hot enough

Still zero, that's a big fat ZERO for evidence from the folks who are totally incapable of thinking.

It is truly shocking how supposedly adult individuals can so deny reality. They cling to the most absurd notions, all the while denying stark reality. Why are people so invested in those who would murder their own, people who commit the most horrid war crimes, the most vicious terrorist acts. What is wrong with such folks, why do they so embrace evil?

That is very telling about how deep the cognitive dissonance is. There is zero chance there were any Arab terrorists. All the molten metals, nanothermite, free fall and accelerating collapses describing controlled demolitions and all these "adults" act like little children.

You've had war mongering Americans and Brits do it for you, and seemingly, you celebrate their heinous murder and mayhem, their war crimes, their terrorism.

Typical capricorn nothingness. Have you ever made a post with any substance, a source or two?

Still not a frackin' piece of evidence from any science denying USGOCT anti-truther to provide support for the totally wacky US fable. What kind of idiots would believe the US government, about anything, especially this loony tunes conspiracy theory.

The US were illegal invaders who had no legal/legitimate reason to be in Afghanistan.

Americans are perpetual whiners, even though they murder and pillage the world over.

Why do you support mass murderers, the world's leading terrorist band of criminals? America never was great. If the Nazis had won WWII, they would have been as great as the US has ever been, with, possibly, fewer innocents murdered.

You must get paid by the word, Rue, because you never say anything.

None, not a one. While the USA has paid huge pensions to tens of thousands of murdering war criminals and terrorists.

Typical chickenshit stuff, deny reality so you can go on mouthing your memes.

Typical, chickenshit tactic, practiced by all the fact challenged folks.

You say nothing when the US has been doing radical terrorism against myriad peoples for longer than you have been alive. How radical is it to murder tens of millions of people, steal their wealth, murder their kids, their relatives, and subject them to oppression. It's amazing how you folks jump to the propaganda spiels, blaming "radical" Islam just like, likely, your goofy parents mouthed the commie memes they were taught, still are being taught.

You have never been able to get anything straight. You are one of the most confused people I've ever come across. I only ask you to provide proof. Just provide some evidence if the USGOCT is such a slam dunk. Why doesn't the Murray Street engine match? Why was a piece of landing gear found in a very tight location with a piece of rope attached to it?

How many US war criminals/US terrorists were flown on planes, sailed on ships, ... to illegally invade Iraq and Afghanistan? Did you get in on the war crimes?

Of course not. You're from the land of studied ignorance. A close-minded, brainwashed band of war mongers.

Why is it impossible for you to provide evidence that planes were flown into all the locations by alleged hijackers? All you have done is provide lies, lies that don't even match the USGOCT. And studiously avoided all the evidence that shows it was completely impossible.

No, you haven't at all. You came out here screaming about how these honest, top of their field scientists were scammers. No one here is discussing the science at all. They are all ignoring reality, just like you, with you aiding and abetting them. You are looking for nothing but diversions so you don't have to address all the absolute impossibilities of the USG Conspiracy Theory. 2) Why would you never ever acknowledge and discuss all the hard science questions that I have raised unless you are being a dishonest debater? It doesn't take a scientist to acknowledge that all these impossibilities you all are denying make the USGOCT impossible. It does take a very If you were truly looking for the means, you wouldn't ignore the fact that US government proprietary nanothermite was found in WTC dust. Molten metals with much higher melting temperatures than what the legal fuels could manage were found. You came into that other thread with you opening the 911 issue with you seeking to malign, then as you always do, you pulled the "off thread" BS. You avoided this. Why would you never ever acknowledge and discuss all the hard science questions that I have raised unless you are being a dishonest debater? It doesn't take a scientist to realize that all the impossibilities of the USGOCT make it a crazy choice for rational human beings. It does however take a very dishonest debater!

Why have you changed your dog and pony show? You used to be so proud of the US's myriad war crimes, baby slaughter events, napalming villagers, US death squads, US death lists, ... . Where is the old lover of the Bush/Cheney war criminal team? USA USA USA kill kids kill kids kill kids!

Why is it impossible for you folks to provide any evidence for your wacky USGOCT? No need to reply, we all know.

Focus all you want, Hal. It's a done deal. Stop your governments from committing heinous war crimes and vicious terrorism and you won't have this quandary you find yourself in.

That's for you to ponder, considering that there were no hijackers, you still haven't ever provided any proof of their existence nor have any of you ever provided any evidence for the USGOCT. Why no hijackers? 1. Molten metals above the temperatures that were possible with legal fuels. 2. Nanothermite in WTC dust. 3. Molten steel flowing from WTC2. 4. Molten steel in rubble lasting for six months. 5. Free fall for WTC7 6. Impossible collapse scenario for WTC7 described by Prof Leroy Hulsey. 7. Accelerating collapses for the twin towers. 8. GWB admits/describes bombs at WTC. 9. Engine mismatch for WTC2. 10. More to come ...

As it turns out you didn't post it, but regardless, even if you had that wouldn't mean a thing. You are the person who states that MLW is meant for discussing things, not merely posting a bunch of links. You won't discuss the NIST report you didn't post, because you know nothing of the NIST report. You don't even seem to know there were two. I can acknowledge your point but as to its sanity, there are many questions. You always get yourself in these jams. You are the dishonest debater because you stated you ONLY wanted to discuss this one distraction. Why would you never ever acknowledge and discuss all the hard science questions that I have raised unless you are being a dishonest debater ?

Not at all obvious. In fact there is no proof of any hijackers. The US story is a mishmash of mistakes and keystone cops scenarios. But it got the highly gullible.