Owly

Of course, he and fat kim are "in love"

So you're happy with a dummy in the WH with his finger on the button? Actually I suspect you can relax a bit as I expect "the football" is being kept away from Trump as they did with Nixon when he fell apart.

Should have taken his advice.

So you would somehow compare Trumps IQ with Obamas?

Or better yet, CANADA is not responsible for deadbeat trump.

I know all about it.

Being do obviously duped is probably not the best method. But it seems Trumps IQ is such that he can easily be had.

We're doing about as much as Trump is short of announcing we are "in love" with the guy who has his finger on the trigger. But then again, they're not aimed at us.

You don't think there might be some validity by such cases against a man who is so crass as to brag about sexual assault?

Obviously trump can't handle it. He's in love with the guy who continues production of the Hwasong 14 missile that could hit New York.

kim brought trump down to his level, not the other way around. Trump confirmed that by saying "we fell in love" tsk...tsk

Let me edify you that there is a difference between accusations and court cases. The latter requires some validity or a lawyer wouldn't persue it.

So you don't mind fat kim aiming a missile at you while your leader stumbles around saying "me and fat kim are in love"? Wow have you been hoodwinked!

Um, no not at all like Clinton. I'm sure I don't need to point out the bs you are trying to imply.

So you approve of your leader cozying up to murderous dictators. Whatever blows your hair back!

What a stupid comment. Are you completely ignorant of how many lawsuits Trump is facing when he leaves office over sexual misconduct? There are many.

Of course, he cares more about what fat kim thinks, or mbs. Now there are some good connections.

What's "overreaching" about my remarks mr. religious man? Grabbing women is ok in your church I guess?

Oh I get it. The EC apparently have no morals. Too bad you have to suffer the embarrassment.

Is there supposed to be some valid point here or just more trolling?

If you can listen to that discussion on that bus with that reporter I refer to, and not come away with a nauseous feeling of what was said, then your little religious ethics comments are av=bout as hypocritical as Trump is himself.

Well then you just answered your own, sort of stupid, question. I'll give you a little hint too, study up in winter weather at northern latitudes. I know that sounds complicated, but you can work on it.

And you are assuming they wanted to be grabbed. You actually think being "grabbed" by the genitals is something women want?

Sure. You and Scheer can go visit with Goldy. "Nerds of a feather"

You seem to troll it constantly. Oh and btw, there is a difference between consensual sex and "grabbing women by the p****y"