Omni

It has nothing to do with grammar, in your case, I suspect.

nope.It depends on how it's used.

Trump has finally found himself a speaker who is just as much a completely ridiculous morbid asshole as he himself is. Scaramucci should be renamed "scare me muchly" "I'm not Steve Bannon, I'm not trying to suck my own c---," Scaramucci said, according to the New Yorker. "I'm not trying to build my own brand off the f------ strength of the president. I'm here to serve the country."

What a feeble attempt to try and scurry away from you obvious phobia.

Ooops I made a spelling error, and apparently you don't have the wherewithal to conclude that "ensuing" was my actual intent. If you can't get that far in language skills, how are we ever going to take you seriously about your scientific "knowledge"?

The only obvious conclusion is it was put there by George Bush.

Nope, the case never got to court. It was an out of court settlement. The lower court did, and then the SCC overturned that decision. Harper fought it all the way as well. We don't but it could have wasted a lot of court time and the compensation could have been for the suit amount.

Ah, once again your comment is rather vague.

WTC was held up by steel columns clad with aluminum, and steel horizontal girders that held up the floors. The impact from the planes did immediate structural damage, and ensuring fire caused the girders to lose their strength until they snapped away from the columns and down they came. And we're all still waiting to see how much longer you are going to duck the question of your nano nano installation theory.

Thank you for verifying what I just said. Are you Curly, Larry, or Moe?

You can create a thermitic reactions in your kitchen. Take 2 rusty steel balls, wrap one in aluminum foil, and then then strike them together. The sparks that are emitted will thrill you. Thermitic.

So you are unaware of the fact everything said on ATC radio's is recorded?

I wouldn't even give him that as there is no substantiated proof of nanothermite. Microspheres due to thermitic reaction yes, but that's due to the ferrous oxide and aluminum contained in the buildings.

Obviously you know as much about aviation as you do about science.

You're wrong again on that. But I'll tell you about some other calls that have conveniently been ignored by the pablum eaters and those are the calls the hijackers made on what they thought was the Icom system's of the A/C to the pax. but they had the switch in the wrong place and were broadcasting on VHF radio.

Psst. If he ever gets around to taking a crack at answering that question, I got another one. How many people would have had to have been involved in this conspiracy, and how after all these years not one has spilled the beans. That should be like pulling teeth as well I expect.

I've heard speculation it was either the WH or the Capitol, but I guess we'll never know for sure. There was no nanothermite found in the cornfield (just like everywhere else) so I guess it wasn't the target.

Still waiting to hear from you on how tons of explosives were installed in the towers unnoticed by people and sniffer dogs. You've been evading that issue from day one. And of course we all know why.

There are 7 of them in all. You should listen to 'em all. Of course the one I just sent you debunks your Jones junk and I guess that would blow you conspiracy theory stuff up.But that's up to you. Keep the blinders on as most conspiracy theorists continue to do.

Every bit as much as anything Steve Jones has out out. You can take the information provided in the video and look it up to verify, if you have any scientific awareness, other than what conspiracy theorists rant on about.

You should watch the little video I sent you and you'll see that's not quite true.

What do you think thermite is composed of.

Silence because they understand science.

So you think illegal prisons is "doing what's right" gotcha.