Saturn Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto...tory/Front/home Poor Conservatives are so eager to jump on the gravy train, they can't wait a few months for the election to pass before they make a mockery of their so-called Accountability Act. OTTAWA — The Harper government has opened the door to a watering down of its vaunted strategy to crack down on lobbying, as it contemplates forcing lobbyists to only report their formal verbal communications with federal officials, documents show.Under proposals that are circulating in the government-relations industry in Ottawa, lobbyists would not have to report “spontaneous” verbal communications with government officials, nor would they have to disclose e-mail or other written exchanges. The proposals stand in contrast to the Conservative Party's pledge in the 2006 election to “require ministers and senior government officials to record their contacts with lobbyists.” At the time, the Conservative Party vowed to stop the back-and-forth between the worlds of politics and lobbying, which it said was corrupting government. In particular, a number of lobbyists were working for the government as well as for the Liberal leadership campaign or with Liberal ministers. ---- “It's just a huge loophole. People will say, ‘Let's go golfing and have a spontaneous communication,' ” said Duff Conacher, co-ordinator at Democracy Watch. “The Conservatives have clearly broken their promise to end secret lobbying,” he said. ---- A spokesman for the Treasury Board confirmed that the Accountability Act will not force federal officials to record their own contacts with lobbyists. “The onus is on the lobbyist to report,” said Robert Makichuk, chief of media relations at Treasury Board. Quote
na85 Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 It's ok though, because the Liberals under Martin and Chretien were corrupt and had the Sponsorship Scandal. Quote
Topaz Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 It's ok though, because the Liberals under Martin and Chretien were corrupt and had the Sponsorship Scandal. Have you ever heard two WRONGS don't make it RIGHT??? Just think the power Harper would have with a majority government!! We would have a US-Bush-type govt and alot of people would regret voting for this ???????!!! Just hope all you Alliance/Cons support that he doesn't send you kid over to war if he gets a majority. The military is needs soldiers now, so you better think twice when the election comes. Quote
na85 Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 lol, I think you missed the sarcasm in my post. Quote
madmax Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Lots of people had high expectations. Even people whom did not vote for them thought they would be different in this regards. But just more of the same. May as well be Mulroney and Chretian again. Quote
Saturn Posted March 6, 2007 Author Report Posted March 6, 2007 Lots of people had high expectations. Even people whom did not vote for them thought they would be different in this regards. But just more of the same.May as well be Mulroney and Chretian again. I expected they would stay clean until the next election. Harpocrite began bashing my hopes the day he announced his cabinet. Yep, my expectations were unreasonably high. Quote
geoffrey Posted March 6, 2007 Report Posted March 6, 2007 Having lobbyists keep track of every nod in the hallway was unreasonable, and a large area of criticism from the opposition parties. The CPC made such a concession as it is reasonable. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Catchme Posted March 27, 2007 Report Posted March 27, 2007 So, here we have Harper NOT, utilizing all Gomery's accoutnability positions that would make elected officials accountable for such things as sponsorship payoffs, and NOW we have Harper bringing back sponsorship. The only thing is Harper et al are less accountable than the Liberals ever were. So I guess we can look forward to way more of tax dollars being used to payoff party supporters. Quote When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die. ~Jean-Paul Sartre
Who's Doing What? Posted March 28, 2007 Report Posted March 28, 2007 Just more of the same. It is unfortunate that the Right has no other alternative. They will be voting in a liberal Govt. whether they like it or not. Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Michael Bluth Posted March 29, 2007 Report Posted March 29, 2007 Having lobbyists keep track of every nod in the hallway was unreasonable, and a large area of criticism from the opposition parties. The CPC made such a concession as it is reasonable. Still stronger than the Liberal lobbyist rules... Quote No one has ever defeated the Liberals with a divided conservative family. - Hon. Jim Prentice
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.