, that's the thing. Biden wouldn't have pardoned Hunter if Harris has won the election Hunter would have done his little time for his little crime. But with Trump advertising far and wide his intent to politicize the DoJ as the official agency of axe-grinding and vengeance Biden isn't going to leave his troubled son to be the instrument of Trump's revenge.
  20. No, it doesn't. Let me re-quote it for you: "COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China." Their "most likely" isn't your "conclusive." And in the scientific community it's not even viewed as the most likely. If you are looking to a political document for scientific rigor you are looking in the wrong place. Scientists continue to find compelling evidence of natural origin, and no evidence to really support the lab leak outside of speculation.
  21. I have no idea whether the FBI did or didn't search dressers while executing their legal (and unfortunately necessary) warrant, but it's patently false to say that Joe Biden told agents to rummage through underwear drawers. That's just asinine.
  22. Jeebus, man, even the political report you are citing does NOT draw the man-made or lab-leak conclusion. You farking quoted their conclusion of "most likely" and still managed to misrepresent it as conclusive. Why are you lying? What do you have to gain from lying in such obvious ways? At any rate, regardless of what you or the Republican house (itself a punchline) think, the majority of scientists (by a large margin) still think that the evidence shows a natural origin, including compelling research from 2024.
  23. Literally all of them. Pick any of those numbers. It's a categorically dishonest rhetorical approach, by dummies, for dummies. "Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested just for flexing his finger!"
  24. Right. He has the experience and credibility to merit the job. Even if I think the direction is insane. The contrast between these sorts of nominees and Hegseth, Gaetz or McMahon is extreme. Even MAGA faithful should be able to see. It should be alarming.
×
×
  • Create New...