Exegesisme

Not emulate, but creatively learning, as their primary election for nomination, their senate. The real voting rights of MPs, the borderline of the executive branch and party discipline, the power of senate. The rights of citizens in detail need a more specific and practical law and should be away from constitution. What do you admire in USA?

In this express, the second half is related to the first half, according to context, why=the reason of the excellence of USA. Certainly it is meaningless if I ask why "our Canadians are so near". Thank you for your concern.

2 Forming Great Canadian Leadership, What They Should Do​ By Exegesisme USA is so excellent, our Canadians are so near but do not know the reason of its excellence. On my observation, the gene is their excellent, clear, and simple constitution, the traits are their elections, political culture formed from their elections, and broad leaderships formed from political culture. To our Canadian constitution, the written part is too long and too obscure, and even some important part is unwritten, too many secondary affairs are in the constitution. A good constitution should put all secondary affairs away, and concentrate on the formation of national political leadership, which begins from the liberty and rights of citizenship. Even to our Canadian federal elections, as the most recent one, are just as fast foods, can feed you away from hungry, but lack enough all necessary nutriments. The campaigns are far from enough contests, the candidates are far away from the people, who even do not know the person they will vote for. Canadian political parties do everything for their candidates, who even need not a primary election for nomination. The easy and weak election makes the weak political leadership and weak political culture. The weak political culture makes weak political people. The weak political people lack intentions and preparations to play good leaderships in all other affairs. This is the core reason why our Canadians have not made more contributions to human civilization. Not because we lack creativities, but we lack great leadership to promote the creativities forward. To say in detail, our constitution lacks the arrangement to concern the equal rights of minority, which provides the soil for the growth of separatism. We need a senate which can show the equal rights of minorities, as a place to supervise all sorts of majority. We need designing a new constitution, in which all issues of power are solved or avoided, from which great leadership can logically grow. This should be a national goal of all parties and a great and long mission. What should they do? They should invest in the growth of all sorts of leadership under the long mission, especially through such two things, establishing primary election system and reforming senate on equal rights of minority.

You estimate something you do not know, so always be humble and be not arrogant.

1, my concept holy good capitalism is new. I first got the idea of good capitalism, and searched the internet, others already uses this idea to express continuous economy development on entrepreneur capitalism plus big firm capitalism, and also there is an idea common good capitalism to express the meaning of capitalism to be good to common people. To distinguish from them, I use the words holy good capitalism to express my idea as I show in the topic. 2, as to the part of my statement you quote, it clearly distinguishes the benefits of all Canadians and the liberal view or value of the benefits of all Canadians. This distinguish is crucial for the constitutionality and legitimacy of all Canadian governments before, and so do this one. Here I not only stress it again, but also stress it under the concept of holy good capitalism, the context of this stress is new, and the new context endows the distinguish new meaning which is still in state of development and creation, and welcome you take part in the development and creation of this new meaning, and also welcome everyone who concerns the future of Canada. 3, as the word UPON in constitutional statement "Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law", I use the word UNDER in my statement "but also stress it under the concept of holy good capitalism", which makes the concept holy good capitalism is not a common context, but plays a supremacy role in understanding the crucial distinguish. 4, the distinguish should be stressed again at the beginning of the new government, for the common confusion of the representative duty of a government. This confusion easily misunderstands the representative duty, and believe the liberal government should represent the liberal benefits. This wrong understanding even becomes major idea in this website.(1) 5, the common wrong understanding of the representative function of a MP(1) also easy extends to the representative function of the Canadian style government, which is formed from the legislative body and also controls the legislative body through very strict party discipline. The wrong understanding also causes too many unnecessary conflicts of parties in the parliament and in elections, and causes wrong policy making and wrong behaviors of a party. I stress the distinguish under new core concept at the very beginning of the new liberal government, hope the new government can make a real and new change, get rid of partisan conflicts and concentrate on the benefits of all Canadians, their legal rights are only the rights to view the whole Canadian benefits through their liberal eyes. So do other parties, each views the whole through each value, but the whole is the same. Reference (1) http://mapleleafweb.com/features/house-commons-introduction-canadas-premier-legislative-body

1 Holy Good Capitalism, What They Should Do​ By Exegesisme My concept, holy good capitalism, is inspired from Canadian constitution, verses in bible and the Liberal winning of the election 2015. 1, Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law. 2, Genesis 1:4, God saw the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. Revelation 21:24 The nations will walk by its light. The light in the verses above, in our era in Canada, here and now, I understand as holy good capitalism. In the holy good capitalism, there are two fundamental wings. One wing is holy good, which is our environment and from God, we can not live without environment or holy good. In this wing, everyone is equal. The other wing is human good, which is created by human in the environment from God, we can not make progress without human creation inspired by God. In the human wing, people are not equal, peoples are arranged in a hierarchy of creation according to their creativity. According to the model of holy good capitalism, the just elected liberal government is not only the government of liberal, who directly voted them, but also and first is the government of all Canadians, it is in the political system of all Canadians they were elected. Therefore, all policies of this government, should consider two requirements, the benefits of all Canadians and the liberal view. This is the answer of what the liberal government should do.

Political slave is at the opposite of political elite. What do you mean political elite?

Meaning on your political elite.

The humble skills of estimation on the tendency of the right poll numbers.

The newest results: Lib 191, Con 104, NDP 32, Bloc 10, Green 1 My estimation. 175+-20 97+-15 42+-8 19+-10 2+-1​ Only NDP 2 seats lower than my range of prediction, all others are in my prediction. ​

The new: results: Lib 191, Con 104, NDP 32, Bloc 10, Green 1 Only NDP 2 seats lower than my range of prediction, all others are in my prediction. ​

the most new: results: Lib 189, Con 105, NDP 33, Bloc 10, Green 1 Only NDP 1 seats lower than my range of prediction, all others are in my prediction. ​

Only NDP 2seats lower than my range of prediction, all others are in my prediction.

the most new: results: Lib 189, Con 106, NDP 32, Bloc 10, Green 1

My prediction all are right. results: Lib 186, Con 104, NDP 35, Bloc 10, Green 1 My est. 175+-20 97+-15 42+-8 19+-10 2+-1

So, are you a political slave?

You do not get the idea of my thread. In this topic, everything are faulty except truth. This is the strictest standard for understanding the idea of truth. I use "science is not truth" as headline, aim at stressing the supremacy of truth. Your argument is truth in common faulty understanding.

This is about essence of time. Usually, science understands time as a dimension, and this dimension is very abstracted, and can be together with anything, however, as I argued above, time can not be with truth. I accept the scientific idea of time, and also establish my own idea of time. In my idea of time, time can exist as many dimensions. For example, as the idea of my time, has such many dimensions: my time of meditation, my time of study, my time of action, my time of thinking, my time of speaking, and so on. Each dimension of time means differently. You go through one dimension of time, and can go back in other dimension of time to reexamine it.

In my view, strictly, science is the fifth way to reason the images of truth. Meditation, aesthetics, faith, and math are ahead of science.

EKOS Seat Projection Lib 151 Con 116 NDP 54 Bloc 16 Green 1 Numbers are in or around the ranges of my prediction. My prediction is more positive for Liberal.

Do you think the scientist Newton is an elite or a slave?

Time is important, truth is more important, and life tries to approach truth in various styles of time.

Here there is a little about philosophy of time. From our experience, we can not say truth is in past, or at now, and even in future, for everything in time is imperfect. Truth should be absolute and perfect, so should only be out of time, and human can not know truth directly.

Not challenge, but realize and admit this actuality, and learn from them at where we can. Historically, all great power are grew from small with an excellent core. So we only need to worry whether our core is excellent enough or not. What we do is just design an excellent core for our offspring, just as USA designed its constitution more than 200 years ago.

The first step of the strategy is to approach and learn. The second is to improve for both them and us. The third is to go foreword.