Don Jonas

So you have nothing. That's what I figured.

Yes, Trump bombed some sacrificial Russian mercenaries with Putin's permission. Big deal. There have been 35 indictments as a direct result of the Russia collusion investigation. You don't know how they directly relate to it because the report isn't out yet, but if they didn't relate, Mueller would have referred it to other law enforcement. So you're misrepresenting the facts or you just don't know them. What specifically has CNN reported that you take issue with? I imagine they told the truth and that somehow offended you?

I can see evidence and form my own conclusions from it. I have enough common sense to do that.

That made no sense at all.

35 indictments and the report isn't out yet. You don't know what's going on until the report is out, but there are already 35 indictments and he hasn't even submitted the report. Seeing Trump practically admit he is a subservient puppet in Helsinki was enough evidence for anyone with half a brain.

You misrepresent more than the media ever does. To say the Russia investigation has no traction is an outright lie.

I was fortunate enough to have a respectable mother who taught me not to lol at people dying or looking sick. I thank God for that.

No, it was not a systemic policy under the Obama administration to use it as a deterrent.

We're talking about how Trump used it as a systemic policy to act as a deterrent, not the occasional time it happened while people were taken into custody under the Obama administration. You should have the courage to own your own offensive policies.

What happens next? He gets confirmed. Even with evidence as obvious as what was provided. Kind of makes you sick, doesn't it?

So the only example of a "lie" you could site was them saying it is Trump's policy to separate children and families, which it absolutely was? I thought you said you gave lots of examples?

Explain how it isn't perjury to deny knowledge of the hacking scheme after he responded to the email about the hacking scheme. You're stumped!

So then why did you bring it up? The fact is, the emails suggest Kavenaugh was in on the hacking scheme, and they definitely show he knew about it before he lied under oath saying he didn't know about it.

Seeing as you say that based on 4 posts that aren't all that inflammatory, I'd say your a classic example of a Trump supporter who can't make an argument or defend their position without name-calling.

What do you base that assessment on? The fact that you're stumped when trying to defend Kavenaugh's perjury or the fact that you're blaming the NYT for the rebellion within Trump's administration?

Look at the evidence presented and try to come up with a plausible scenario where he didn't perjure himself. Go on.

Caught, as in Busted! https://www.thedailybeast.com/newly-released-emails-show-brett-kavanaugh-may-have-perjured-himself-at-least-four-times?source=politics&via=rss

Corey Booker released emails yesterday where Kavenaugh was discussing the illegal use of hacked emails of the Democrats, which he denied knowing about under oath. Don't you read the news?

Trump supporters can't keep their stories straight about whether or not they think the letter is real. Meanwhile Kavanaugh has been caught committing purjury but hey're far too distracted to know. They're still worried about what to do with their Nikes.