Realitycheck

You are, again, wrong. I carry no brief for any political theology.

Deny, deny, lie and deny. Trump's approach seems to work for you.

There is no "probably" about it and they are not tiny, but clandestine at the moment. Rather than bombs and shootings here, they infest chat rooms like this one to spread their ignorance and hate. You failed to provide any examples of "radicals from the left". I certainly don't recall any such promoting racial and sexual hatred and violence as the "conservatives" have, do and are.

We are reliably informed by Argus, who knows no wrong, that White racist groups are not found here. Provided with a list of such, he deftly denied they actually existed. Then, surely to his horror, facebook banned a number of them, including some on our earlier list. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/facebook-faith-goldy-ban-alt-right-1.5088827. One is then, left confused as to how so informed an outfit as Facebook could ban groups which, Argus assures us, do not exist? Just wondering...pass the popcorn willya?

He was born here as I pointed out above and is not a dual citizen. He is a racist because he associates with and is supported by racists.

Yah, you know he is way out of his depth when bested by Scheer is is a bright as a two watt bulb in a brown out.

Jane Philpott has just blackened Trudeau's eye...again: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/philpott-says-trudeaus-caucus-expulsions-violated-law. Intellectually Trudeau is no match for either Philpott or Jody. This he proved today with this little ditty: https://globalnews.ca/video/5145683/trudeau-defends-libel-lawsuit-threat-against-scheer. This, from the "man?" who has spent weeks lying about SNC. Oh, the irony burns.

A good read: https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/opinions-trump-s-tax-return-scam-has-taken-yet-another-turn/ar-BBVJDnd?ocid=ob-fb-enca-651&fbclid=IwAR3ELvUvlzIhtC1WloIHBNdxW4QMRV1_zd8Bjpx-q1wc7HJaVsmqppTEdAY Probably pretty accurate. Chump will do anything not to reveal he is not as wealthy as he claims.

SOP for these chaps.

Unlike Chumpkins.

Well, they are, for the most part, religious. Thus they are well trained to ignore facts in favour of mythology.

I use chrome and don't wish to change. But thanks again.

"Regardless" That means 57% to 60% disapprove.

Thanks. Huh? How would one do that?

Once the swamp is drained all which is left is the scum.

he is just ridding himself of the honest ones who counsel following the constitution rather than circumventing it.

I backed it up. You are simply in denial...again. Or is that still?

Shooting the messenger, a popular pastime of cross-eyed whities, does not change either the message or the facts.

Seems like that is exactly the case.

SOP for these chaps.

Clearly you have no understanding of the word as you keep denying facts.

You don't dispute it, you deny demonstrated facts from reputable news sources not merely "three little board people".

Your point is? So what if there are more skin colours than white?

No problem, Scheer will deliver the same message, just a little less honestly.

I have noticed that with you. When you don't defend you deny.