WestCanMan
-
Posts
18,082 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
87
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by WestCanMan
-
-
7 hours ago, eyeball said:
How do you manage to even get out of bed in the mornings?
Do you understand that the jab actually kills people, eyeball? Do you understand that every time someone takes the jab, they're rolling the dice with death?
Our own gov't has acknowledged that the jab kills people.
It's just not serious about finding out how many. It's just serious about not finding out how many. Or even burying that information entirely.Do you understand that there's a massive swath of people in this country who are at absolutely no risk whatsoever of dying of covid? Why should they be forced to take the jab? Why were they forced to choose between economic devastation and a dangerous jab that they didn't need?
Why do you put laughing emojis on posts about people who were killed by the jab? Are the deaths of children funny to you?
Officially, over 400 were already killed by Jan 2023. Ten times the number of people killed at Glencoe, which you're still furious about, over 300 years later. Over 10,000 people were seriously injured by the jab Are they also jokes, eyeball?
I hope that you get caught laughing about this by the father or brother of someone killed by the jab. I'd pay good money to see that.
-
15 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
I firmly believe that the Palestinians are entitled to to their own land too. Just like the jews were given land by the UN, the Palestinians should be given land too.
They had their own land. They had Gaza 100% to themselves. They chose to use it as a staging ground for terrorist attacks. Now it's being treated as.... a staging ground for terrorist attacks.
Does that make sense to you?
-
9 hours ago, eyeball said:
There's a little but for sure it's mostly left.
Why did you put the laughing emoji on a post about young people killed by the jab? Do you think it's funny that people were killed by a jab they didn't want or need?
-
3 hours ago, impartialobserver said:
interesting how when i point out that you rely on assumptions.. you never respond.
You're an open book io. Your posts are formulaic. I don't have to assume anything.
You pretend to be some kind of authority on a topic, then when you're asked to display some kind of next-level knowledge you say say that you just don't really care about the topic, you cast aspersions, rinse, repeat.
Nothing that you say is ever truly on topic.
3 hours ago, eyeball said:There's nothing wrong with me.
There's nothing right, that's for sure.
Quote...and what on Earth are you guys talking about?
Jabs that kill people. Sometimes death-row inmates, sometimes healthy young Canadians who just wanted to keep their jobs.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Goddess said:
Quite a few scientists wondering the same thing:
Have we been CRISPRed for the coming Cas-9? (substack.com)
I have two questions in my head. How readily would integration events with PAMs occur in any given transfected cell, and did anyone actually have this in mind? If a Cas-9 protein were to be instructed to be made as part of another ‘vaccine’, would the interaction with the Cas-9, the sgRNA (also introduced exogenously) and the integrated fragment result in cutting? Or is this about gene silencing or activation? Theoretically, you could introduce stop codons or alter a mutated gene using this method. You could also add transcriptional activators to the Cas-9 to activate transcription machinery of specific genes, ie: the modular aspect I mentioned previously. You could also inactivate transcription to physically block a gene. The possibilities are wide-ranging.
Questions to ponder: Why is this conserved fragment (1252-1289) in all of these products/vectors/sequences? Why are they sitting upstream from a PAM (CGG)? Could they be a target DNA for subsequent gRNA-Cas-9 system administration?
Pretty dark questions. What would possibly be the purpose, if the outcome of ‘installing’ this hardware in the genome - logistically - could never really be predictable or reproducible? Is it not predictable/reproducible?
With regard to using the gRNA-Cas-9 system to get rid of HIV, you can also use it eat certain bits of the integrated HIV-1 genome to disable it. Take that, HIV. In a paper published in 2013, a codon-optimized gRNA-Cas-9 system was used to target the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of HIV-1. The designed gRNA was complementary to the LTRs. Using transfection, the gRNA along with a humanized Cas-9 was introduced into mammalian cells using plasmids.19 This idea is reminiscent of the trojan horse technology of the LNPs that, according to recent findings, also contain plasmids and plasmid DNA fragments.
The gRNA-Cas-9 system can also be used in the context of the ‘shock and kill’ strategy to eliminate HIV from the system. In this case, the gRNA-Cas9 system is used to activate latent HIV-1 viral reservoirs so that drugs (antiretroviral therapy (ART)) can be used to kill latently-infected cells. Kind of like smoking out the bees. A paper was published in 2022 entitled “SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes latent HIV to Nef-specific CD8+ T-cells”, where the authors describe what sounds like an unexpected shock and kill result (strategy).20 Basically, the COVID-19 modified mRNA injections shook up (productively-engaged) HIV-Nef-specific CD8+ T cells - the ones that kill virally-infected cells - and resulted in a reduction in cell-associated HIV RNA, which is a measure of HIV persistence.
There has been a lot of HIV-related ‘stuff’ in the woodworks with regard to the COVID-19 saga, and it has really left me wondering why. And how. Besides the fact that the spike protein is structurally and compositionally similar to gp120, why was there a specific test group in clinical trials for people who were deemed HIV positive, and why were people being encouraged to be screened for HIV post injection?22 It has been reported that other vaccines can induce increases in cell-associated HIV RNA, and it has also been reported that increases in cell-associated HIV RNA can be accompanied by modest and transient increases in HIV-p24-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, so does this explain why?2324 Were certain people in these fields just curious to know the effects of this new, experimental technology on HIV? Maybe.
To me, there seems to be a lot of ‘surprising’ overlap. I mean, yeah, regular screening was probably reduced because of the psychotic 2-weeks to fatten the wallets thing, but still. The aforementioned paper actually states that the “rate of acute HIV infection (AHI) diagnoses per day was significantly higher during the pandemic compared with the prior 4 years”. I personally don’t buy that this is due to higher frequency testing exactly because routine HIV screening in health care settings was reduced (these likely would have balanced each other out, if anything, in my opinion), so what’s with the higher frequency HIV diagnoses? We’re talking about acute infection - the beginning; new infections - so, what is going on here? Maybe more people were being promiscuous? More IV drug use?
I find it weird to even think about something like that, but that's where my level of trust with this gov't is at.
-
23 hours ago, Goddess said:
The doctor in the ICU where he was, told me it was a 21 bed ICU with 30 patients and that they were busier then than at any time during the pandemic. There were a lot of young-age heart attacks up there at the same time as him.
This was Thunder Bay ICU.
This kind of thing can't stay hidden forever. Either it's going to bust out, or something has to happen to make the covid jab seem successful all of a sudden.
I wonder if the jab actually does protect people from something, but that 'something' hasn't been released yet. Something called the 'onlycultistsareallowedtosurvive' variant
-
2 hours ago, Goddess said:
I have a friend in the US who, for many years, has been very 'Free Palestine". I have always kind of avoided any discussion with her on the topic because in her view Israel = evil, Palestine = 100% innocent angels. And I've always suspected the truth lies somewhere in between there.
The question for me is "What does 'Free Palestine' mean to the government and people of Palestine?"
These demonstrations and rallies in Canada and the US, in my opinion, show that to Palestinians - it means the eradication of Israel as a state and the killing of Jews worldwide.
I am upset to see these ones openly chanting about killing Jews and watching gov't and authorities do next to nothing about it. In Canada.
Gaza was free.
The Israeli gov't completely pulled out of there over a decade ago and left them to be 100% autonomous, but with free electricity.
The Gazans spent all that time making Gaza beautiful, and creating prosperity for their people. 😂 J/K, they spent all their time and money getting weapons and rockets, plotting genocide, and then tried to overwhelm the Iron Dome with 15,000 bombs.
Hezbollah was supposed to launch some of their 150,000 rockets at the same time but thought better of it.
-
1
-
-
On 4/21/2024 at 5:09 PM, CdnFox said:
He's not a candidate. He's a former president. They ALWAYS qualify - period.
People go after former presidents. The whole deal is that if you're president, you KNOW you're going to honk people off if you do the right things no matter how hard you try otherwise, so you are granted protection so that you can make decisions freely and not fear being killed later.
Not just that...
The worst case scenario is actually that a former leader gets kidnapped. Then what?
He's tortured to gain information? What does that information cost the US?
What if he's ransomed...? What does that cost the US?
How humiliating is it if a small-time terrorist group captures the POTUS? Or a country that no one has ever heard of? Or a major geopolitical foe?
The 'prominent House Democrat' that you're speaking of is dumb enough to get elected. I'm gonna look to see who it was, and go place a bet in Vegas that they get 'elected' at some point.
-
11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
And there we go with more assumptions.. you think that I am in agreement. I simply observe and collect data, so to speak. Honestly do not agree with most of them. What would you do if you could not rely on assumptions? I am not sure I want to know the answer...
I just wonder what would happen if you ever tried to state an actual on-topic fact or stat.
Obviously my jaw would hit the floor first, I mean after that...
-
1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:
I already did... I stated that that the "democrats" that I know have variance in their views and hence not cult-like. If you do not like that... you could be grown up and keep scrolling... really
You 'stated' something flawed.
Bottom line: A cultist looked around the room at the other cultists and thought to himself "We're all in agreement, and we all get along quite amicably, that's proof that we're normal. Everyone outside of this room is f'ed up."
-
5 minutes ago, eyeball said:
TBH, there are a lot of parallels there with the jab.
People didn't have a choice, they were killed by a lethal injection, and their loss was considered "OK" by leftists.
-
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Maybe in this scenario.
We're not talking about your sex life. What's wrong with you?
Just now, impartialobserver said:off topic ^^^ as always. You can never address my points directly. I know your types.
OK, let's play a little game...
You make your first on-topic comment, and I'll reply to directly to the merits of it.
-
3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
I made a point (not in response to you.. easily proven), you responded and every time you respond.. you go off into the weeds. Pretty simple stuff honestly. why you respond is both amusing and pathetic.
People need their welfare and UI. Get back to work, great one.
-
2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Meh...I'm not sure Brandon can even remember what Biden said back in 2009.
I never thought I'd see the day that G W Bush looked like an upgrade in the WH.
Hell, his cat would be an upgrade.
I'd rather see GWBush's equally retarded cat swatting at goldfish in the nuclear briefcase than see Joe toting it around.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
Another example of your passion/zealousness getting in the way of you saying something true. I have never stated a pro-vax statement. I have said dozens of times that I did not care... "did not care" is not the same as "vaccinations are/were good"... You must have some dyslexia.
You spend an awful lot of time obfuscating threads that you don't care about...
-
Biden may be the only guy dumb enough to start a war when he wasn't even the president, then those f-tards went and 'elected' him, now they act surprised when wars spring up all over the place. 😂
"Uhhh, Crimea was Twumpie's fault! 🧐 "
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
Sure - he cleans a lot but that's no reason to insult him!
oh... vacu OUS. right. That's my bad.
Vacuous is a great descriptor for a posting-bot with the intelligence of a Roomba.
A poster called something liiiiike.... Roombosmith
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:
Lol...so silly.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/world/europe/22biden.html
I had to snap this screenshot before the paywall went up so it's not perfect...
Here's another screenshot:
Leftards: "Nah, Biden pimping Ukraine in NATO had nothing to do with Crimea or the current war..."
-
1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:
Again.. I have stated three times now that those liberals/democrats who I have met and interacted with exhibit consider variance in their view.
Your anecdotal/unproven evidence is interesting, but video evidence of violent groups destroying communities based on false narratives for months and months on end, supported by Dem politicians is far more compelling evidence than what a random internet poster claims to have seen from the end of his own nose.
QuoteI am not sure how you can't comprehend this.
I can comprehend it just fine, I'm just not overestimating the worth of your opinion.
I can prove that M Brown was a violent criminal, and that Dems and the MSM made him out to be a gentle soul who shouldn't have been bothered by cops.
I can prove that Demi politicians supported violent riots for months based on that false narrative.
How does that stack up to what you claim to have seen?
QuoteYou paint everyone with the same paintbrush.
And yet you're a vax-apologist of the lowest order... a blind believer, and a stone-faced denier of facts and stats.
You belong in that cultist boat, so why should I believe that all the people you consider to be fine and rational are any less devoted to the cult than you are?
The people who were throwing Jews into the ovens felt like their fellow Jew-chuckers were normal people, right?
I feel like the people who I agree with are normal. Right? "So what do they believe?", you ask... Mainly - THEY BELIEVE IT'S F'ING WRONG TO FORCE YOUNG, HEALTHY PEOPLE TO TAKE A DANGEROUS, EXPERIMENTAL VAX THAT THEY DON'T NEED!
And yes, the word 'dangerous' is perfectly suited for that spot in that sentence because a lot of scientists believed that mRNA vaccines actually weren't safe yet.
QuoteI could say that all UI claimants are braindead because the few that find their way to me are generally lacking brain power.. ie, spelling their own name incorrectly or thinking that I can add zeros to their benefit amount because we are "bros" or such. But most are not braindead and can follow simple instructions.
"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twian
It's funny, but sometimes generalizations are just unfortunate observations.
For example, a lot of people said "mostly peaceful protests" but they were all lying. They all knew that the peaceful protest next Friday at 4pm would turn into a riot at 10, but their handlers told them to use that phrase - so they did, unquestioningly.
How many times in a row could all those retards be surprised that another riot followed the 'mostly peaceful protest'?
At some point you'd think they'd figure out that there was some kind of a pattern...
Nope. They just kept on saying: "These are mostly peaceful protests and we need money to bail people out of jail on Monday morning again, for whatever reason. I dunno, maybe they keep ending up in there because all cops are racist? Solution? Easy peasy... Defund police."
Yeah, your peeps are just fine, io. 😂
-
20 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
Again, I am talking about the individuals/voters not the elected officials. I know that you can't separate the two. I am not sure how much more clear I can be... If I am in a cult.. I am the most detached member of the cult ever considering that I do not attend rallies and never have, do not follow stuff on Facebook, and have a general loathing of all politics. But its your story so do not let me distract you.
1) If you're detached then you're not really a Demi
2) voters are the cultists who protest at SCJ's homes, or who burn communities because the violent criminal known as "Gentle Giant M Brown" was killed in a wrestling match with a cop, or who come here and pretend that the jabs are safe, or that the deaths of some healthy young people was worth it without even quantifying that...
Eg, how many vax-killed is a few? How healthy were they? Did they take it because they were forced?
How is it possible to just say "It was fine" without even knowing the actual answers to those questions? It's pure cultism to just say "WE BELIEVE" without asking any of the important questions. That's "blind belief", aka 'cultism'.
-
11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
Well.. my experience with leftist/liberal voters/individuals differs from yours. I see quite a bit of variance and always have. Yes, they vote for Democrats mostly.. duh moment. Just like conservatives vote for Republicans even when their views do not exactly sync up on a 1 to 1 basis. If the voters were a cult.. there would be tangible consequences. Someone typing insults on a keyboard and you reading it.. is not a tangible consequence.
There are tangible consequences. In Canada Liberals get kicked out of cabinet positions and even the caucus for not toeing the line. They're not allowed to air dissenting opinions or they get kicked out of the party.
In the US they have protesters follow them into the toilet, or to their homes, and the party is ok with that.
When did conservatives here kick anyone out for voting the wrong way? When did Trump say it was ok to have protests at SCJ's homes, or to have people follow MTG or AOC to the toilet to yell at them?
It's hard to recognize a cult from the inside, but you're in one.
-
18 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
When I see the word, "democrats" in this context.. i think of all democrat voters or liberals not just the elected officials. Of course, elected officials have need to band together. Their legislation only passes if the group is on the same page and they get enough votes.
1. Elected Dem officials pimp lies and false narratives, like "pandemic of the unvaccinated" and "mostly peaceful protests".
2. That's not how our democracy is designed to work. We're supposed to have regional representation and in the case of the libs/dems, we don't.
And especially this: THE DEMS AND LIBS SHOULD NOT BE PUNISHING ELECTED OFFICIALS FOR PROPERLY REPRESENTING THEIR VOTERS AND THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTRIES.
QuoteAs for the individuals out in society, my experience is that there is quite a bit of variance in their views. Secondly, if one individual (not elected official) differs from the group, there is no tangible consequence. Yeah.. so someone on Facebook disagrees with you. Anyone who actually reads the comments shows their distinct lack of IQ.
Leftist voters are sheeple. They'll shriek their lies they're told to shriek, even when it's harming their own friends and family. IMO that's weird/repugnant.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:
Whereas conservatives believe in personal freedoms
Ironically that's the birthplace of liberalism.
Quoteand responsibilities.
And the opposite of modern liberalism.
QuoteAnd you can't have that in a herd. So they pick personal freedoms over the needs of "Society".
I don't think they put personal freedoms ahead of the needs of society. In the case of the jab, I don't think anyone ever made the case that there was a need to jab people.
You could argue that there was a need for a jab, but we never got "a safe, effective vaccine". No one's self-determination needed to be squashed in favour of the pseudovax.
-
So the Dems are earning legitimate consideration as a cult for all the reasons mentioned here - mainly a series of blatantly false narratives which instantly become "my hill to die on" for millions of Dems, and which are required screeding for everyone who doesn't want to be cancelled - and now in a tit-for-tat, leftists are calling the GOP a cult.
It's just drivel.
I can have whatever opinion I want as a conservative and my bank account won't be frozen by other conservatives. No conservatives will dox me. No conservatives advocate for protests outside of SCJ's homes over a ruling we don't like, especially one as simple as "This isn't our business, it's a state matter". Staying out of other people's business isn't the hallmark of a cult.
I could take the vax, object, or even regurgitate claims of efficacy if I wanted, and still not get cancelled by fellow conservatives. The only thing that draws the ire of conservatives is advocating for children to take it with no reason why or forcing people to take it.
The people who advocate for forcing people to vax are obviously far more cult-like, right?
-
1
-
Anti semitism all the rage on US college campuses
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
So he's condemning himself then, because we all know that he's mentally incapable of understanding "what’s going on with the Palestinians.” I can guarantee he has no clue, even if he was told yesterday.