CIA. centalized insurgency agency?

[obsidian]

If any of you do the research (won’t be including citation yet) you will find that the CIA has been involved in numerous Black Operations. The CIA's role isn't just intelligence gathering, they are also used for black operations in which the US can't be held accountable, assassinations, coups, economic warfare, misinformation, provoking genocides, and for initially funding many terrorist organizations. However this is largely because of the American Publics unwillingness to sacrifice human lives for Pax Americana, or the neo-con doctrine of the Project for the New American Century. Americans cannot justify sacrificing lives for material commodities; whether it's gold, oil, COCAINE, or HEROIN. For the gov't to perform these "missions" they need to hide them from the American public, for fear of the non existent support they will get. Since 1947, and the creation of the National Security Act, the CIA spawned from this act have been waging these secret wars on the third world, forcing them to spread their legs and accept the inevitable raping by Corporate America.

Documented Covert Wars

Iran

Guatemala

Zaire

Dominican Republic

Indonesia

Greece

Chile

Laos

Cambodia

Grenada

El Salvador

Nicaragua

Afghanistan

Iraq

Vietnam

It is essential for any country, especially a super power, to have a intelligence agency. But the CIA is far from only being a intelligence gathering community. They've sold weapons to Iran-Iraq, provoked wars, and killed millions of innocent civilians. The role of an intelligence agency is to prevent attacks and if not prevent, allow for the preparation of and most importantly national defense. However if you compare that to the current role of the CIA it drastically differs.

The majority of the conflicts arise from leaders of certain countries trying to break free of US tyranny for the benefit of the country as a whole. A prime example of this can be found in an increasingly familiar country, that of Iraq. The British established Iraq as a mandate using military force. The British claimed this was because of fear of Nazi takeover or the possibility of the countries of {Baghdad, Mosul, and Basra} (modern day Iraq) to cut off oil to the west. The British then, with haste, gave power to the exiled King Faisal, any opposition would be crushed by the British army. The Hashemite rule lasted until 1958 when it was overthrown by a coup d'etat. The new gov’t threw out the Baghdad Pact and established friendly relations with the USSR. The US viewed this as very threatening, 5 years later there was an overthrow of the government organized by Colonel Abdul Salam Arif. Colonel Abdul Salam Arif was at first supportive of the Ba'ath Party (socialist) and then withdrew from the Ba'ath Party after he organized the coup and became president. Colonel Abdul Salam Arif was pro-US and abolished the past reforms of the prior governments. Suddam Hussein was next in line, when the gov’t was overthrown he became president of the Revolutionary Command Council. The CIA was usually the sole sponsor of the coups. Suddam reigned during the Iraq-Iran war and committed various human rights violations. In 1991 Kuwait was slant drilling into Iraqi territory, which is simply put, stealing. The CIA assured Kuwait and Iraq that they US would remain neutral, and the US began economic reforms within Iraq and sold arms to them. Yet when the Iraqis attacked, Bush Sr. said Iraq was poised to take over the whole Middle-East region and the threat must be neutralized. The truth is US, or any other country, would have reacted almost identically to the way Saddam had. Suddam was socialist and nationalized the Iraqi oil fields. This was a huge thorn in the sides of the US, France, and the UK who had previously controlled 95% of the regions oil. Bush Sr. jumped on this opportunity of public support to send troops into the region. During the war the US suffered only 150 fatalities while in Iraq more than 100,000 perished. This was a slanted war from the very beginning. The US used phosphorus weapons (incendiary rounds, banned by Geneva Convention) and mainly targeted the infrastructure of Iraq. The us bombed bridges, hospitals, food deposits, grain storage, water treatment plants, roads, etc. The US then exited Iraq and used their affluence on the UN to encourage economic sanctions. Since nearly all the infrastructure was destroyed Suddam Hussein could barely take care of his people. The US, in turn the UN, banned economic aid, financial aid, importation of food, and many more unjust and unnecessary sanctions. Among the "unjust and unnecessary sanction" the ban of water treatment materials are at the top of my list. After the Gulf War, and until recently, the leading cause of death in Iraq was diarrhea...solely caused by the imposed sanctions of the US. It is estimated that US economic sanctions are responsible for, conservatively, 500,000 deaths of innocent civilians. The US hoped that this would cause reforms in Iraq; they believed many would believe their propaganda, and that Saddam would be blamed for the situation and overthrown. However Suddam persevered, he established the oil for food program among many others attempts to benefit the country despite the sanctions. Suddam was to damn resilient, the people recognized how he had freed them from British, French, and American tyranny by nationalizing Iraqi oil. 10 years later Suddam was still in power, with no coup in sight, despite the sanctions, in despite of the western word. Iraq had not conformed and the US had had enough. The situation escalated 6 months prior to the invasion of Iraq when Saddam proposed and started selling oil in euros. This threatened the petrodollar which, if other countries followed suit, would end the hegemony of the petrodollar and instate the petroeuro as the dominant currency for oil transactions. THE US/CIA HAD ENOUGH OF IT. Now it wasn't only the corporate profits which they were longing for at stake, it was also the hegemony of the US dollar. The CIA fabricated evidence, fed it through Psyops which spread the message to the military, and fed it through Public Relations to the news agencies. Success. The Americans had been conned into a conflict over non-existent weapons of mass destruction, reinstating cold war fears, justifying defence spending. The Americans got what they wanted: 1) Control of the nationalized oil 2) Destruction of Government, destabilization 3) Intimidation to any other countries that may step out of line. The US made the Shi'a, Kurd’s, and Sunni’s fight in a civil war for power over the country. While at war the Iraqi's couldn’t worry about oil. Does it surprise you that the US and UK now own Iraqi oil? Does it surprise you that there's a bloodbath over oil? I'll tell you it doesn't surprise me anymore, its what I have come to expect of them.

This is just one example of the numerous operations the US has been involved in without the consent of we the people, with no declaration of war. As I said before, intelligence gathering is crucial for national security, but is assure you that's not what it is used for. These countries posed no threat to the United States, they were all 3rd world. When we attacked Iraq in 2003 they were under 12 years of sanctions and could barely get clean water or medicine, let alone defend themselves. These actions result in the needless death of civilians so we can continue raping the world for its resources. Devaluing the people and the countries of the world for the benefit of whom? I don't think any of you own sweatshops, plantations, or oil companies; however most of our politicians are involved in one way or another. It is Corporate America who is seeking to gain from these atrocities. And frankly, they don't care about us either; they send us to war to die the same as they send us to war to kill. Give them the time and the place, and we're next on the cutting block.

WAKE

UP

!

[White Doors]

You also did not write that. You should provide a link or that is plagarism.

[obsidian]

i did write that.

that time i actually took the time to use all my sources, notes, and terminology.

dont think you are superior to me because you, at first, raped my thread "nazi-us connection"

and if you think i didnt write that, you can keep on expecting more shit like that, cuz if thats what it takes i will. the reason why i wrote the nazi-us connection thread so fast is because of the results of this thread. i spent time, compiled information, and wrote a pretty damn good essay in my oppinion. but no one read it. no one replied.

if peoples attention spans are too short to read the full story

and to skeptical to allow any concise information to be made available in shorter forms

what can you do?....