Owly

There is ample proof that the Russian hacked DNC emails and turned them over the wikileaks. Trump spoke publicly about his approval of it and also bragged about his "spiritual kinship with Putin". Lots of rubles went into accounts of Trump associates. After all that, if you think that because Mueller didn't find enough evidence to bring charges means that Trump is squeaky clean, I have some property I'd like to show you.

I'm from the real world. Trudeau did push for Trans Mountain but was challenged by the courts who said the environmental impact study was not sufficient. Righties seem to not read very well sometimes it seems.

Apparently you are confused. It's Scheer who supports Goldy.

There could still be things we don't know about the whole issue yet.

Scheer and co will do their best to keep it in the news as long as they can, but it will fade over the summer. Just watch.

According to Barr, Mueller did not find enough evidence to prosecute for collusion. He didn't say it didn't happen and it is well known there was Russian attempts to interfere. There are further investigations ongoing and then there is the obstruction issue. In any case I will wait for the Mueller report to come out rather than Barr's little 4 pager his boss calls "total exoneration", which of course even Barr says is bs.

Whatever they may have spent seems to have been a waste.

Congress can vote to impeach, senate votes to convict. Takes 2/3rd's of the senate to convict. Wouldn't happen with this senate, which is of course why Pelosi said not worth it.

You also obviously don't understand the impeachment process.

You didn't think you were gonna get away with that flimsy attempt to mix apples and oranges did ya? http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/01/30/asylum-seekers-show-up-for-court/

He should look into what rallies are actually about before he goes to them to speak . Or perhaps he already had, which is even worse.

Wrong again. Actual data shows that over 70% show up.

Hard not to believe what you see live on TV.

Trump would probably like a few of those to go with his 6 pack of cokes at lunch.

Too bad about that little get together they had at that little white nationalist shindig eh.

Oh I think Scheer, along with Faith Goldy's help could go much lower.

I don't think your memory failed you. I am awaiting wcm to show us a cite which proves his comments about snc having influenced the adoption of the dpa law in Canada.

Attempt to read this. It's not complicated. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reaffirmed his support for the Trans Mountain expansion project Friday vowing to fight on after the Federal Court of Appeal handed his government a ruling that threatens to derail the pipeline entirely. Speaking to reporters in Oshawa, Ont., Trudeau said the government is committed to building the pipeline the "right way" to satisfy the court's demands. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tasker-trans-mountain-trudeau-1.4806361

We don't know what evidence there might be as to collusion because the Mueller report, for one thing, hasn't been released. Impeachment won't be effected by the house because they know there are too many right wingers in the senate to convict. And as Pelosi said. "he's just not worth it" His pardon doesn't work to over ride state laws as well. Apparently it's you who has the reading problem.

If he doesn't care about jobs in Alta. why is he pushing for the Trans Mountain pipeline to be built.?

Obviously you know nothing of what you speak. Pardon power relates to criminal charges, and has nothing to do with impeachment, which is not decided by a court, but by congress. Hillary has been investigated as to the nonsense you refer to and nothing was found. Nancy Pelosi, who is speaker of the house for one decided not to seek impeachment, for one reason because Trump has too many gop bum buddies in the senate, and because it might be more fitting to let trumps get voted out and then let the SDNY, for one, to bring their charges. And we all know that the Russians did meddle on trumps behalf in 2016, whether he helped out, (which there is no proof he didn't) or not. I can see you are a trump fan, he also flails around screaching about hillary when everything else fails.

Doesn't matter who would suggest it, it would still be illegal. Democrats would be more likely to be knowledgeable enough to know that.

I guess that's why Canadians have chosen Liberals to lead their country more often than the righties eh.

You do realize that what Trump is suggesting is illegal, or do you? What does actually happen is they are given a hearing under law and most are deported.

So you're up for just throwing them in a bus and dumping them downtown. Probably a tad smarter to grant them the hearing the law demands and then you can deport them if they don't meet the requirements. Most of them are.