WWWTT

I thought conservatives and republicans steered clear away from George Bush's mess ups? WWWTT

Sorry you're wrong. Nothing personal about saying something about a public figure and what they do in that role. Here's a judges ruling that highlights this. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/montreal-constable-fails-in-bid-to-ban-mocking-sexplosive-porno-flick/article12632949/ WWWTT

Hi Shady. Why are you using the subject of the Taliban negotiations in this thread. I would think that a conservative supporter,in context of the past conservative position about the Taliban would steer miles away from this subject. After all,Jack Layton was way ahead of the conservatives on this. In fact,many deaths,including Canadian soldiers could have prevented if Jack Layton's planned approach was adopted. But that would mean that the conservatives would have to give the NDP some credit and the conservatives are more concerned with their reputation,not the safety of Canadians and people in general. WWWTT

In the clip,with Bob Rae by Justins side,it looks like the blind leading the blind. WWWTT

Actually C377 violates privacy issues and will be shot down in court if it ever becomes law. Trudeau never broke the law for accepting speaking fees from unions. Just like many conservatives never broke the law when getting high paying jobs from the private sector before and after their political careers and had accepted corporations sending over oodles of volunteers(on paid leave) to help on their campaigns come election time. WWWTT

Actually,from what it looks like,waldo highlighted the judges ruling,not the judges personal political opinion. Also,the ruling states that misleading calls were made.Don't need to find people who were mislead to come to that finding. WWWTT

This story is almost a month old apparently. Just recently came across this link. http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/25/305314/confirmed-canada-2011-polls-fraudulent/ First,I am concerned why a story like this is getting very little traction? Then the obvious,what are the consequences of fraud? WWWTT

Was that Chinese woman that gave Jack a massage convicted of soliciting for the intent of prostitution? Do you have the link? WWWTT

Oh no,Justin T is way to smart for that one! WWWTT

I saw the clip of Harper's speech about Russia/Putin and at some point thought to myself that this is probably the furthest Harper has ever stuck his neck out! I can't recall a G8/G20 country/leader ever being publicly scolded like this in recent history at one of their meetings. Here's a link.Please provide others! http://thecanadianpoliticalscene.blogspot.com/2013/06/uk-labour-mp-harpers-speech-was-not.html WWWTT

Ya that's funny GostHacked! Oh and by the way,American Woman is talking down to you as if you are incapable of understanding or less intelligent in some manner. This is abusive and is against the rules. I got so tired of hearing it from her/reporting her that I put her on my ignore list. WWWTT

LOL! WWWTT

So in other words he was publicly embarrassed! You are implying that what he did was OK,as long as the voting public was not aware. WWWTT

Ya actually I'm sure he went to the Ethics comm. because he was not aware he can go so far. Just because what Justin did is allowed,does not mean that people are going to find him to be a sincere and honest person. WWWTT

Still a borderline ethical issue. This issue will plague Justin for the rest of his political career. WWWTT

I agree with you that this is a different situation/case. But that's how politics go. You live by the sword,you die by the sword. WWWTT

Not to mention the libel lawsuits! That's the real kicker here. If everyone was out to get the Ford brothers,then go to court. WWWTT

It's obvious that if Justin was a strong draw,then the speaking engagements would have sold more tickets and made more money. If that was the case then maybe we would still not know about this. I am left wondering how strong of a draw Justin will be at the ballot boxes next election? WWWTT

I partially agree with you on this one cyber. But going back to my opener,the liberals were up in arms when the conservatives used footage of Justin from a charity he was at. The liberals implied that Justin was being a selfless outstanding citizen that truly cared about the less fortunate. And that image has been shot to hell now that its well known that Justin doesn't do "free charity". He will now give some money because he was caught!Just like Duffy! I bet that Justin won't be doing many charities from this point on. WWWTT

So if you smoke crack cocaine at 2am=bad! Smoking crack cocaine at 2pm=OK??? How about answering the side effects of smoking crack Fletch? Or just continue as if smoking crack has no side effects. WWWTT

He's in way over his head! Remember those conservative attack adds? Remember how the liberals were firing back about the footage in the add was taken from Justin donating his time at a charity fundraiser? Well here's one to choke on,Justin isn't a cheap date. Nor does he care much for donating for free! http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/14/justin-trudeau-speaking-fees-charity_n_3443439.html Let the conservative attack adds keep rolling! WWWTT

LOL! It's the media's fault? WWWTT