robosmith

You'd have to FACE the REALITY of what Trump has done to the DoJ to make ANY SUCH JUDGEMENTS. You've proven your DENIAL OVER AND OVER. Did you even read the "truth" that Trump mistakenly sent to Bondi ordering her to prosecute his ENEMIES? LMAO

Except you DON'T THINK about what will happen in 2028. There are several videos showing him pretending to get hit. Even jostles the phone in the hand he used to push off from the hood of the car.

He didn't fire her. He even made up and imaginary job for her: Shield of Americas. I wonder what she will do in it. gnat girl is a Canuck so she doesn't "have" our DoJ.

Interviewing her FOUR TIMES proves the FBI did not believe it would a waste of time. AKA credible. Traumatized VICTIMS often cannot remember details MANY YEARS LATER. Do you know ANYTHING about RAPE VICTIMS? I had a girlfriend who told me about her experience. She claimed someone had attacked her but she ran away. She was obviously traumatized, and ran away IN HER MIND because she could not CONSCIOUSLY FACE the experience. Of course I don't expect an a-hole like you would have any empathy nor understanding of that.

Getting parts of the story wrong is not unusual for traumatized victims YEARS LATER, dummy. Uncorroborated does not mean unsubstantiated

They do have "immunity" from Federal charges as long as Trump is willing and able to pardon them. Which is NOT forever.

Nope, is says "uncoroborated," which means only that there were no witnesses willing to back her up which is to be expected when both Epstein and Trump were abusing her. And if you bothered to search the newly released documents, you'd find that "unsubstantiated" does NOT APPEAR in them. The Sollenburger substack article says: Next time quote YOUR EVIDENCE or STFU.

And if it's not just a rumor, but TRUE, then what? I KNOW that Noem could have just said NO if that was the truth, but you don't understand why she did NOT. LMAO YOU'RE in a corner and just FLAILING.

And when the officer is violating dept POLICY he is likely to get fired, if not indicted, unless he works for a corrupt boss who works for corrupt Trump.

0 is rounder.

Your faith in the nobility of the pathological LIAR is misplaced. The Ayatollahs gained power due to the corruption and brutality of the CIA installed government.

YOU don't set the bounds of the hearing. Duh And Democrats didn't start "malicious rumors," that were common knowledge in Noem's office. Why do you keep LYING about what happened?

Why do LIARS keep posting BULLSHIT on this forum?

What's a "round number"? 38? or 7? LMAO You MUST be joking.

Because she's misbehaving ON THE JOB with a SUBORDINATE. That AFFECTS JOB PERFORMANCE. HR dept all over the nation get involved with that kind of misbehavior. Are you saying that doesn't happen in Canada? LMAO

When I cited the Strait of Hormuz, gnat girl IGNORANTLY dismissed the danger to the world economy 🤮.

Senior Commanders Break Silence — Publicly Withhold Support from Trump Looks like AI. True or False?

You're a LYING CLOWN.

Ross was "injured" so badly he had to walk at e vigorous pace a block to the death site and then all the way back to his buddies. There is a clear video showing the two feet space between Ross' feet and the vehicle. He actually leaned into the vehicle to give the ILLUSION of being hit.

You apparently did NOT see the video which showed Ross standing TWO FEET away from the vehicle as it PASSED HIM. LMAO He was already severely injured for violating policy when he was dragged after putting his arm in the window of a moving vehicle. At least he was smart enough to learn that lesson and stay well away from Good's vehicle. Duh Can you READ? NOEM DID NOT DENY IT UNDER OATH. Duh

I don't believe a worthy scapegoat is actually a scapegoat. Scapegoats are by definition unworthy of the blame they are assgned. Some like LUser, like their BLINDERS.

Only the cop can decide to VIOLATE department POLICY and CHOOSE to place himself in a PROHIBITED position (TWICE) and SUBJECT HIMSELF to RISK OF INJURY. That decision does NOT place the risk creation on the driver of the car who was TRYING TO MANEAUVER AROUND HIM and SUCCEEDED. Obviously Ross did NOT SEE the POSITION HE CHOSE to be a RISK TO HIMSELF and he WAS RIGHT and NOT INJURED. In FACT, it is OBVIOUS that he manufactured the appearance of RISK with the INTENT of USING IT to JUSTIFY KILLING GOOD,, as evident by him calling her a "fcking b1tch" as she DIED and rammed two parked cars. By MURDERING GOOD, Ross placed other lives in danger, too. Duh YOUR Canuck legal OPINIONS mean NOTHING HERE, so stop proving YOURSELF THE FOOL.

What was the success? Falsely convincing Trump of Democratic election fraud?

Thanks for your worthless OPINION. FBI said she was credible which is why they interviewed her FOUR TIMES. Duh All pages are in EFTA02858481.pdf - DataSet 12

Here are the files: