drummindiver

What is anecdotal? Not yet. All these dogs do. Should be paint all thee dogs with that broad brush and eradicate them all?. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dog_fighting_breeds

Have you read this thread? The point uis msm have painted them w these super powers. I've been showing this to be false.

Can you explain this comment? Did you see the video showing size of dog equates to bite strength and that scientific brain tests show APBT as stable as Golden Retrievers?

Yes, Helen Keller, several presidents as well as a host of sports and other celebrities are the type. https://www.cesarsway.com/about-dogs/pit-bulls/pit-facts Michael Vick tried as hard as he could to turn these dogs into killers. After he was busted, 49 were seized from his back yard. Of those, 1 was deemed too agressive and had to be euthanized. October 1, 2007 The Federal Case – Dogs Evaluated A team of animal behavior experts selected by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals analyzed the 49 seized dogs and then recommended whether they were suitable either to be adopted by families, trained as police dogs, placed in a sanctuary, or should be euthanized. Only one dog was recommended for euthanasia because of extreme aggression. The others were deemed suitable to go to sanctuaries or foster homes for socialization training. http://aldf.org/resources/laws-cases/animal-fighting-case-study-michael-vick/ You can thank Sports Illustrated and the gangster culture as well as self serving media hysteria. http://crypticphilosopher.com/2012/07/where-pit-bull-prejudice-began/

I'm saying that dogs are dogs. Love em all.

There is a difference between media and non media sites so I'll post this again. Golden Retrievers and APBTS score the same. GRS are bigger and have a stronger bite. Again, you are responding to media hype.Are you always so easily lead?. http://atts.org/breed-statistics/

Very cute. Good on you for rescuing the poor babies.Do you have pics of your CCsand pittie to share?

u You are just not man enough to admit when you are wrong. That's been brought up by other ppl before, so cool beans. I will however ask you one more time. Is Islam the wests' historical enemy?

Certainly a Canadian woman of merit, just unfortunately not enough time in Canada. https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/isabel-paterson

I respect the idea, but the partisan fighting would turn ugly imo.

Oooooh. You didn't specifically use the words at odds every statement So now you've got me. More of the can't argue facts we'll argue what word to detract from you being wrong.

Where do you get this stuff? Prove that and I'll send you five hundred bucks. From something I said, not something obscure found in buried in a link.Or I'll donate it to an animal rescue in your name to show your charitable side.

Beautiful four lane with median right through Sydney Cape Breton over the Canso Causeway with only 2 small villages to pass through. After the Causeway there only one or two more small villages that slow you down all the way to Quebec where it gets bigger by hitting the 401. Don't forget in NB the speed limit is higher One of my best friends works in an Environmental Engineering firm that worked for the company that did the work. We've all kept an eye. Only shady dealings of any magnitude are Ont and Quebec. I'd be very interested to see that story.

You, Shall I repost that all over again?

What he wrote is ironclad historical fact. You are once again changing the rules. He did not say they would forever die as enemies. It was not stated they were exclusive. Your incredible tunnel vision on making sure nothing PC about iislam gets past you leaves you a little blind.

I started bur will finish tomorrow. The writer did seem to come out negatively, but that may be my bias.

Are you just going to play the shill game or at or you going to give us your opinoon as to why Islam is not at odds with the west.

Exactly. You are wrong is fact. You think you are right is opinion. DoG stated a fact. Him stating an opinion was in fact your opinion. See what I mean?

Lol. You hate to be proven wrong, don't you? I've linked to all matter of dogma on this forum as have the majority here. You're starting to emberass yourself.

I agreed that stating an opinion as fact is a mistake. What would you call denying history?

Sorry. This should have been the first quote in my previous post. I though I had hit it.

This is the meat of your denial that the west and Islam were not historical enemies. I left out your ad hom.

Lol. I can't link with a dogma I don't believe in? Try debating the history. You can't. Throw your tantrum.

Im just inforing you what western civilization means cause I don't think you know. So, you ad hoc me and now drag @DogOnPorch into it?

No. You have stated ad nauseum that the west and Islam are not historical enemies, shouting down any non complying statement's and calling names. I have proven you incintrovertably wrong and you don't like it so you resort to ad hom. Same old same old.