hot enough

Typical of your "scholarship", Dop.

Nanothermite, Betsy. A 1990s US military labs [Los Alamos/Lawrence Livermore] invention that is not commercially available. It was found in WTC dust, Betsy. Can you not connect the dots? Let me help you. No Arab hijackers had the slightest possibility of getting their hands on nanothermite. The only folks who had it then and have it now are the US government/US military.

A silly argument that has been put forward by conservatives that don't like it that Hitler and the Nazis are pretty much carbon copies of conservatives.

Which you also ignore there. It's my thread, it is on topic so go ahead, Omni. Also address the fact that the fires in the twin towers were not hot at all. "The time to consume the jet fuel can be reasonably computed. At the upper bound, if one assumes that all 10,000 gallons of fuel were evenly spread across a single building floor, it would form a pool that would be consumed by fire in less than 5 minutes" Quote from the FEMA report into the collapse of WTC's One and Two (Chapter Two).

Address the impossibility of nanothermite being present at WTC and the Arab hijackers having done 911.

How silly can you possibly be, Omni. Your comment has absolutely no connection to reality.

It is when you make an assertion without anything. How about the nanothermite? Are you going to deny that REALITY?

There ARE a couple of million people dead from these lies, Hal, the lies, the war crimes, the terrorism you are supporting.

Yet you can't explain how it refutes anything, eyeball. That's not science, that's leaping to conclusions where it is not warranted. How do you, a fellow who has shown he knows nothing about the science of 911, "know who I should and shouldn't pay attention to when it comes to the information I digest". Do you reject US government scientists describing the new super explosives, varying types of nanothermite, they developed in the 1990s? Nanothermite that was found in WTC dust, the by products of nanothermite reactions, huge quantities of iron microspheres, 1500 times normal office dust amounts. Nanothermite that ONLY the US has/had. No one else on Earth had it, certainly not "Arab hijackers".

You fail to note the incredible and unrealistic "gives" to the official conspiracy theory. 1. Imagine that this entire quantity of jet fuel was injected into just one floor of the World Trade Center, 2. that the jet fuel burnt with perfect efficency, 3. that no hot gases left this floor, 4. that no heat escaped this floor by conduction 5. and that the steel and concrete had an unlimited amount of time to absorb all the heat. You know that all things thing were nowhere near reality but you failed to mention them at all. You also fail to mention or discuss the Cardington Test fires where no collapse occurred. You do not possess the requisite knowledge to reject anything.

That is not indicative of the brave dialamah I thought existed. Without any look at the evidence you are "pretty sure this statement is warranted anyway".

Explain how it is pertinent, Betsy.

Wilber, talk about pathetic. Minutes after the hit on WTC1, it was Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden ...

Exceedingly poor propaganda, Hal. The death toll is at 17, with some more expected. I have never heard you folks complaining about all the rank propaganda the world was exposed to minutes after the first plane hit WTC1.

I withdraw my accusation. And I apologize.

You have to be a liar, bcsapper, because the year was described in my post which you quoted and the year was mysteriously edited out.

Either you are so terribly uninformed that you shouldn't even be discussing anything save for if milk is a good thing to add to tea, or you are a gigantic liar.

Precisely, do a body count since say 1970, and tell us who has been the nastier by a gigantic margin.

It's an awful thing to do. What do you think about murdering half a million Iraqi children then another million Iraqis in an illegal invasion?

Yes, it proves how biased you are.

Yes, when reality approaches you, you flee.

From the Islamaphobe "scholar". See above. 'Violence more common' in Bible than Quran, text analysis reveals The Old Testament was found to be more than twice as violent as the Quran http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/violence-more-common-in-bible-than-quran-text-analysis-reveals-a6863381.html

To make any valid point, OftenWrong, you have to show that WTC steel got to whatever temperature you think is necessary to cause any localized steel to collapse. That has never ever happened in the history of steel framed high rises. THE JET FUEL; HOW HOT DID IT HEAT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER?

That would be imagination because it doesn't represent the facts. You've shown that you always have a fanciful imagination. The twin towers were designed to take the impact of a fully loaded 707/DC8 flying at 600 mph. And yes, both the towers withstood what they were designed to withstand. Until they were blown up with US military lab developed nanothermite, which was found in WTC dust.