marcus

That's the line that the Israeli propaganda machine says and people like you keep repeating. Why don't you look at report after report from various human rights groups and other international expert groups showing how it is Israel who is mostly responsible for the deaths of Gazans?

Why didn't you read what I shared with you so you would understand the meaning of occupation under international law and wouldn't be puzzled like this?

Nope. It is still considered an occupation and Israel continues to violate international law with its actions.

Total LOL. Googling Jews + Compensation Would the $3 billion a year from the U.S. be considered compensation? Would Israel be receiving the assistance if there was no Holocaust?

Do the Americans know that FOX/CNN are washing over their souls? Do they have any idea what the hell their government is actually doing around the world? Former US drone sensor operator Brandon Bryant admits he “couldn’t stand” himself for his participation in the country’s drone program for six years – firing on targets whose identities often went unconfirmed. Since 2001, and increasingly under the Obama administration, the US has been carrying out drone strikes against targets believed to be affiliated with terrorist organizations in countries like Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia. The program, which has been shrouded in secrecy, has been routinely criticized for the high number of resultant civilian casualties. Pakistan’s Peshawar High Court ruled in 2013 that the attacks constitute a war crime and violate the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Meanwhile the Obama administration continues to insist that drone warfare is a precise and effective method of combat. According to data collected by the human rights group Reprieve and published last November, attempts to kill 41 targeted individuals across Pakistan and Yemen resulted in the deaths of some 1,147 people. Often a kill requires multiple strikes, the group noted.

Flashing the anti-semite card doesn't have the same weight it once had. It's the kind of response given by someone who is unable to disprove that Israel is a criminal nation which needs to be held accountable. People are tired of being muzzled within a controlled narrative. The media is coming around to it too, mostly due to the internet and the flow of information. The mainstream media is getting a lot more competition and so they are feeling the pressure to be a little more informative when it comes to things that matter, as opposed to the watered down version. People don't have the stomach and the patience anymore. Especially not when you have one of the most arrogant and crass prime ministers and the like-minded he keeps around him, piloting Israel and its dark side right into the iceberg. When Morning Joe has a moment of clarity on Israel and shares it on air, you know things have changed: CLICK THIS LINK TO SEE VIDEO

So in response to jbg and a few others who have suggested that Palestinians, which many of them have lived in that region for centuries, be moved to Jordan or other Arab states so that European Jews could move into their place, some people suggested that maybe it's European Jews (who have very little connection to the land, if at all) should have been given a space in Germany or in some other European country to live in, instead of Palestine. Of course, Rue was okay with jbg and others suggesting the natives of the land, the Palestinians be removed, but went apesh*t over the comment about Jews and started handing out his unlimited "anti-semite" card.

I am saying that Rue was trying to shame you for talking about something that is outside of the narrative.

They don't look the other way. They just don't look. It's just not in the narrative that is presented to them, which is pretty much the reason they are how they are. They are ignorant to many facts. This is why they are the perfect group for the Zionist lobby to target and get support from. Not long ago, many of these evangelicals were openly racist towards the Jews. That has changed and it started from the likes of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, who have had a huge influence on the direction evangelical Christians have gone.

Another example of trying to shame a person in not discussing something that is outside of the narrative.

Since bush_cheney believes the ICC is not an option, the only option left is terrorist attacks by militant groups and lone wolfs. As according to bush_cheney that seems to be the only thing left that could counter Israel's criminal murderers and their violations of international law. Without the hope of a body representing the international community to stop Israel, you can be sure that the terrorist attacks will go to the next level. Chemical weapons built in basements and released into public places will be the next step of a desperate and hopeless group of people who have been wronged for so long by not only their occupiers, but by the international community.

And since Israel cannot govern itself and continuously commits crimes and murdering people, then what? Kind of like those African countries who commit atrocities. What do you say? You're okay with terrorist attacks? How about getting Palestine into ICC?

A false narrative that Israel and the propaganda machine has been trying to sell and shove down our throats. Fact is that in all three Gaza attacks, Israel was the one who started and provoked the war. Before the Shady's come in here screaming that the kidnappers started it; Hamas had no idea these guys were going to kidnap the teens. Also, in majority of the cases, it has been Israel who has violated the truce and ceasefire that Hamas and the IDF have had.

Not only does Rue engage in the misrepresentation of others, but he also does it for himself. --- All ideas or ideals should be discussed. This goes for Wahabism and Zionism who are both bad ideas for the reason that they advocate the violation of other people's rights in order to further their agenda. Zionism (today) for example, advocates the annexation of Palestinian land (see East Jerusalem and the settlements of West Bank), the stalling and sabotaging the formation of a real and just Palestinian State and a number of other violations of international/human rights in order to achieve its own selfish agenda. This makes Zionism a bad idea. Same goes with Wahabism which enforces its own fundamentalist ideas and ideals onto others, which is also a violation of international/human rights. It's a tough pill to swallow, when a Zionist sees they are being compared to Wahabists, but in many cases, extremist ideas, even when they are enemies, share similar characteristics.

You have a habit of pressing reply like you are going to reply, but you respond with something that has nothing to do with what you're quoting. Speaking of France and foxnews and their mouthpieces:

Except that there is proof.. Now pay attention: In fact, Charlie Hebdo fired a cartoonist who was also charged by France for making so-called "anti-semitic" comments about Sarkozy's son converting to Judaism: Maurice Sinet, 80, who works under the pen name Sine, faces charges of "inciting racial hatred" for a column he wrote last July in the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. The piece sparked a summer slanging match among the Parisian intelligentsia and ended in his dismissal from the magazine. "L'affaire Sine" followed the engagement of Mr Sarkozy, 22, to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, the Jewish heiress of an electronic goods chain. Commenting on an unfounded rumour that the president's son planned to convert to Judaism, Sine quipped: "He'll go a long way in life, that little lad."

The problem here is that you lack the ability to observe correctly, since you are ignorant. Observing based on your World Net Daily articles and your lunch hour with Sean Hannity leaves your knowledge of any situation stunted.

It is also your right to be in denial that your comment which I responded to was B.S.

I guess you missed the part (even though it's right up there for you to see) where one of their own employees had to go to court for making a comment about Sarkozy's son converting to Judaism and then they fired him. So yeah, they do care if they are criticized. But only if it is criticism by the Jews.

It is your right to pretend that you were not proven wrong.

Time to ship the illegal settlers back to Israel (or Europe or United States or wherever they came from) and out of Palestinian land. They and those who fund them, including the government of Israel, are one of Zionism's biggest problems.

Quit being a coward when you are proven wrong by changing the context of the comment. You made this comment: Why ? Such "insults" are routinely hurled at other religions, groups, nationalities, etc. What is so special about Muslims in this context...extra "sensitivity" ? And you were proven wrong by getting an example of the opposite of what you say, not only in France, but also at the same media outlet who is demanding not to be criticized for insulting Muslims.

That's pure B.S. Criticism of Israel creates a frenzy on a regular basis. Racist and hateful comments towards Jews create an even a larger negative reaction. There is definitely a lot more sensitivity when it comes to comments made towards Jews than there is when it comes to Muslims. This is more obvious in U.S. and Canada, but it's also in Europe as well. Charlie Hebdo would have been guilted out of business by the Jewish community/political contributees of the community had it slandered Judaism in a similar way. In fact, Charlie Hebdo fired a cartoonist and was also charged by France for making so-called "anti-semitic" comments about Sarkozy's son converting to Judaism: Maurice Sinet, 80, who works under the pen name Sine, faces charges of "inciting racial hatred" for a column he wrote last July in the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. The piece sparked a summer slanging match among the Parisian intelligentsia and ended in his dismissal from the magazine. "L'affaire Sine" followed the engagement of Mr Sarkozy, 22, to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, the Jewish heiress of an electronic goods chain. Commenting on an unfounded rumour that the president's son planned to convert to Judaism, Sine quipped: "He'll go a long way in life, that little lad."

ISIS and Al Qaeda do not represent 1.6 billion people who call themselves Muslims. You continously make the mistake of using one brush stroke to paint people who follow a religion. Your ignorance and animosity towards this particular religion makes you a bigot.

They're antagonizers, like Westboro Church. Same ***, different pile. Your video of the group you're posting is receiving a similar reaction that Westboro Church receives often - like this: