WWWTT

Ok then.If the left is like herpes,then the right is like HIV! If I had a choice between the two,I don't think HIV is the way to go. WWWTT

Sorry Wild Bill. My what if reference was to what if the NDP won one third of the seats in Alberta. My mistake has given a different impression than what I was going for. WWWTT

Really? CO2 in our atmosphere can be increasing by two basic methods. The first is that more CO2 is being released into the atmosphere. And the second is that CO2 is not being scrubbed(dissolved into water) or used up by life forms that consume it. When the automatic conclusion is CO2 is increasing because of human activity,then I have a problem with the individuals making this claim! There are many variables that have influence that are not discussed. WWWTT

From the recent research I have done,CO2 has increased by 150 ppm.Or doubled. But where was the CO2 levels recorded and what are the fluctuations?At what levels of our atmosphere?And at what levels does this CO2 actually cause global warming? And what about the rest of the Earth? The 99.2% of the planet that is at a temperature so hot that every solid becomes liquified! Keep in mind that this debate is strictly about the temperature of Earth's atmosphere! It is you whom continuously ignores this fact! WWWTT

Maybe I'm not on Wild Bill's ignore list anymore??? WWWTT

Climate change is a reality! Never denied this,in fact there are millions of examples "climate change" happens. In fact it would be very odd if Earth's climate DID NOT change. WWWTT

It is YOU that denies the facts! WWWTT

You ever thought of doing stand up comedy? The Earths average temperature is well into the thousands of degrees! And why would there be an abundant amount of research easily available connecting a rise of the Earths "surface" temperature with the Earths core temperature? As far as I know,the core temperature has not even been accurately measured?The numbers I have quoted are only estimations. The source of energy that keeps the Earths average temperature well into the thousands of degrees is not even exactly determined. WWWTT

Then you deny the "impact" of the Earths radiation of energy! WWWTT

What's this? WWWTT

What about taking away votes from the conservative youth in the rest of Canada? Better question is how much of a push will this give to the NDP? WWWTT

Here's a thought! Maybe NDP support will slip a few seats in Quebec. But NDP support will significantly strengthen in Ontario,the prairies,Atlantic Canada,BC and here's the cherry on the cake-what if NDP support strengthens in Alberta!!! Say next election what would happen if one third of the seats went to NDP? Where will that leave Justin Trudeau? Where will that leave the liberals? And where will that leave Quebec? WWWTT

Actually Layton ran in the 2004 fed. election as NDP leader. I guess that part doesn't fit in your picture,right? WWWTT

Did not say that. Just providing more facts that were previously not included in the debate. WWWTT

HAAAAA! So how was it again the Earth was warming? Since you have denied the fact that the closest source of energy being radiated to the planet in fact is the Earth itself tells me that you do not want to listen to facts! I believe the Earths climate is changing,always has and always will! Near where I live in the town of Caledon in southern Ontario,there are exposed limestone rock faces.These where formed in a coral bed in some ancient tropical sea.So therefore the climate here millions of years ago was tropical.This is commonly accepted. I deny that there is sufficient data to make the conclusion of global warming due to the use of fossil fuels. Oh and by the way when you say "global warming",you actually mean "the thin surface of the Earth is warming" and not actually the entire Earth! In fact the average temperature of the Earth is around 5 000 to 7 000 degrees celsius. This whole global warming thing is about the heat retention at the surface and atmospheric levels from solar radiation,completely ignoring the fact that the median temp of the planet is well into the thousands of degrees! Oh but now it is "I" that is ignoring facts?!?!?!? Show me something that takes the actual temp. of the Earth into account! And hurry up,I'm a busy man! WWWTT

Ok? WWWTT

Good link cyber! Many people are perplexed by the grapple of addiction and how innocently it can start. WWWTT

When an earthquake rips apart your family,your village,killing tens of thousands,then yes your world has been destroyed! I am sure the victims in Haiti find comfort in your "green house" campaign. WWWTT

It is you that is "way out there on the edge"! Making unfounded claims that we are changing the climate,that we are increasing the temperature of the planet. It is you that completely ignore the fact that in fact the closest source of energy to us is the Earth itself!And NOT the Sun! In fact the average temperature of the Earth is so incredibly high that its contents are liquified!And only a thin cool layer or "crust" lies on the surface where solids can exist.With an average thickness of 50km(The Earths diameter is app.12.5K km,giving a radius of app.6.25K km.Therefore app. 0.8% of the Earths mass is at a low enough temperature so that silica,the major component of the crust can solidify) No where in any research that I have read has taken the closest energy source into account. And then you claim I am a denier???!?! Those who deny facts can not call those who accept facts deniers! When hundreds of thousands of people who died from earthquakes around the world recently (since 2004),was this caused by global warming? Or was it caused by movements within the inner core of our planet? WWWTT

Bringing this debate back to Justin. If Justin is seen as a last chance effort for the liberals to rebound then things must be worse off in their camp then what I previously thought. I'll admit this turn of events is interesting. WWWTT

Actually what you mean to say is that you "claim" that we are making it a more inhospitable place. Shorelines change.People build in low lying areas that are prone to flood damage. Making a claim that natural disaster can be averted by using less CO2 seems kind of far reaching. WWWTT

Why?? WWWTT

Not exactly. WWWTT

Yes that's right. Nor have I seen evidence that any such climate changes would be deemed unusual for the planet. How old is the Earth? 4 billion?4.5 billion years? How long have humans been accurately studying Earths climate? 20,30,40 years? But somehow,in just a few decades,scientists have come to the conclusion that we are destroying the planet. Oh no but it's ok because if we tax,control and regulate CO2,CO2 will no longer be a problem.(that's at least the impression that I get) WWWTT

Are you saying that a woman can become pregnant without a man (sperm cells)? WWWTT