geoffrey Posted May 18, 2007 Report Posted May 18, 2007 The government will screw all of us, no matter what. Agreed. That's why I'd like to see private health care. Unfortunately that's not a possibility in the Tommy Douglas mindset (1960's thinking!) of the very ignorant voting population. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Mad_Michael Posted June 3, 2007 Report Posted June 3, 2007 Public healthcare ought not to be denied to people on the basis of moral judgements about their behaviour. If one were to do so, perhaps single out fat people or smokers (to use the best examples), then one ought also to disqualify those who drive cars (general pollution and dangerous accidents) and of course children who have a high tendency to injure themselves with reckless behaviour. Drinkers of alcohol or those who smoke pot, rock-climbers, parachutists and skiers should also be banned from public healthcare as all of these people, by their own choices, cause themselves to need healthcare. The list is endless. Indeed, if one applies the rule consistently, no one in Canada ought to be covered by public healthcare. So that's the choice with having a public healthcare program - no one, or everyone is covered. You can't just pick and choose which ones meet your moral standards and preclude those that don't. Quote
NovaScotian Posted June 15, 2007 Report Posted June 15, 2007 I am not sure about food, but with smoking I imagine the taxes more then make up for any healthcare costs associated with treating them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.