Leaderboard

1. He had a constituency he defended no different than you do yours and Wynne did hers. He didn't use it. He openly made it clear what he was defending not defending unlike the Liberals who lied about the curriculum and played politics with it trying to cater to the same fundamentalists for votes they alienated. Ford played no politics. He was unlike Wynne from the get go transparent on his position. 2. No its not al alt-right slag. The guy who wrote the curriculum was a pedophile. He hid behind the gay community for righteous cover and there is no way this man should have been hired to dictate which he did the curriculum which perceives it to be acceptable to introduce sex identity issues to 4-6 year olds. Perceiving children as prepared to listen to and have to accept sexual identity issues is a projection by this man who had a lot of leftist sympathizers who have not taken ownership of who he was and what he stands for and what they stand for which is to project their political views as to sexual identity onto children in the name of leftist righteousness. 3.Why would I trust anyone let alone an educator with the best things for my children? I trust myself. No I do not blindly hand over or delegate that trust to authority. That's a liberal concept I disagree with. I believe such trust has to be earned and parenting begins and ends at home and if you want me trust you as an educator then show me apolitical neutrality for public institutions not deliberate bias agendas that cater to specific political views. Its intellectually lazy to be liberal and delegate to governments that which you need to define for yourself. Schools should not have to tell you what to think, only how to think. Who you choose to sleep with is no business of any school. How a body functions and how to keep it safe and clean is. 4.Experts my ass. You just want to delegate common sense. How much expertise do you need to be told how to explain bodily functions. Get real. 5. You first I do not understand. I am not first, second, third. I am an individual. I have children whose formative years I am responsible for. I can not and should not dump on teachers any job of explaining to my children what their body is and does or why some people have different choices than others and how we do NOT impose our views on others nor do we allow others to impose their views on us as we treat people as we want to be treated. I also could not be more crystal clear-if you have an agenda to teach that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice that is acceptable, do it at home. Do not expect the school to play that role. Its role is to be neutral. The only role it has is to make sure adults do not touch or molest their students. Health and wellness is not rocket science. The so called experts are idiots who I had the pleasure of attending school with at OISE. Experts my ass. They get ph.d's in self serving political biases and opinions. Expert. Right. I do not need a ph.d to teach me we treat people the way we wish to be treated and if there is no consent, something is wrong. This need to shove political opinions in peoples' faces is a liberal concept where you want to impose a state agenda on everyone. I do not need the state stuffed in my face like a large tit. I do not need to be breast fed thank you. I didn't like Fellini movies either for the same reasons. The man's liberal obsession overly focused him on breasts. I mean God bless Sophia Loren but not everything is about breast feeding the public.

Of course, I have nothing against the religious beliefs of people who adhere to their religion, however, for me personally, marrying of an adult man to a girl is immoral and I can not react indifferently to this topic. Early marriage and early onset of sexual activity have long-term consequences for women's health. Also, in poor countries, a young mother, being forced to quit her education and begin to do household work, is deprived of the opportunity to get a profession and is economically or completely dependent on her husband.

That sounds like a slap across the face, Or in Canadian terms a boarding call, 5 min major....all well deserved for Justins under handed tricks to secure a seat on what really the UN....we are selling out integrity for a seat....It does not surprise me any more what the liberal government is will to do ... Who does that, backs a resolution put forth by North Korea, Zimbabwe, and the state of Palestine.....because those guys are the moral compass we all look up to, they set the standard for how nations are to conduct themselves...Man you guys that voted liberal must be just shaking your heads right now...How did we become so desperate for a seat on the UN council, one has to wonder what is going to happen when we get it, if we support this shit now , what else could we expect from your man Justin.... https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/canada-made-deal-with-the-devil-by-supporting-anti-israel-resolution-former-us-ambassador-to-un/ar-BBXSzG8

In regards to your second question, precisely which is why I made my point. His arguments were about what you write and when you write about gender identity choices which I am sorry doesn't require an expert. You do not need to be an expert to know how to teach tolerance and respect for people with different values. Its basic politeness and why people need a government or expert to tell them not to pick their nose at the dinner table is beyond me. Likewise with ear wax. In regards to politics you can't get more political than the world of academia, particularly in social sciences. Its all about preconceived political opinions that then shape the focus of the theories. Its why I prefer health sciences based on objective physical explanations. I say it again to all the nurses out there. A Registered Nurse does a far better job explaining health matters than a psychologist or some shmuck like me who spent most of job with sex perverts. I like Nurses as health teachers. Nurse Sue was the best sex educator in the world precisely because she was totally neutral in her explanations. I love her model of teaching. The next was Xaviera Hollander. She actually as you know was an escort but her explanations and analysis were used all over the world in sexology faculties precisely because of her objectivity and lack of politics in what she said. Neither of these two is an academic but considered by many the two best explainers of sexual behaviour and physical anatomy. My issue is what age you switch from health science education to human relations and lifestyle choices and that to me should be in grade 8 and 9 not elementary school or kindergarten as Wynne wanted it to be. Enough with sexualizing children. They can learn about their bodies without having to worry about sexual behaviour choices. Our world of business which requires we sell products based on manipulating sexual feelings and insecurities is what has caused all this confusion and pressure on children. No expert is willing to discuss that because its common sense and because universities depend on those same businesses for funding. Experts bah. Give me Nurse Sue. I did teach sexology once. Never again. The curriculum was ridiculous. I hold in high esteem nurses at Sick Kid's hospital and in medical clinics across Toronto and pediatricians and certain volunteers in women's shelters or certain people that work in children's aid as social workers and for that matter certain police. Their clinical or street training is what makes them experts. What makes them experts is they are non judgmental and they deal with the here and now. I admit I have a different view on this. In one sense it is a very strong advocate of sex education but at the right time and with the right content. I never had an issue with Ford. He is not a prude. He certainly did not suck up to fundamentalist religious groups on this issue. Not his style. He was making an argument about what the content should be. You and I do not disagree we need sex education just on what forms it should take and maybe at what age and even then you and I do not disagree. I just have a prejudice against myself and those in my field. Psychology of Law made me understand at best all we learn is an approximate attempt and it must always be challenged and we need to listen to the victims and the children and the people we lecture to and be prepared when people panic and resist discussing issues that make them uncomfortable to be like Nurse Sue-matter of fact, blunt but not alarming. Man she was good at talking down ignorance. She never raised her voice or judged anyone. Some of the comments I got in class made me want to cringe. People can and do bring very entrenched cultural and religious views with them and hide behind multi-culturalism to demand their views be imposed on others. For example. I had a group of students complain I was inappropriate because I explained about sexual assault and common assault and explained the difference. They complained I talked about sex in the class. I was teaching the difference between criminal sexual assault and civil common assault and battery. The university told me not to upset them. I asked the school to come observe what I was teaching and they refused and did not provide me an example of how to teach sexual assault without upsetting people who don't want to hear about it. Universities today cater to whoever pays them cash and have taught students they get whatever they want when they pay cash. Since that means international students who pay cash we are told not to upset them, i.e., fail them, expect them to read or write or think critically. I am not being hired back at one university because I refused to not teach about this. That is what happens. We faculty are all temporary now and told we are expendable if we upset students for any reason and I mean any reason. Education is so competitive now students call the shots at colleges and universities and what we have and I have taught at over 12, are not experts, but frightened faculty who avoid any meaningful, critical discussions for fear of upsetting students from cultures with different views than ours about crime, sexual behaviour, morality, religion. Sorry but thinking the world of academia is going to help you is naive. Its compromised and as tainted politically as it gets.

The Mayor of Winnipeg meets with Canada's new overlords from Beijing.

The public are not interested in any of that, seeing the benefits are you F***ing kidding me, every national disaster this country has ever had be forest fires, floods, washed out bridges, SAR rescue, on top of sovereignty patrols in the artic or our fishing grounds you name it the military has been there and is still there....we have always had Canadians backs...24/7, the military has been providing support to all Canadians behind the scenes every day .. don't get we wrong there are Canadians out their that do support us 100% of the time...to them Bravo Zulu, your the reason most soldiers go to work everyday, to the vast majority of Canadians that don't like the military or don't care , to bad we serve this country, not your lazy asses... And what has the public done for us in return, have they, stood up for veterans in their hour of need , "nope" instead they are forced to take our government to court to get the same treatment as every other Canadian already has...., have they ensured our small military is properly equipped, and funded so we can train, so we can come home to our love ones intact... "nope", have they ensured we don't get sent into a war zone with out the proper equipment / clothing/ wpns…."nope", have they stood up to the government when conflicts have become unpopular " nope" What do they really do for our military...or is it a one way street, the military does all the given and the public sits there and laughs at us... The public knows nothing about our military, nor are they interested in what we do, how we do it, sure "some" will gather around Nov 11 and pay respects to the fallen, the majority will go to work or go home as they got better things to do...shit can't even get most of them to wear poppies....Your Military has been begging for help for the last 40 years and the public have turned a blind eye to them....and yet they still serve the ungrateful public and now you want us to do what dance in the streets, get on our knees.... What is it that our military has done to the public that we are treated this way ? Many soldiers have given up trying to serve the public, instead they serve the man to the left and to the right on him...because they are the ones they call brothers and sisters, they will always have your back, they will always come running when the SHTF....many have become bitter, resentful, unpatriotic all towards the public...regardless of how much you give the public it is never enough...

This is written as if by a man who cares nothing about Canada, its past or its future. The globalist who would be just as happy in New York or Bangkok or New Dehli, who has no connection with or any sense of shared identity with Canadians.

My disdain over so called experts is not a partisan concern it is one of concern for a bunch of self professed ivory tower academia of which I was one and am. It comes from me knowing I have bull shit degrees, and spent many days teaching in bullshit institutions. My real expertise did not come from academia it came from clinical exposure, i.e., listening and witnessing trauma not engaging in the academia-street reality and clinics straightened me out but good mot statistics and bullshit theories based on them. The disdain is for me and my kind who are full of shit and made things worse. I am being very honest with you. I am not afraid to say a lot of what I studied and was told to teach is bullshit Thanks but I have no problem with health sciences nd what nurses teach thank you. Having obtained bullshit psychology post graduate training at the same place as the pedophile who wrote the curriculum I admit am an ivory tower shit head. Its being honest Michael. Common sense is what raises children not so called experts on what goes in a curriculum. Its an opinion of course but hardly a partisan one other than I did say and its true Liberals have great faith in authority and the state to dictate how we should live and I do not. Been there done that with Hitler, Stalin and lots of other state agencies. Me no like nor trust Big Brother For me a state is a last resort of protection not a first resort to tell you or me how to think. I don't like schools being used as propagation centres. Big brother gone amuck. I respect your opinion. I appreciate it but I Get back to me when you can define what an "expert" is.

Mind you, how many Canadians even know that is a Canadian Battle Flag ? It's not like they are taught their own history by the totalitarian leftist public school system

It's making people into clowns as well, Ron MacLean babbling his Woke dogma is like a cross between Howdy Doody and Zoolander.

There are no Alpha male Canadians anymore, this land is totally effeminate, the loonie left has all the apes balls in a jar.

Ford has never been against sex education. He criticized the type of curriculum being used. It did not discuss anatomy and dental hygiene, it was a script on teaching children about gender identity and gender identity lifestyles when they are 4,5,6. Rainbow flags in elementary school do not belong anymore than heterosexual flags do or any other flags do other than the municipal, provincial or federal flags. The curriculum used in elementary schools was written by a pedophile. It is completely distorted by that pedophiles projections as to sexuality and how children should perceive sexuality when they are pre-pubic. He used homosexual lifestyle as a cover. Gay parents as much as straight parents who I both support I spoke with and agree, sex education is about hygiene, health issues and learning what is private. Teaching about gender identity choices belongs later on in human relations classes. The two are not and should not be assumed to be the same. Gay parents have just as much rights as straight parents to assure their children can remain innocent and unencumbered by issues they should not have to deal with until they are better equipped. We will not allow children to be neutral and innocent. Children already accept us as we are. They don't need our crap projected on them. When they reach puberty, then and only then we have to be honest, open and non judgmental about why people make choices and what it means to make a choice based on free will and consent. Ford was not and is not the issue. Neither are fundamentalists who have been told its ok for them to expect their rights be imposed on us in public systems. The issue is with us-parents of children. We need to speak up and get involved and teach our children and not off ramp everything onto the school system which has become anything and everything society no longer wants to deal with-so its dumped in the schools. Schools are one size fits all hospitals, social service agencies, criminal enforcement agencies, day cares, chauffeurs. They are anything but teaching institutions these days.

In India and no doubt some parts of the Far East, girls are getting married off at the age of 14. I am with you though in that a young innocent girl who doesn't even know who she is at that age being married off to a grown man.