Search the Community

One of my average Joe's banners has been tampered with. The image of Margaret Chase Smith, a respected US Republican figure, was removed. The second part, logo was covered with a perplexing message: "Defund NCFST." This message aims to highlight the connection between child welfare and the legacy of residential schools, as recognized by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (SEE PICTURE BELOW). What's worth noting is that this message further suggests that Native Child and Family Services of Toronto (NCFST), a mandated children's aid agency, receives extensive funding and is predominantly led by individuals identified as "white." To the person responsible for this act, if you're reading this forum, I invite you to engage in a fair analysis of the issues surrounding child welfare and leadership. Register, wait for 5 posts, and share your grievances, however, let's refrain from making sweeping generalizations. The space on the banner could have been used for constructive discussion instead. Lots of space on the sides. Blaming entire groups in society, as you blamed "white people" here, oversimplifies the matter, is reactionary, superficial, and counterproductive. As a matter of fact, I know my history, you would have wanted someone like Margaret Chase Smith during McCarthy's time to help you. Perhaps I am not adequately informed about this agency and the challenges it faces. That's precisely why I intended to initiate a conversation. I am sure other people more know than I do. Do you agree with this message? Why and why not?

No Challenge to the Leadership of USA Globally​ By Exegesisme By tracing political culture of USA, I get a feeling that there is not real challenge to the Leadership of USA globally. The leadership of USA globally is trained in their inner political campaign and the political culture formed in their inner political campaign. No any other nation has so strong and peaceful campaign than USA. The people are educated how to lead in every area with the political culture formed in the campaign, no any other people has a chance to play a leadership higher than the people of USA can play. Although there are many challenges in practical benefits, all these challenges are not any importance of replacing the position of USA globally, and are only important to promote USA to improve its global leadership. In other words, there is no challenge prepared itself well enough to replace the position of USA with global progress.

Should Carson Drop Out or Not?​ By Exegesisme "The leading Muslim civil liberties group in America called Monday for Republican Ben Carson to drop out of the presidential race after the retired neurosurgeon said this weekend that he doesn't believe any Muslim should be president of the United States." http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/politics/ben-carson-muslim-president-cair-drop-out/index.html Recently, I have found that leadership by value is greater than leadership by party. A national leadership by value is more advanced than a national leadership by party. According leadership by value, Carson should drop out automatically. According leadership by party, GOP should force Carson to drop out. The reason is very clear, his belief is unconstitutional. What's your idea?

Which Party Should Be Elected?​ By Exegesisme In long run, the prosperity of Canada depends on science, technology, and education. If you vote for the long-term prosperity of Canada, you should ask yourself, which party provide the strongest leadership to promote the progress of science, technology, and education in Canada. However, the progress of science, technology, and education depends on the instructive creativity of the people. How does a political party play a role to promote the instructive creativity of the people? Instructive creativity is a new concept, which means personal creativity which plays instructive role in a group, a community, and/or the whole society. The instructive creativity depends on two factors. First, the freedom and rights are actually endowed in the core of a person through systematic education. Second, the society is well prepared to welcome the emergence of personal creativity. This is a creative culture stimulated by both the progress of politics as examples of USA and UK, and the invention of a deep philosophy as example of Germany. Now in Canada, in the political field, which party can play leadership to promote a sustainable political progress? I hope Canadian people can choose such a party. No matter which party is elected, I hope that party plays a strong leadership in political progress in long run.