drummindiver

Absolutely. They are allies. Stand with them.

I certainly did not state that. I stated I'm glad Putin did not rise to the bait. It would have escalated to who knows what, and that could still happen. You are playing semantics. You have written many diatribes on Trump. I think hate is an accurate adjective.

How do you get that? Just as in ME, they do this, we do that, till it's out of control and a huge effing mess. Just because you hate Trump doesn't make Obama right or Putin wrong. You know Obama is going to keep pushing while he still has the stick.

What's RT

Fair. I did look, had no hits. We were talking expelling diplomats, not sanctions. That's moving the goal posts.

Sorry, where does it say in that link any of that? Did it affect the outcome? Maybe, but again, Hillary was naughty. All the news I have seen states there is no evidence and Obama needs to put up or shut up. I'm not saying they didn't do it btw, there is just no proof.

I quoted that from the link you posted. Again, googled using multiple terms and could not find any instance that Obama had expelled any Russian diplomats.

Thanks to Tipper Gore we have warning labels on albums with "offensive language" yet google refuses to unlink al Alwaki's hate speeches. Is it not better to say f#$k you than kill you? So who gets to choose whose morality is correct?

The question was why should they? Isn't freedom of speech guaranteed in the states and Canada? Why regulate it? You are talking censorsing, not regulating?

There were allegations. No proof. Even they said it was not conclusive, and did not point to the Russians trying to change the outcome. At the end of the day Hillary is still the one who was naughty amiright?

'The report was criticized by security experts, who said it lacked depth and came too late' Hardly conclusive. I could find no evidence of Obama ordering Russian diplomats out before, let alone many times.

Support from whom? Whose truth? Why should the government regulate msm anyways?

Have you seen the evidence proving their culpability? Do you imagine Obama would have done the same had he been retaining office?

You yourself posted countries of concern re immigration. Philippines was one if those. They are number one by a mile of who immigrates here. Ergo......

Russia has not risen to Obama's bait by expelling diplomats. Clearly Obama is trying to make things difficult for the Trump transition. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/30/europe/russia-us-diplomats-expulsion/index.html

Agreed, they are powerful. Third in arms spending. US is still number one with a bullet with bases in both countries. Push comes to shove they won't last long.

They are the moral compass of Islam, and have the money to support loads of terrorism, but do not have military capabilities if they over step too far.

Yes, must be their fault they've been persecuted for thousands of years. Pogroms and such. Oye vei meshugah

President Obama sure is making statements before his departure. I guess it'll give John Le Carre more material. There doesn't seem to be s lot of concrete evidence implicating the Russians. Is Obama right with this expulsion? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/29/obama-expels-35-russian-diplomats-election-hacking-row/

This must be one of those jokes MH was talking about.

Is the OP asking about theology or questioning white self loathing? Do you suggest one causes the other?

Off topic. Not one word about atheism in the OP or link.

And the old fear they were taking over the world. Um no again. http://tacit.livejournal.com/596800.html

nope http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/14/investing/monsanto-bayer-takeover-biggest-deal/

Did you see the link I posted about trillion meals. gmos are safe. Conventional foods killed 351,000 ppl in 2010 the last year i could find stats for. Let's put warning labels on all food then. Notice that many are attributed to organic growing methods and their related illnesses. http://time.com/3768003/351000-people-die-of-food-poisoning-globally-every-year/